On Thursday 23 November 2006 16:00, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 11/23/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array
>
> Maybe you'll be able to create graid3 with md0 as
> the third member (based on sparse file for example)
> and later emulate
On Thursday 23 November 2006 17:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > is the loss of your data worth less than the cost of an extra hd? if
> > so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install?
>
> should read:
> is the cost of an extra hd less than the value of your data/install? if
> so, buy anothe
is the loss of your data worth less than the cost of an extra hd? if
so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install?
should read:
is the cost of an extra hd less than the value of your data/install? if
so, buy another hd. if not, make a clean install?
regards,
usleep
__
John,
On 11/23/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array with only two (or one
less than the planned total) providers? I'm asking since I would like to
move from my current one-disk setup to a three-disk raid3 array, but I'd
like the disk curr
On 11/23/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array
Maybe you'll be able to create graid3 with md0 as
the third member (based on sparse file for example)
and later emulate a failure (md0 disappears) and
insert your hard drive.
Is it possible to create a (degraded) graid3 array with only two (or one
less than the planned total) providers? I'm asking since I would like to
move from my current one-disk setup to a three-disk raid3 array, but I'd
like the disk currently in use to be a member of the array and I don't have
