Actually, a Wake-On-LAN feature is not at all necessary for me in this
case. It's a simple enough task to just trigger a backup manually at the
command line via a script that automates the process.
still. a separate wol tool is available in ports. You may easily construct
shell script that will
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:17:36AM +0200, herbert langhans wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:10:06AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >lftp does work incremental. Take a look at Chad's posting again and read
> > >what he needs. And of course, ftp via ssh is nothing new ...
>
> > still - any ftp
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:46:02AM -0400, Jorge Luis Gonzalez wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > what exactly deficiences and requirements not met by rsync are you talking
> > about?
>
> Perhaps "deficiencies" was too strong a word. I think the OP required--or
> perhaps desired--a WOL func
Thanks for pointing out that there are Windows ports of rsync, and that you
provide examples of their use. I'm not sure I would entrust my system backups
to them if they come with the disclaimer that you've "no idea how stable and
usable they are."
http://justinsomnia.org/2007/02/how-to-regular
you mean "wake on lan"? there is "wol" tool in ports.
proper. I meant, too, that dirvish, which was the alternative that I
recommended, presents an elegant and easily-comprehended way to manage rsync's
considerable abilities, not that it provides features that can't be managed
directly by rsync.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> what exactly deficiences and requirements not met by rsync are you talking
> about?
>
Perhaps "deficiencies" was too strong a word. I think the OP required--or
perhaps desired--a WOL function. I'm not aware of any such capability in rsync
proper. I meant, too, that di
PXE booting gives a lot of possibilities. I use it to boot Clonezilla to
back up Windows systems. That is better than dd, since only used disk blocks
ntfsclone is what you need. for sure simpler.
For FreeBSD and other open operating systems, sysutils/rsnapshot is a
what is exactly rsnapsh
what exactly deficiences and requirements not met by rsync are you talking
about?
simplifications of rsync's ability to exclude files or directories, elegant
handling of backups' expirations) are sufficient to make it a worthy
alternative to naked rsync. The frontend is written in Perl and eas
Wojciech Puchar:
> >
> >Hmm, I'm not sure that there is _anything_ that meets _all_ your criteria!
>
> rsync meets. It can be a little harder with windoze, with any unix-like OS
> it will work.
>
rsync, or some front-end to rsync, is indeed probably the best option, though
it lacks several of t
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 02:37 23/06/2012, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used
for
> > back
a) activate PXE/WOL on bios
b) start the laptop via PXE using a freebsd/linux/whatever_os_you_want_to_use
c) use dd piped to rsync to make the backups
not really efficient but working.
ntfsprogs from ports can be helpful. you may use ntfsmount and access NTFS
files directly.
if backup is do
still - any ftp client will no go faster than ftp protocol allows.
That's sure. But I think it's an option for the laptops what Chad
only if $HOME directly or part of it is copied and nothing more
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
At 02:37 23/06/2012, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:10:06AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >lftp does work incremental. Take a look at Chad's posting again and read
> >what he needs. And of course, ftp via ssh is nothing new ...
> still - any ftp client will no go faster than ftp protocol allows.
That's sure. But I thin
lftp does work incremental. Take a look at Chad's posting again and read
what he needs. And of course, ftp via ssh is nothing new ...
still - any ftp client will no go faster than ftp protocol allows.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
lftp does work incremental. Take a look at Chad's posting again and read
what he needs. And of course, ftp via ssh is nothing new ...
Cheers
herb langhans
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:22:04AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:49:39 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > Maybe
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:49:39 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Maybe take a look at lftp, at the mirror option. For basic demands its a
> > compact solution.
>
> try doing backup of things with 1 dirs and million files and certainly
> you will understand you need rsync.
In addition to
Hmm, I'm not sure that there is _anything_ that meets _all_ your criteria!
rsync meets. It can be a little harder with windoze, with any unix-like OS
it will work.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:37:17PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > > backing up laptops, whic
Maybe take a look at lftp, at the mirror option. For basic demands its a
compact solution.
try doing backup of things with 1 dirs and million files and certainly
you will understand you need rsync.
ftp protocol is plain bad for that.
___
freebsd
Maybe take a look at lftp, at the mirror option. For basic demands its a
compact solution.
Cheers
herb langhans
--
sprachtraining langhans
herbert langhans, warschau
herbert.raimund[at]gmx.net
herbert[at]langhans.com.pl
http://www.langhans.com.pl
+0048 603 341 441
| jabber:herbs
| icq:41450086
My criteria for procedures are:
1. They should minimize the need for additional software beyond the base
system as much as reasonably possible. This means not only that I do not
good idea.
3. They should provide for incremental backups.
do backed up laptops use FreeBSD or have another fil
Bacula is the tool
Enviado desde mi iPod
El 22/06/2012, a las 8:31 p.m., "Chad Perrin"
escribió:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:14:34PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:14:34PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> > kind of schedule, so
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
> cron or other schedule
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> > kind of schedule, s
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
> cron or other sc
I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
cron or other scheduled procedures. I'm trying to decide on what tools
to use for ma
28 matches
Mail list logo
