Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Then if it is so unimportant why change it from beastie?
I don't know ... why?
The discussion I've seen has centered on developing a logo, not changing
the cartoon mascot.
I personally don't care about any of it for my own use, as long as the
software remains at the
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
The committers do know about this and are careful about it. You will
note that this is discussed more fully here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/contrib-
how.html
under the section:
New Code or Major Value-Added Packages
I am
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Technically superior products are technically superior because they
have MORE than the customary RD put into them. That makes them MORE
expensive than the median/mediocre products that dominate a market.
Explain Intel.
--
Anthony
On Saturday 12 February 2005 02:07 am, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
The committers do know about this and are careful about it. You
will note that this is discussed more fully here:
Oliver Leitner wrote:
alot of discussions going on the past 48 hours about this topic, i guess
there is alot of room for explanations left, that ppls want to hear, why not
give the ppls that actually stand behind FreeBSD and behind the logo contest
or whatever it is a chance to tell us what
On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:11 pm, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank J. Laszlo writes:
Who says it has to be small?
Business cards and letterheads say that.
Logos are often reproduced at very small sizes, even on large
documents. They often appear in a corner or at the
Joshua Tinnin writes:
Hmmm, let's see, Anthony Atielski, 30 posts on this subject alone, on a
tech help list. Makes you wonder what sort of priorities you have.
At the moment, I'm worried about FreeBSD.
Anyway, if you feel that way then let the thread die, or take it to
-advocacy.
I reply
On Friday 11 February 2005 02:44 pm, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
Hmmm, let's see, Anthony Atielski, 30 posts on this subject alone,
on a tech help list. Makes you wonder what sort of priorities you
have.
At the moment, I'm worried about FreeBSD.
At 2:56 PM -0800 2/11/05, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
On Friday 11 February 2005 02:44 pm, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
Hmmm, let's see, Anthony Atielski, 30 posts on this subject
alone, on a tech help list. Makes you wonder what sort of
priorities you have.
On Friday 11 February 2005 04:36 pm, Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 2:56 PM -0800 2/11/05, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
On Friday 11 February 2005 02:44 pm, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
Hmmm, let's see, Anthony Atielski, 30 posts on this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such
asNetBSD!!!
Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such
asNetBSD!!!
Joshua Tinnin writes:
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:54 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such
asNetBSD!!!
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:06 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such
asNetBSD!!!
Bart Silverstrim writes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vonleigh
Simmons
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:38 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such
asNetBSD!!!
As an artist here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 07:09 pm, - wrote:
http://www.petitiononline.com/fbsdmsc1/petition.html
Julien Gabel wrote:
See the thread The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public
competition for the new logo design. in -advocacy - I've
already replied with my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/09/05 09:45 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC sat at the
`puter and typed:
Yes, but business is why Microsoft Windows (*) sucks old rocks.
Microsoft is in business to make money, not better software. I was
always under the impression that while the FreeBSD
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
And, I am also concerned about the historical revisionists who
are claiming FreeBSD never had a logo. That is hogwash.
Where can I see the logo?
Nobody ever said that FreeBSD lacked a logo until after a few days ago
when this ill-conceived competition was leaked -
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Yep, I was wondering how long it would take before someone figured
this one out. We know the real rea$on$ that this logo change is
being contemplated, don't we.
Personally, I wonder how FreeBSD survives based exclusively on volunteer
efforts. It's a noble idea, but
Anthony Atkielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050210 20:34]:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Yep, I was wondering how long it would take before someone figured
this one out. We know the real rea$on$ that this logo change is
being contemplated, don't we.
Personally, I wonder how FreeBSD survives
David Gerard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050210 20:41]:
I'd rather see effort towards some of the really *stupid* bugs in 5.x that
languish for months with a fix included. Like linux-pango being broken,
meaning that by default you can't actually run a lot of recent Linux
binaries (a Thunderbird
Anthony Atkielski writes:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
And, I am also concerned about the historical revisionists who
are claiming FreeBSD never had a logo. That is hogwash.
Where can I see the logo?
Nobody ever said that FreeBSD lacked a logo until after a few days ago
when this
Eric Kjeldergaard writes:
The logo can be seen on the website www.freeBSD.org. it is in fact a
relatively (from a printing perspective) high-resolution image of our
daemon, holding a pitchfork on his left side. He is slightly facing
forward, though looks off somewhat to the right. I know,
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Eric Kjeldergaard writes:
The logo can be seen on the website www.freeBSD.org. it is in fact a
relatively (from a printing perspective) high-resolution image of our
daemon, holding a pitchfork on his left side. He is slightly facing
forward, though looks off somewhat
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:09:47 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Kjeldergaard writes:
The logo can be seen on the website www.freeBSD.org. it is in fact a
relatively (from a printing perspective) high-resolution image of our
daemon, holding a pitchfork on his left
On 02/10/05 12:55 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt sat at the `puter and typed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/09/05 09:45 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC sat at the
`puter and typed:
Yes, but business is why Microsoft Windows (*) sucks old rocks.
Microsoft is in business to make money, not better
On 02/10/05 10:30 AM, Anthony Atkielski sat at the `puter and typed:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
And, I am also concerned about the historical revisionists who
are claiming FreeBSD never had a logo. That is hogwash.
Where can I see the logo?
Nobody ever said that FreeBSD lacked a logo
On 02/10/05 08:03 AM, Eric Kjeldergaard sat at the `puter and typed:
Anthony Atkielski writes:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
And, I am also concerned about the historical revisionists who
are claiming FreeBSD never had a logo. That is hogwash.
Where can I see the logo?
Nobody
Frank Laszlo writes:
you are all looking at a web graphic. Allready rendered as process
colors. Its impossible to say how many printing plates its on.
Process is always four plates, except for the rare hexachrome offset, which
is six plates.
Spot colors require one plate per color. Two-color
* Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0255 08:55]:
Yep, I was wondering how long it would take before someone figured
this one out. We know the real rea$on$ that this logo change is
being contemplated, don't we.
You seem to think you do, certainly. Why don't you ask core instead of
Louis LeBlanc writes:
Neutrality is purely objective in this case (and many others).
Uninformed neutrality can be highly inflammatory. Beastie is only
considered inflammatory to those uninformed fundamentalists who
haven't been satisfied beating down every other freedom in this
country and
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Frank Laszlo writes:
you are all looking at a web graphic. Allready rendered as process
colors. Its impossible to say how many printing plates its on.
Process is always four plates, except for the rare hexachrome offset, which
is six plates.
Spot colors require one
Frank Laszlo writes:
Yes, Process colors being 4 plates, but rendered properly, it could be
less.
All process printing requires four (or six) colors. That's what process
means.
The current logo as it is shown on freebsd.org, COULD be printed on 2
plates, as a 2 color job. those colors being
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Frank Laszlo writes:
Yes, Process colors being 4 plates, but rendered properly, it could be
less.
All process printing requires four (or six) colors. That's what process
means.
The current logo as it is shown on freebsd.org, COULD be printed on 2
plates, as a 2
alot of discussions going on the past 48 hours about this topic, i guess
there is alot of room for explanations left, that ppls want to hear, why not
give the ppls that actually stand behind FreeBSD and behind the logo contest
or whatever it is a chance to tell us what they where thinking about
Frank J. Laszlo writes:
Who says it has to be small?
Business cards and letterheads say that.
Logos are often reproduced at very small sizes, even on large documents.
They often appear in a corner or at the bottom of a page. Logos are not
used in place of cover art, but they often are a
36 matches
Mail list logo
