Re: Firewall with 3 NIC (1 wireless) problem

2006-05-26 Thread Dennis Olvany

Mark Moellering wrote:
	I am attempting to add a wireless capabilities to an existing network / 
firewall structure.  I added a wireless NIC card to the firewall (Netgear 
WPN311) and followed the wireless instructions.  I also added a similar card 
to an existing computer (Netgear WG311T).
	The Firewall's internal wired network is on 192.168.1.1 and the Wireless card 
is set to 192.168.2.1
	The client computer can find the wireless network and I can ping the wireless 
card (192.168.2.1)  However, I can get nowhere else.  I cannot get to the 
wired subnet nor outside access to the internet.  I tried adding a bridge 
from the wired to the wireless network interfaces but that did nothing.  I 
tried putting the wireless Nic to 192.168.1.249 but that made things worse.  
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
	Both client and firewall are running Freebsd 6.1  Relevant (that I can think 
of) files from the firewall are included...


The bridge is not necessary. If you're trying to make all the traffic 
traverse the wireless network, you'll have to change the default gateway 
on the client. Otherwise the traffic will traverse bge0 as indicated in 
the client routing table. Otherwise, I would examine the firewall. 
Change it to allow all traffic and see if that makes a difference. 
Verify that your nat configuration is correct.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall with 3 NIC (1 wireless) problem

2006-05-25 Thread Mark Moellering
Dennis,

Thanks so much for your help.  Here is the ifconfig -v and netstat (a 
variety) from both the client and firewall.  
Both the client and the firewall have an ath0 (192.168.2.1 for 
firewall, 
192.168.2.5 for the client) and a bge0 (192.168.1.1 for firewall, 192.168.1.2 
for client).  After booting the client, I disconnect the ethernet cable on 
the bge0 interface to force traffic over the wireless ath0.  
I am by no means a professional, I may have missed something or be 
doing 
something fairly obviously wrong.

Thanks Again,

Mark Moellering

On Thursday 25 May 2006 12:17 am, Dennis Olvany wrote:
  net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
  net.link.ether.bridge.config=bge0, ath0

 Let's have a look at ifconfig and netstat -r. Whats with this bridge?
 Think you'd be better off without it.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Script started on Thu May 25 22:19:06 2006
AlphaOne# ifconfig -v
bge0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=1bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING
inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe20:aa23%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 
inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 00:09:5b:20:aa:23
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
status: no carrier
ath0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::214:6cff:fe2c:a8c0%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 
inet 192.168.2.5 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
ether 00:14:6c:2c:a8:c0
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/24Mbps)
status: associated
ssid psyberation channel 1 (2412) bssid 00:0f:b5:8a:77:44
authmode WPA privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF
TKIP 2:128-bit
TKIP 3:128-bit powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 txpowmax 37
txpower 63 rtsthreshold 2346 mcastrate 1 fragthreshold 2346 -pureg
protmode CTS -wme burst roaming MANUAL bintval 100 -countermeasures
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 
AlphaOne# exit
exit

Script done on Thu May 25 22:19:37 2006
Script started on Thu May 25 22:20:31 2006
AlphaOne# netstat
Active UNIX domain sockets
Address  Type   Recv-Q Send-QInode Conn Refs  Nextref Addr
c3e912bc stream  0  00 c3db97a800 
/tmp/ksocket-Mark/kontactHOPVSF.slave-socket
c3db97a8 stream  0  00 c3e912bc00
c3db9dac stream  0  00 c3db9c0800 
/tmp/ksocket-Mark/kontactpn6RzM.slave-socket
c3db9c08 stream  0  00 c3db9dac00
c3d2d7a8 stream  0  00 c3db9c9400 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3db9c94 stream  0  00 c3d2d7a800
c3d2d834 stream  0  00 c3db9e3800 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/646
c3db9e38 stream  0  00 c3d2d83400
c3db9af0 stream  0  00 c3db983400 
/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
c3db9834 stream  0  00 c3db9af000
c3db9604 stream  0  00 c3db969000 
/tmp/ksocket-Mark/klaunchersC8lmq.slave-socket
c3db9690 stream  0  00 c3db960400
c3db98c0 stream  0  00 c3db994c00 
/tmp/fam-Mark/fam-
c3db994c stream  0  00 c3db98c000
c3e91348 stream  0  00 c3e913d400 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3e913d4 stream  0  00 c3e9134800
c3e91460 stream  0  00 c3e914ec00 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3e914ec stream  0  00 c3e9146000
c3e91578 stream  0  00 c3e9160400 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3e91604 stream  0  00 c3e9157800
c3e91690 stream  0  00 c3e9171c00 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3e9171c stream  0  00 c3e9169000
c3db9230 stream  0  00 c3db92bc00 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3db92bc stream  0  00 c3db923000
c3d2dd20 stream  0  00 c3d2dc0800 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/dcop625-1148609162
c3d2dc08 stream  0  00 c3d2dd2000
c3d2ddac stream  0  00 c3d2d71c00 
/tmp/.ICE-unix/646
c3d2d71c stream  0  00 c3d2ddac00
c368dc94 stream  0  00 c368dc0800 

RE: Firewall with 3 NIC (1 wireless) problem

2006-05-24 Thread fbsd
This may be a wild shot in the dark.
Netgear WPN311  WG311T are both CLIENT RangeMax Wireless PCI
Adapter cards.
Looks to me like you are missing hardware needed to make your wanted
wireless network to work.

On your wired LAN you cable a Nic card in your gateway box to
a hub/router/switch through which all other PC's on the LAN are
connected into.

A wireless system works much the same way. Your gateway box should
have a Nic cabled to an wireless base/router through which all other
PC's on the wireless LAN broadcast/communicate with.

You need a Netgear RangeMax Wireless Router WPN824 which is a
stand-a-lone piece of equipment cabled to your gateway box. The
Netgear WPN311 card you have in the gateway box is useless. Use it
for some other PC you want on your wireless LAN.

Please take note that the built in hardware wireless wep/wpa
encryption security is a laugh. Any body with some free software off
the internet can drive down your street and pick up your wireless
base broadcast and gain access to your network and the public
internet through you if you only rely on wep/wpa encryption for
access security. There are many solutions out there. Review the
questions list archives on wireless security for many suggestion on
how to protect your wireless network.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark
Moellering
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:33 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Firewall with 3 NIC (1 wireless) problem


I am attempting to add a wireless capabilities to an existing
network /
firewall structure.  I added a wireless NIC card to the firewall
(Netgear
WPN311) and followed the wireless instructions.  I also added a
similar card
to an existing computer (Netgear WG311T).
The Firewall's internal wired network is on 192.168.1.1 and the
Wireless card
is set to 192.168.2.1
The client computer can find the wireless network and I can ping
the wireless
card (192.168.2.1)  However, I can get nowhere else.  I cannot get
to the
wired subnet nor outside access to the internet.  I tried adding a
bridge
from the wired to the wireless network interfaces but that did
nothing.  I
tried putting the wireless Nic to 192.168.1.249 but that made things
worse.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Both client and firewall are running Freebsd 6.1  Relevant (that I
can think
of) files from the firewall are included...

Thanks in Advance.

Mark

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall with 3 NIC (1 wireless) problem

2006-05-24 Thread Dennis Olvany

net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
net.link.ether.bridge.config=bge0, ath0


Let's have a look at ifconfig and netstat -r. Whats with this bridge? 
Think you'd be better off without it.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]