prefer to have
more partitions in traditional freebsd (with MBR table i think). using
GPT
is the last solution for me.
i should create more than 8 partitions with gpart command (flag n which
identifies entries) but i have errors when using it. is there any special
option which should
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
thanks Carl,
i tried your your manual step by steps on FreeBSD8.2 but error happened.
this is what i've done:
gpart create -s MBR ad3
ad3 created
gpart add -t freebsd ad3
ad3s1 added
gpart create -s BSD -n 20 ad3s1
gpart: geom 'ad3s1': File Exists
if
On 2013-06-01 08:40, s m wrote:
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more.
i checked FreeBSD handbook, but it doesn't say anything about defining
more partitions
thanks guys,
i understand another solution is GPT partitioning. but i prefer to have
more partitions in traditional freebsd (with MBR table i think). using GPT
is the last solution for me.
i should create more than 8 partitions with gpart command (flag n which
identifies entries) but i have
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:35:58 +0430
s m wrote:
thanks guys,
i understand another solution is GPT partitioning. but i prefer to
have more partitions in traditional freebsd (with MBR table i think).
using GPT is the last solution for me.
i should create more than 8 partitions with gpart
partitions in traditional freebsd (with MBR table i think).
using GPT is the last solution for me.
i should create more than 8 partitions with gpart command (flag n
which identifies entries) but i have errors when using it. is there
any special option which should be included in kernel
s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com writes:
thanks guys,
i understand another solution is GPT partitioning. but i prefer to have
more partitions in traditional freebsd (with MBR table i think). using GPT
is the last solution for me.
i should create more than 8 partitions with gpart command (flag n
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more.
i checked FreeBSD handbook, but it doesn't say anything about defining
more partitions.
my question is: how can i define
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:10:32 +0430, s m wrote:
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more.
That's correct and expected for the MBR partitioning approach
(which
thanks for your reply,
it is a good news if i can define more partitions with gpart. names
are not so important for me. if i can define more partitions with
gpart, are these partitions work correctly? you know i wan to define a
journal partition for each partition on my freebsd. so if i use
s m writes:
and my last question, some people say to change byte 0x28a of the
disk from 0x08 to 0x14 (which 14 is the number of partitions). do
you think it's a good idea and applicable solution?
Short answer: if you have to ask - no, it isn't.
:-)
Respectfully
writes:
and my last question, some people say to change byte 0x28a of the
disk from 0x08 to 0x14 (which 14 is the number of partitions). do
you think it's a good idea and applicable solution?
Short answer: if you have to ask - no, it isn't.
:-)
Respectfully
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:10:32 +0430, s m wrote:
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more.
That's correct and expected for the MBR partitioning
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:10:32 +0430, s m wrote:
my question is: how can i define more partitions on my freebsd? (for
example, ad3s1a, ..., ad3s1h, ad3s1i, ad3s1j, ...).
You cannot. You need to use the GPT partitioning approach
and repartition your disk
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:10:03 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:10:32 +0430, s m wrote:
my question is: how can i define more partitions on my freebsd? (for
example, ad3s1a, ..., ad3s1h, ad3s1i, ad3s1j, ...).
You cannot. You
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 05:36:13 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:10:32 +0430, s m wrote:
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more
s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com writes:
hello all
i want to install freebsd8.2 on my system. for some reasons, i need
partitions more than 6. my freebsd just allow me to define partitions
from a to h, not any more.
i checked FreeBSD handbook, but it doesn't say anything about defining
more
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:07:59 -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
There is a package called 'linuxfdisk' that is just a FreeBSD
implementation of the linux fdisk and will show you what the FreeBSD
partitions/slices are. You can also use gpart in the base system to get
the same information
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:07:59 -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
There is a package called 'linuxfdisk' that is just a FreeBSD
implementation of the linux fdisk and will show you what the FreeBSD
partitions/slices are. You can also use gpart in the base
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:24:06 +0100, Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org wrote:
/dev/ada0s8 /u01ext2fs ro,noauto 00
I've got 2 ext3 partitions mounted.
/dev/ada0s8 /mnt/dump ext2fs rw 0 0
/dev/ada0s9 /mnt/archlinux
partitions/slices are. You can also use gpart in the base system to
get the same information. The command 'gpart list ada0' will show the
primary partitions, and the command 'gpart list ada0s4' should show
the logical partitions inside of the extended partition. You can also
use 'file -s
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com writes:
So it's my stupid mistake. I could have sworn it was ext2, but it was
ext4. Sorry for all the noise! However, I'm glad you have helped, and
that I have learned a little bit about Linux partitions as FreeeBSD
slices.
It was empty, so I just
partitions as FreeeBSD
slices.
It was empty, so I just reformatted it as ext2, and hey presto; all is
right with the world.
Good to know you have it working, but for future reference there is a
fuse implementation of an ext4 driver:
sysutils/fusefs-ext4fuse EXT4 implementation for FUSE
9.1 on x86_64.
No doubt this question has been asked before, but how do I mount logical
partitions (e2fs) under FreeBSD? I have checked the handbook, and
DuckDuckGo'ed, but without finding anything useful.
The third slice on my first disk is a physical one, and will mount
happily under
On 1/25/2013 5:36 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
9.1 on x86_64.
No doubt this question has been asked before, but how do I mount logical
partitions (e2fs) under FreeBSD? I have checked the handbook, and
DuckDuckGo'ed, but without finding anything useful.
The third slice on my first disk is a physical
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com writes:
9.1 on x86_64.
No doubt this question has been asked before, but how do I mount logical
partitions (e2fs) under FreeBSD? I have checked the handbook, and
DuckDuckGo'ed, but without finding anything useful.
The third slice on my first disk
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options.
* The modern GPT scheme reserves 34
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.dewrote:
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
That's rather up to you. AFAIK it attempts to create partitions that
preserve cylinder
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries
both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage?
I think the latest version does.
I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed
it several times
Warren Block:
* Funnily enough, the ancient BSD dangerously dedicated scheme
is the only one that out of the box does not misalign partitions.
The filesystems don't begin at the start of the slice anyway. There is
a bsdlabel there.
Yes and no.
If you look at the bsdlabel(8) output
Short version: Is it possible to group existing partitions into slices
without affecting data?
Long version:
I had a disk sliced/partitioned like this:
ad4s1
ad4s1a
ad4s1b (swap)
ad4s1d
ad4s1e
ad4s1f
ad4s2 (storage)
ad4s3
ad4s3a
ad4s3b (swap)
ad4s3d
ad4s3e
Thomas, thank you for reply! No, it wasn't dangerously dedicated disk.
However, what is the exact command to add ad4s1 and ad4s3 using
bsdlabel? Is it possible at all? I thought I should use fdisk or
gpart for that.
Thanks,
Sergi M
___
such as ad4s1, ad4s2, ad4s3
and disklabel to subdivide a slice into FreeBSD partitions such as ad4s1a,
ad4s1b, ad4s1c, etc. gpart is used to create GPT partitions such as ad4p1,
ad4p2, ad4p3, etc. Subdividing a slice into FreeBSD partitions is used with
MBR partition/slice table but not recommended
Thomas, thank you very much for your mail, but that isn't what I asked.
Of course, I know that bsdlabel -R ad0s1 new_label_file writes new
labels to ad0s1.
My question is: what to do if I _lost_ s1, s2, and s3 - how to recover
_them_ first? Without that, all I can do is to write labels table
table
directly on ad0.
SergiM.
I thought you had found where the slices and partitions had been. Otherwise,
if you only have the BSD partitions and need to label more than 8, there is
gpart in FreeBSD base system and Rod Smith's gdisk, available in FreeBSD ports
and also on the System Rescue CD
'gpart show -l ad4' shows GPT labels on all the ad4 partitions. Is
there a reverse lookup, say to find out the GPT label for ad4p4?
Yes, it can be parsed out of 'gpart show -l' output, but anything more
direct?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 7/28/2011 7:55 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I want to create a GPT disk structure that has the following partitions:
MBR
NTFS (1.2G)
NTFS (200G)
FreeBSD OS (250G)
NTFS (15G)
FAT-32 (100G) (needs to be RW for W7 and FreeBSD and ntfs-3g is just
not stable enough)
FreeBSD data only (380G)
The NTFS
I want to create a GPT disk structure that has the following partitions:
MBR
NTFS (1.2G)
NTFS (200G)
FreeBSD OS (250G)
NTFS (15G)
FAT-32 (100G) (needs to be RW for W7 and FreeBSD and ntfs-3g is just
not stable enough)
FreeBSD data only (380G)
The NTFS partitions are to place the Windows7 system
the installation and operation of FreeBSD, within a logical
patition of an extended partition ...?
FreeBSD can mount and use filesystems created on partitions inside
'extended partition' type slices (cue standard exposition of the
difference between partitions and slices in FreeBSD-speak.) True
hello.
Some time ago, I asked on this list, about installing FreeBSD, and it
was then confirmed that FreeBSD requires to be installed in a primary
partition.
That is consistent with the current FreeBSD Handbook, which states
FreeBSD must be installed into a primary partition.
However, in
of FreeBSD, within a logical patition of an
extended partition, that has given a result that confirms that FeeBSD
can now be successfully installed and run, in a logical partition of an
extended partition of a hard drive?
FreeBSD can mount and use filesystems created on partitions inside
'extended
on partitions inside
'extended partition' type slices (cue standard exposition of the
difference between partitions and slices in FreeBSD-speak.) True.
However, I believe that you may well have difficulty *booting*
FreeBSD unless the kernel (ie. /boot) can be read from a primary
partition.
I presume
On 14 March 2011 20:00, freebsd_u...@guice.ath.cx wrote:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Guidance with the following:
We are limited to Support for ATA-100/66/33 IDE and ATAPI compliant
devices. With that said, we have our atapi/33 optical on a add in
controller (PCI) and are seeking to
Annotated below ...
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 07:00:30 freebsd_u...@guice.ath.cx wrote:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Guidance with the following:
We are limited to Support for ATA-100/66/33 IDE and ATAPI compliant
devices. With that said, we have our atapi/33 optical on a add in
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, freebsd_u...@guice.ath.cx wrote:
Annotated below ...
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 07:00:30 freebsd_u...@guice.ath.cx wrote:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Guidance with the following:
We are limited to Support for ATA-100/66/33 IDE and ATAPI
partitions, drives and
lines if needed. The positioning always depends on how much
activity you expect on the certain file systems. You did get
this idea already.
Example:
/usr is on prim. master, 2nd partition
/usr/obj is mounted to /var/uobj on sec. master, 2nd partition
You
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
Keep in mind that performance across ad0 and ad2 is best.
Masters are always good. Slaves are slower. Using primary
and secondary in parallel works good, working on a master
and a slave simultanously is worse.
Your
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:07:20 -0500, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Your statement about master being faster than a slave is simply not true for
almost every scenario when using devices with same capabilites. All
master/slave really controls is enumeration, and shouldn't effect
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Guidance with the following:
We are limited to Support for ATA-100/66/33 IDE and ATAPI compliant
devices. With that said, we have our atapi/33 optical on a add in
controller (PCI) and are seeking to place four HDDs on the main boards
controllers. Our dilemma is
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 07:00:30 freebsd_u...@guice.ath.cx wrote:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Guidance with the following:
We are limited to Support for ATA-100/66/33 IDE and ATAPI compliant
devices. With that said, we have our atapi/33 optical on a add in
controller (PCI) and
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
--As of February 27, 2011 12:26:04 AM +, Slawomir Wojtczak is alleged to
have said:
... but none of them seems to work, after installation it hangs at boot
like that: http://ompldr.org/vN2tscQ
--As for the rest, it is
.
I know that there is way to do this on GPT partitions, but I need MBR ones ...
Any help appreciated,
vermaden
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
--As of February 27, 2011 12:26:04 AM +, Slawomir Wojtczak is alleged
to have said:
... but none of them seems to work, after installation it hangs at boot
like that: http://ompldr.org/vN2tscQ
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Hmm. Interesting. I'm having the same result when trying the
Anything interesting happening during your install?
I would say no, everything seems smooth until I try to boot it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
How long are you waiting? What are you booting from?
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Slawomir Wojtczak verma...@gmx.com wrote:
Anything interesting happening during your install?
I would say no, everything seems smooth until I try to boot it.
) which has
a 2.5 TB RAID Array.
It seems impossible to use the Freebsd sysinstall to partition this
raid array disks.
Correct. Currently sysinstall can only perform MBR partitioning
(partitions limited to 2TB max).
You want GPT partitioning.
See gpart(8)
--
Devin
I get an error message when
Hello
I'm trying to install a new server ( HP Proliant 380 G7 ) which has
a 2.5 TB RAID Array.
It seems impossible to use the Freebsd sysinstall to partition this
raid array disks.
I get an error message when running the partitionner
Error mounting /mnt/dev/da1s1e on /mnt/.user : input/output
MBR partitioning
(partitions limited to 2TB max).
You want GPT partitioning.
See gpart(8)
--
Devin
I get an error message when running the partitionner
Error mounting /mnt/dev/da1s1e on /mnt/.user : input/output error
Anyone has infos about this problem ?
Thanks
On 12/01/10 21:23, David DEMELIER wrote:
Yes it is just exercises, I heard bsdlabel was grow up so I wanted to
test, now I don't really understand why it's fixed to 20 only. I also
It turns out that something like 22.75 bsdlabel partition table entries
fit in a 512 byte sector, so this was
Lamaizierepatf...@davenulle.org:
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelierdemelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still
wrote:
2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaizierepatf...@davenulle.org:
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelierdemelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32
...@gmail.com:
On 11/30/10, David DEMELIERdemelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaizierepatf...@davenulle.org:
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelierdemelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +
Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip 9 levels of quoting]
It is hardcoded. Not my code.
Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a bit
ridiculous having to scroll past 50 lines to see a one-line reply :)
--
Bruce Cran
On 1 December 2010 14:13, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +
Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip 9 levels of quoting]
It is hardcoded. Not my code.
Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a bit
ridiculous having to scroll
2010/12/1 krad kra...@gmail.com:
On 1 December 2010 14:13, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:51:48 +
Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip 9 levels of quoting]
It is hardcoded. Not my code.
Could you remember to remove excess quotes please? It's getting a
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd slice.
Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is dedicated
to ZFS
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc.
I thought the limit was 26, as the letters a to z...
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa
On 11/30/10, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd slice.
Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Actually FreeBSD
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs
2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org:
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
On 11/30/10, David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/30 Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org:
Le Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:45:03 +0100,
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice
8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work is
dedicated to ZFS?
hmmm, isn't already done in 8.X ?
from
a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Is there any plan to grow up max partitions or every work
,
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Is there any plan
,
David Demelierdemelier.da...@gmail.com a ecrit :
Hello,
Hello,
We all know that we can only have 8 ufs partitions in one freebsd
slice. Since OpenBSD and NetBSD can support at most 32 partitions
iirc.
I wonder why FreeBSD still lacks more ufs partitions in one slice?
Is there any plan to grow
CyberLeo Kitsana cyber...@cyberleo.net wrote:
... I hope it makes sense!
No problem with the explanation making sense; what I don't follow
is the behavior of bsdlabel. Given the way I set it up this drive
_should_ contain _two_ labels, but for some unfathomable reason
bsdlabel seems to be using
CyberLeo Kitsana cyber...@cyberleo.net wrote:
If the kldstat Id numbers are assigned sequentially, it looks as
if geom_journal got loaded first and this may somehow be related
(although I don't entirely see how -- absent geom_mirror to make
gm0 and its partitions visible, I'd think
On 11/24/2010 04:52 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
It looks to me as if gjournal is confused:
It is not gjournal that is confused; it's bsdlabel. The gjournals lie
entirely within the partitions defined within the bsdlabel, and don't
care about anything outside of that. The ambiguity here
the order of these
settings in loader.conf makes any difference).
If the kldstat Id numbers are assigned sequentially, it looks as
if geom_journal got loaded first and this may somehow be related
(although I don't entirely see how -- absent geom_mirror to make gm0
and its partitions visible, I'd
entirely see how -- absent geom_mirror to make gm0
and its partitions visible, I'd think that geom_journal should not
be able to find its metadata at all).
From what I've found, this is because there is no taste difference
between a bsdlabel on a gmirror and a bsdlabel on a non-mirror.
Since both
On 21 November 2010 06:10, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Is there something wrong with this sequence, in Fixit:
* create a mirror
* partition it with disklabel
* create journals on the partitions
* install
* reboot?
After rebooting, the mirror had disappeared and the journals
seemed
difference).
If the kldstat Id numbers are assigned sequentially, it looks as
if geom_journal got loaded first and this may somehow be related
(although I don't entirely see how -- absent geom_mirror to make gm0
and its partitions visible, I'd think that geom_journal should not
be able to find its
Is there something wrong with this sequence, in Fixit:
* create a mirror
* partition it with disklabel
* create journals on the partitions
* install
* reboot?
After rebooting, the mirror had disappeared and the journals
seemed to exist directly on partitions of the mirror's provider
rather than
Hello,
Could someone advise how one should create 1 unused partition for
upgrading nanobsd in myconf.nano? What variables should I put into the
config file to have a such?
How big it should be for 4GB card?
Also what is the filesystem referred by NANO_DATASIZE variable?
Thanks in advance!
Dimitar
Dnia poniedziałek, 17 maja 2010 o 10:06:05 Dimitar Vassilev napisał(a):
Hello,
Could someone advise how one should create 1 unused partition for
upgrading nanobsd in myconf.nano? What variables should I put into the
config file to have a such?
# Number of code images on media (1 or 2)
Dzienki Maciej :-)
2010/5/17 Maciej Milewski m...@dat.pl:
Dnia poniedziałek, 17 maja 2010 o 10:06:05 Dimitar Vassilev napisał(a):
Hello,
Could someone advise how one should create 1 unused partition for
upgrading nanobsd in myconf.nano? What variables should I put into the
config file to
Sysinstall
with 7 partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/da0s2b (swap)
/dev/da0s2d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2h on /var/log (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev
On 2010/5/2, Christopher Key cj...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
frhed. Next write the data back to the disk:
dd if=/tmp/hdr of=/dev/da0s2
On 2010/5/12, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
obviously this is not the case. So I'll dd the existing partitions to
another drive, use gpart to create enough
2010/5/12 A. Wright and...@qemg.org
On 2010/5/2, Christopher Key cj...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
frhed. Next write the data back to the disk:
dd if=/tmp/hdr of=/dev/da0s2
On 2010/5/12, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
obviously this is not the case. So I'll dd the existing partitions to
another
Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
2010/5/1 Christopher Key cj...@cam.ac.uk
Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
Hi
I'm running 8.0-Release on an external usb hard drive. and have dual-boot
with FreeBSD on da0s2 and Windows XP on da0s1. I made a setup via
Sysinstall
with 7 partitions
Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
Hi
I'm running 8.0-Release on an external usb hard drive. and have dual-boot
with FreeBSD on da0s2 and Windows XP on da0s1. I made a setup via Sysinstall
with 7 partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/da0s2b (swap)
/dev/da0s2d on /var (ufs, local, soft
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 19:44 +0200, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
Hi
I'm running 8.0-Release on an external usb hard drive. and have dual-boot
with FreeBSD on da0s2 and Windows XP on da0s1. I made a setup via Sysinstall
with 7 partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/da0s2b (swap)
/dev
2010/5/1 Christopher Key cj...@cam.ac.uk
Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
Hi
I'm running 8.0-Release on an external usb hard drive. and have dual-boot
with FreeBSD on da0s2 and Windows XP on da0s1. I made a setup via
Sysinstall
with 7 partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev
Hi
I'm running 8.0-Release on an external usb hard drive. and have dual-boot
with FreeBSD on da0s2 and Windows XP on da0s1. I made a setup via Sysinstall
with 7 partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/da0s2b (swap)
/dev/da0s2d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2e on /tmp (ufs
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jon Theil Nielsen jonth...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/4/30
Subject: Re: More than 8 partitions
To: Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com
2010/4/30 Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jon Theil Nielsen jonth...@gmail.com
partitions:
/dev/da0s2a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/da0s2b (swap)
/dev/da0s2d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2h on /var/log (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/da0s2g on /home (ufs, local
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Jon Theil Nielsen jonth...@gmail.com wrote:
So it is *not* possible to have more than 8 partitions? Just a matter of
interest, since I'm experimenting here. But nice to know.
Unlike OpenBSD's disklabel(8) which supports up to 15 partitions, bsdlabel(8)
supports
2010/5/1 C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Jon Theil Nielsen jonth...@gmail.com
wrote:
So it is *not* possible to have more than 8 partitions? Just a matter of
interest, since I'm experimenting here. But nice to know.
Unlike OpenBSD's disklabel(8) which
On Sat, 1 May 2010 02:53:13 +0200, Jon Theil Nielsen jonth...@gmail.com wrote:
But if I look into the source code of bsdlabel
(/usr/src/sbin/bsdlabel/bsdlabel.c), I can see this:
#define MAXPARTITIONS 26
which at least tells me that is has been the *intention* that it should be
possible.
1 - 100 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
