Re: Memory leak on 5.1-RELEASE?

2004-01-31 Thread Jorn Argelo
qld_safe > --datadir=/usr/loc 566 con- S138:26.09 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld > --basedir=/usr/local --data > > According to top and ps, mysql is only using around 59M VSZ. > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Jorn Argelo wrote: > > Are you sure that there isn't anything else runni

Re: Memory leak on 5.1-RELEASE?

2004-01-31 Thread dpk
n't > rely on top too much acually. Vmstat is a better program when looking > at memory. > > Cheers, > > Jorn > - Original Message ----- > From: "dpk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:10 AM >

Re: Memory leak on 5.1-RELEASE?

2004-01-31 Thread Jorn Argelo
program when looking at memory. Cheers, Jorn - Original Message - From: "dpk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:10 AM Subject: Memory leak on 5.1-RELEASE? > (I'm not a member of the list; please Cc me on any replie

Memory leak on 5.1-RELEASE?

2004-01-30 Thread dpk
(I'm not a member of the list; please Cc me on any replies.) We're running Apache 1.3.28 on a 5.1-RELEASE machine. It's a Dell PE 2650 w/ 2GB RAM. The site contains a lot of large files (multi-megabyte) - otherwise there's nothing unusual running. The Active memory use, according to top, seems ra