anyone uses fsck_y_enable=YES ?

2003-07-14 Thread Edy Lie
Do you guys use this option ? Is it any useful ? Thanks! -- In the windoze world, I am limited by the tools that I can use, In Unix, I am limited by my own wisdom. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: anyone uses fsck_y_enable=YES ?

2003-07-14 Thread Michal F. Hanula
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:28:55PM +0800, Edy Lie wrote: Do you guys use this option ? Is it any useful ? I remember a server in a hospital across the town that had no UPS and went down about once a week due to the backup generator tests (they just

Re: anyone uses fsck_y_enable=YES ?

2003-07-14 Thread Andrea Venturoli
** Reply to note from Michal F. Hanula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:33:05 +0200 Do you guys use this option ? Yes. Is it any useful ? Spared me 30 km in hurry many times. bye av. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: anyone uses fsck_y_enable=YES ?

2003-07-14 Thread Steve Coile
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Andrea Venturoli wrote: [...] Do you guys use this option ? Yes. Has anyone run into a situation where you'd answer no to an fsck question? In what circumstances would you not answer yes? I can't remember ever answering no to fsck: if you do, you'll still have an

Re: anyone uses fsck_y_enable=YES ?

2003-07-14 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Andrea Venturoli wrote: [...] Do you guys use this option ? Yes. Has anyone run into a situation where you'd answer no to an fsck question? In what circumstances would you not answer yes? I can't remember ever answering no to fsck: if you do, you'll still