At 09:11 PM 11/21/2003, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Which shell are you using?
C shell. Maybe I should switch to Bash? I mostly ssh in using my user acct
and then have at least one screen session where I su to root. However to
the extent that I'd like to write shell scripts that are
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:44:30 -0500
Marty Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED] granted us these pearls of wisdom:
At 09:11 PM 11/21/2003, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Which shell are you using?
C shell. Maybe I should switch to Bash? I mostly ssh in using my user acct
and then have at least
At 10:39 AM 11/22/2003, Scott W wrote:
I know there are some people that refuse to use anything other than
csh/tcsh, but when it comes down to writing shell scripts going out to
customers, or part of any software, you write for sh.or if Linux only,
for bash.
Why can't we all just get
I wanted to look at a file and figured why not pipe the output of which to
more, which of course didn't work so I figured if I backticked the which
output with more in front that would work, and apparently it does (though
I'm not sure that the cmd itself wasn't executed?).
e.g. more `which
On Friday, Nov 21, 2003, at 16:44 Europe/London, Marty Landman wrote:
I wanted to look at a file and figured why not pipe the output of
which to more, which of course didn't work so I figured if I
backticked the which output with more in front that would work, and
apparently it does (though
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:44:22AM -0500, Marty Landman wrote:
I wanted to look at a file and figured why not pipe the output of which to
more, which of course didn't work so I figured if I backticked the which
output with more in front that would work, and apparently it does (though
I'm
Marty Landman wrote:
I wanted to look at a file and figured why not pipe the output of
which to more, which of course didn't work so I figured if I
backticked the which output with more in front that would work, and
apparently it does (though I'm not sure that the cmd itself wasn't
At 08:40 PM 11/21/2003, Scott W wrote:
So yep, it's doing what you want, the way you wanted to...use something
similar fairly often myself, although note that the 'current' standard for
executing commands is now $(cmd), eg
more $(which apachectl)
I get
FreeB more $(which apachectl)
Illegal
Marty Landman wrote:
At 08:40 PM 11/21/2003, Scott W wrote:
So yep, it's doing what you want, the way you wanted to...use
something similar fairly often myself, although note that the
'current' standard for executing commands is now $(cmd), eg
more $(which apachectl)
I get
FreeB more
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:04:43 -0500, Scott W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marty Landman wrote:
At 08:40 PM 11/21/2003, Scott W wrote:
So yep, it's doing what you want, the way you wanted to...use
something similar fairly often myself, although note that the
'current' standard for
Marty Landman wrote:
At 08:40 PM 11/21/2003, Scott W wrote:
So yep, it's doing what you want, the way you wanted to...use
something similar fairly often myself, although note that the
'current' standard for executing commands is now $(cmd), eg
more $(which apachectl)
I get
FreeB more
11 matches
Mail list logo
