exactly* what I did. It was something like pointing mailer.conf to my
own program which did some logging and then called the real sendmail.
Actually, I might just have hacked mailwrapper directly. I think there
was some way I managed to cross-reference to the httpd logs, or that
might be what I
Hi Glenn,
I once wrote some (quick-and-dirty) perl script that monitors network
traffic and logs (for matching outgoing connections) the process command
line and (if apache) the respective vhost and request.
But this would not help if they are calling the sendmail program directly to
inject
So, some idiot is using a cgi or php or something to send mail out of his
website that he shouldn't be sending. With a bunch of sites on the server,
can't tell who.
System accounting can tell me that sendmail was executed 32,976 times, but
is there a way to tell what process
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at t
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempt
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the att
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
> reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
> so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
> notes the attempted user name, not the IP of origin
origin.
I don't use sendmail, but aren't the login attempts at least logged in
maillog as well? If so, you could use fail2ban to ban them. We do this
with postfix/exim/dovecot/etc.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Jun 4, 2013 9:00 AM, "Tim Daneliuk" wrote:
>
> I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
> reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
> so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
> notes the attempted user name, not the IP of origin
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name, not the IP of origin.
--
---
On Sun, 26 May 2013 21:31:09 -0600, Modulok wrote:
> >> Everything to the right of the @ is indeed case insensitive, but
> >> everything
> >> to the left might be case sensitive, depending on local policy. This
> >> means
> >> you must preserve the case of everything to the left of the @ sign.
> >
>> Everything to the right of the @ is indeed case insensitive, but
>> everything
>> to the left might be case sensitive, depending on local policy. This
>> means
>> you must preserve the case of everything to the left of the @ sign.
>
> According to the link provided by Erich Dollansky, FreeBSD's
it seems that my memory about
the valid definition has changed to what is reality today,
i. e. sendmail "rewriting" uppercase to lowercase prior to
further processing.
> The local part of an address (before the @ sign) is case-sensitive (with
> the exception of postmas..
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:44:41 -0600, Modulok wrote:
> > I know usernames are case-sensitive, I thought emails were
> > too.
>
> If I remember e-mail basics correctly: No. They're not.
> For example, f...@example.com, f...@example.com and f...@e
t two distinguishable users are intended), but
regarding mail... that sounds problematic.
> Without fighting an epic battle with with the sendmail configs, is
> there a simple way to make this work?
Use lowercase usernames only. Make it a convention.
Verify it.
> The obvious answer is
Hi,
On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:44:41 -0600
Modulok wrote:
> List,
>
> Step1: Make a new user::
>
> root@localhost# pw useradd foo -m -s /bin/tcsh -h 0
> password for user foo: (secret)
>
> Step 2: Does sendmail know them::
>
> root@modunix# sendma
List,
Step1: Make a new user::
root@localhost# pw useradd foo -m -s /bin/tcsh -h 0
password for user foo: (secret)
Step 2: Does sendmail know them::
root@modunix# sendmail -bv foo@localhost
foo@localhost... deliverable: mailer local, user foo
# Good...
Step 3: Make a new
2013-04-27 18:43, doug skrev:
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
Only if it is listed in /etc/mail/access file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 27/04/2013 17:43, doug wrote:
>>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
> If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
> who can reach that port.
You see where it says 'M=E' in that DAEMON_OPTIONS line? That
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunate
t=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
>
Thanks Matthew. Your second suggestion solved it for me. No default and I
still have sendmail listening on port 1025 so it's just what I wanted.
'Wish I understood everything I know about that.'
--
Jim Flowers
___
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
> All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
> sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
> which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
>
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
to figure out how to turn off the default. Sockstat sh
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
>
> fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ... Domain of sender
> address ad...@system.mail does not exist
Add FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains) to your sendmail configuration.
--
Christian "
From free...@edvax.de Fri Mar 8 07:50:06 2013
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:55:57 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> And Matthias already helped me sort it out.
Could you write to the list how you solved the problem?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-Ma
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:55:57 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> And Matthias already helped me sort it out.
Could you write to the list how you solved the problem?
I think it would be interesting to those running into
similar problems.
I remember that in the end, my "clever" solution involved
loggin
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:48:45 -0700
From: Chad Perrin
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fetchmail/sendmail: Domain of sender address does not exist
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:40:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:40:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm running sendmail, and using fetchmail to fetch
> my mail from the university IMAP server.
>
> I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
>
> fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ... Domain of sender
> addr
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:40:47 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> How do I set fetchmail and sendmail to fetch
> such emails?
Maybe it helps if you add the options "fetchall flush" to
your .fetchmailrc configuration file? I've had a similar
problem some years ago and I think this
I'm running sendmail, and using fetchmail to fetch
my mail from the university IMAP server.
I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ... Domain of sender
address ad...@system.mail does not exist
And this is doubled in /var/log/maillog:
sm-mta[14642]: r270BO3L0
12 amd64
>
> "make buildworld" fails with this:
>
>
> cc -O -pipe -g -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
> -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB -DNIS
> -DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DDNSMAP -DNETINET6
all the options, but
for sendmail only the last 2 are significant...
It works for me
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
"make buildworld" fails with this:
cc -O -pipe -g -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DN
2013-02-14 03:07, Chris Maness skrev:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
wrote:
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
That looks like would only take care of o
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>
>> dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
>> on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
>>
>
>
> Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf might be sim
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
> on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
>
Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf might be simplest
solution.
Peter
_
2013-02-13 06:30, Chris Maness skrev:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
>> I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
>> I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
>> not have access
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
> I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
> not have access to the i-net. I think I remember reading that it is
> possible for the i-
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net. I think I remember reading that it is
possible for the i-net attached sendmail to relay mail for a domain to
another host. Is
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jan 10 17:04:06 2013
> From: Robert Huff
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:00:42 -0500
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: sendmail not working
>
>
> Karl Vogel writes:
>
> > R> After looking into
.3.
This is (obviously) not the final solution, and I am trying to
figure out how to recompile mail.local to fix this. Recompiling all
of sendmail didn't seem to catch it
Thanks,
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@f
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:30:01 -0500,
>> Robert Huff said:
R> After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
R> However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
R> "accepting connections", but maillog is still full of:
R> jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r0
es.
b) if yes, how long did you wait for the banner?
(if there's a DNS problem, it can be 90 seconds befre the banner line)
Good catch - yes sendmail does seem to be hooked to port 25.
Jan 8 10:12:44 jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: forward
/home/huff/.forward.jer
Progress has been made.
After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
"accepting connections", but maillog is still full of:
jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: smtpquit: mailer
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 11:12:57 2013
> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:09:36 -0500
> From: Robert Huff
> To: Robert Bonomi
> Subject: Re: sendmail not working
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>
> On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi wrot
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
>> WHAT HAPPENS when you 'telnet' to your mailserver port(s) and try
>> doing smtp transaction(s) manually?
>
> I don't get the SMTP prompt.
OK, so sendmail either isn't starting, isn't binding to
On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port. Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either
way. /var/log/maillog has this:
No clue, except the first message might be saying it's not going to
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 07:43:00 2013
> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:39:39 -0500
> From: Robert Huff
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, free...@dreamchaser.org,
> Robert Huff
> Subject: Re: sendmail not working
>
> On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary
On 08.01.2013 07:39, Robert Huff wrote:
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way.
/var/log/maillog has this
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way. /var/log/maillog
has this:
Jan 7 21:07:42 jerusalem sm-mta[69792
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> On a system running:
>
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
>
> I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl
> port.
> Sendmail starts, but no mail is process
Any more thoughts on the problem?
(I send a previous follow-up, but I'm not sure it got out.)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
On 1/5/2013 8:55 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
Base sendmail doesn't link with sasl by default. If you had edited
Makefiles or make.conf to enable that, running "make clean all install
clean" in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/ should build and install just the new
sendmail. Or, if you ha
.2" to ",3". This appears to break
> >> sendmail in at least two places.
> >>
> >> I have added a mapping in libmap.conf ... which seems to work
> >> ... but I'm pretty sure that's Not The Right Thing.
> >> What is?
> >
&g
On 1/5/2013 8:30 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from ".2" to ",3". This appears to break
sendmail in at least two places.
I
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
> I have followed the canonical procedure to get Sendmail to use
> SASL.
> Yesterday this worked.
> This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
> bumps the library version from ".2"
I have followed the canonical procedure to get Sendmail to use
SASL.
Yesterday this worked.
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from ".2" to ",3". This appears to break
sendmail in at least two pla
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask?
It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain
specified with a trailing dot, since I thought that was how one specified a
fully q
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:19 -0600
> From: Gary Aitken
> Subject: sendmail local-host-names questions
>
>
> Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the
> local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, and
> it does
don't put dots at the end of the domain names in that file. In
mine, i've just got:
kontrol.kode5.net # the hostname of the machine; and
kode5.net # my domain
I haven't put those comments in it either, just the host and domain information.
The Sendmail site does have
ic
Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: SYSERR(root):
savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere
Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask?
It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a dom
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
> From: AN
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help
>
> FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-
AN writes:
> I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The
> problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I
> send or receive email. I would like the server to do the
> following:
This has been running fine for years on one of
the above). At least, that's how I do it.
or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and
implement content filters.
depends of who is talking and how "easiness" is defined.
Postfix is different. That's all.
___
freebsd-quest
[ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ]
> On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
> >FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
> >Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
> >r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> >
>
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon
Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or
Perhaps that should be "WORKING AGAIN" because I'm not sure I
did anything to actually fix the problem.
In any event: thanks.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On 10/08/2012 14:32, Robert Huff wrote:
> I have restarted sendmail and get this in /var/log/messages:
>
> Aug 10 08:26:56 jerusalem sm-mta[87853]: sql_select option missing
> Aug 10 08:26:56 jerusalem sm-mta[87853]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism
> available
>
>
I have a machine (call it ADAM) running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jul 24 08:55:46 EDT 2012 amd64
which has had no change to the mail components since that
time.
Approximately 12 hours ago, something in sendmail broke.
Symptoms:
1) It works as a
On 02/08/2012 16:07, Mervyn Passmore wrote:
> We've made & installed 8.14.5 and both the new and old versions seem to be
> installed and running according to PS. Whatever is starting sendmail is
> initiating the old version.
If you're replacing the system sendmail with
Hi,
Hope someone can help. we're stuck trying to update Sendmail from 8.14.3 to
8.14.5
We've made & installed 8.14.5 and both the new and old versions seem to be
installed and running according to PS. Whatever is starting sendmail is
initiating the old version.
How can we rem
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Darren Pilgrim writes:
I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but
that left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is
the list I have so far:
/etc/mail/* (excl
Darren Pilgrim writes:
> I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
> WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but
> that left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is
> the list I have so far:
>
> /etc/mail/*
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:16:33 -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> Even though I have WITHOUT_SENDMAIL specified and the world was built
> with that, mergemaster still installs /etc/mail/aliases and
> /etc/rc.d/sendmail. Is there a way to prevent this other than adding
> them to IGN
I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but that
left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is the list
I have so far:
/etc/mail/* (excluding mailer.conf)
/etc/rc.d/sendmail
/us
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
>> From: Mark Felder
>> Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
>&g
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
> From: Mark Felder
> Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
>
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the ent
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
> that came with the system; it's ignored.
Thanks! (Thanks too to the other responders.)
Looks li
; and use, and the second is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
> installed and do not use.
>
> It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
> the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
> Sendmail?
BSD Unix
During subsequent system upgrades, of you build from source, you should
watch out for thus during the mergemaster piece.
Brian
On Jun 22, 2012 11:44 AM, "Matthew Seaman" wrote:
> On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
> > It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the b
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
> It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
> the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
> Sendmail?
You don't need to remove the base system sendmail. All you need t
A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
and use, and the second is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
instal
_
Have you added this to /etc/make.cnf?
WITH_SENDMAIL_PORT= yes
Yes, I have
So if you go into
/usr/ports/mail/sendmail and:
# make config
You will be able to enable tls and sasl2 (amongst a whole bunch of other
stuff) giving you the correct functionality.
No, this is not give me
On 15/06/2012 13:17, Andrey S. Rybak wrote:
> i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
> every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
> port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
> There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+s
Andrey S. Rybak wrote:
hello!
i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+sasl, install
milter-greylist
hello!
i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+sasl, install
milter-greylist, deinstall sendmail and
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:49:43 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> If I leave the root exposed, the From
> field looks e.g. r...@mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk,
> which is rejected by the university mailer,
> because it has no knowledge of this address.
You should be able to use sendmail's masquerading
I've a problem with sendmail setup,
for which I have no satisfactory solution.
I've several hosts, all on the university
network. I'd like to forward all root's mail
from all these hosts to my personal email.
The problem seems to be with the From field.
If I leave the ro
On 12/04/2012 14:40, Ian Lord wrote:
>> What are the permissions on /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail ? They should
>> >look like this:
>> >% ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
>> >-r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 662136 Apr 1 08:38
>> >/usr/libexec/sendmail
>You should not be changing the ownership and permissions on any of the
>directories used by sendmail(8), or the group membership of any of the
>groups used by sendmail. Not even if you think you know what you are
>doing. This is extremely security sensitive, and getting it wro
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:17:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
> >> > I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
> >> > Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NO
On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
>> > I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
>> > Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
>> > to queue directory /var/spool/clien
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
> I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
> Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write to
> queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
> Permission denied
>
>
Hi,
I am trying to use sendmail to send emails from a php script (I tried
phpmailer and mail function with the same result).
I always got messages like "Could not execute: /usr/sbin/sendmail"
Sendmail is World executable:
# ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Ja
ng
> >a real MTA like Sendmail or Postfix.
>
> If it is simple then it's no fun ;)
>
Heh, true that.
--
Without ice cream life and fame are meaningless.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
> >
> > I'm sorry for jumping into this thread,
>
> Don't be sorry for that.
>
> > but verify=FAIL is expected
> > unless you have your ISP's certificate chain stored in the appropriate
> > directory with the ap
S
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250 DSN
> starttls
> 220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
>
> > http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/freebsd/sendmail.html
>
> That is a good site. Learnt me how to build sendmail at least.
--
+---+-
1 - 100 of 3059 matches
Mail list logo
