Re: dump locks again [SOLVED]

2008-08-19 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Kris Kennaway ha scritto:

Andrea Venturoli wrote:

Kris Kennaway ha scritto:

This was fixed in 7.0-STABLE.


I confirm upgrading to 7.0-STABLE solved this.

 Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


dump locks again

2008-08-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Hello.
I googled around for this but found only very old threads (from 2005 or so).

I'm taking dumps of a new box I build, which runs 7.0/amd64 on 8 cores 
with harware RAID-5 (ciss driver).


This is an example of the command I issue:

dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr

Almost always, the dump process will work up to Pass IV (regular files), 
but then stuck there.


# ps ax|grep dump
11400  p1  I+ 0:00.97 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11405  p1  I+ 0:00.18 dump: /dev/da0s1e: pass 4: 4.28% done, 
finished in 0:03 at Fri Aug  8 10:35:34 2008 (dump)
11406  p1  I+ 0:00.24 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11407  p1  I+ 0:00.24 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11408  p1  I+ 0:00.23 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)


top shows 11400 in wait state, 11406-11408 in pause state and 11405 in 
sbwait state.


Any hint is appreciated.



 bye  Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dump locks again

2008-08-08 Thread Kris Kennaway

Andrea Venturoli wrote:

Hello.
I googled around for this but found only very old threads (from 2005 or 
so).


I'm taking dumps of a new box I build, which runs 7.0/amd64 on 8 cores 
with harware RAID-5 (ciss driver).


This is an example of the command I issue:

dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr

Almost always, the dump process will work up to Pass IV (regular files), 
but then stuck there.


# ps ax|grep dump
11400  p1  I+ 0:00.97 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11405  p1  I+ 0:00.18 dump: /dev/da0s1e: pass 4: 4.28% done, 
finished in 0:03 at Fri Aug  8 10:35:34 2008 (dump)
11406  p1  I+ 0:00.24 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11407  p1  I+ 0:00.24 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)
11408  p1  I+ 0:00.23 /sbin/dump -0 -a -f usr.dump -L -h 0 -u /usr 
(dump)


top shows 11400 in wait state, 11406-11408 in pause state and 11405 in 
sbwait state.


Any hint is appreciated.


This was fixed in 7.0-STABLE.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dump locks again

2008-08-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Kris Kennaway ha scritto:

This was fixed in 7.0-STABLE.

Kris


Thanks Kris.
Since this is a critical production box, I'm a bit scared to track Stable.
Do you know when this will be merged into a release (7.1 I suppose)?
Would it be safer to just get this single patch (if possible at all)?

I've also been advised (off list), to switch from the default 4BSD 
scheduler to ULE. What are the implications of this?

Would it solve this specific problem or would I still need to patch/upgrade?

 bye  Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dump locks again

2008-08-08 Thread Kris Kennaway

Andrea Venturoli wrote:

Kris Kennaway ha scritto:

This was fixed in 7.0-STABLE.

Kris


Thanks Kris.
Since this is a critical production box, I'm a bit scared to track Stable.
Do you know when this will be merged into a release (7.1 I suppose)?


I don't know if it is planned to merge the fix as a 7.0 erratum.  You 
could ask re@ about their plans if you like.



Would it be safer to just get this single patch (if possible at all)?


Perhaps but I don't have a patch handy.

I've also been advised (off list), to switch from the default 4BSD 
scheduler to ULE. What are the implications of this?


Better performance, most likely.

Would it solve this specific problem or would I still need to 
patch/upgrade?


No, it won't solve it.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]