On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, O. Hartmann wrote:
FF is in my case 24, too:
pkg info firefox
firefox-24.0,1
Have you done updating the ports regarding
20130929
in /usr/ports/UPDATING? I did on all boxes and on all boxes I did the
tab-stickyness is present.
Firefox 24 allows tab moves for me on both
th drag and drop.
> >
> > HIH
> >
> > matthias
> >
>
> Sorry,
>
> FF is in my case 24, too:
>
> pkg info firefox
> firefox-24.0,1
root@aurora:~ # pkg_info | fgrep firefox
firefox-24.0,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozill
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:50:48 +0200
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann
> escribió:
>
> >
> > After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> > rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are sta
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
>
> After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
> know whether this has to do with the "great pixman
After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
know whether this has to do with the "great pixman update", because
coincidentally I made bot the pixman update and the update of firefox
towards r
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 05:08:09 +0200
Bernt Hansson articulated:
> On 2013-10-06 21:31, Jerry wrote:
> > $ /usr/local/bin/firefox
> >
> > (process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion
> > `sys_page_size == 0' failed
> >
> > This is
On 2013-10-06 21:31, Jerry wrote:
$ /usr/local/bin/firefox
(process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size
== 0' failed
This is all I could gather.
I get the same for firefox and thunderbird
% firefox &
[1] 37788
%
(process:37788): GLib
o.7@
-> libssl.so.0.9.8g
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 198456 Sep 14 2010 /compat/linux/lib/libssl3.so*
$ /usr/local/bin/firefox
(process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size
== 0' failed
This is all I could gather.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list
El día Sunday, October 06, 2013 a las 01:59:08PM -0400, Jerry escribió:
> > In my records about firefox && flashplugin I have about the no sound
> > problem:
> >
> > no sound problem:
> > see also
> > http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 16:40:16 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
> El día Sunday, October 06, 2013 a las 10:27:48AM -0400, Jerry
> escribió:
>
> > Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
> > instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist
El día Sunday, October 06, 2013 a las 10:27:48AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
> Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
> instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
> it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
&g
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 15:33:38 +0100
Dave Morgan articulated:
> On 06/10/13 at 10:27am, Jerry wrote:
> > Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
> > instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and
> > play it with MPlayer, there i
On 06/10/13 at 10:27am, Jerry wrote:
> Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
> instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
> it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
> other day, but I don't know i
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
other day, but I don't know it that would have any effect on it. Also,
on several sit
On 10/02/13 14:49, Gary Kline wrote:
> well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
> other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of
> getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling
> both browsers?
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 27 years of service to the Unix community.
guys,
well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of
Hey Gary,
Try launching FireFox in a terminal emulator, do you get an error
message related to cubeb_refill_stream? To fix the error
try either setting media.use_cubeb -> false in about:config
or rebuild audio/alsa-plugins with ARIFF_OSS disabled.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:25:41AM -0600, G
I think I should know this but I don't, and a search didn't turn up anything
recent.
It's my understanding firefox 22 with html5 should allow playing youtube videos
without the flash plugin. But when I try to watch a youtube video, firefox
crashes. I had this working on firefox 1
just did a ports update, haven't done one for a few months.
portmaster -w www/firefox
craps out with:
In file included from
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/gfx/2d/Blur.cp
p:7:
In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Blur.h:12:
../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.
t;YES"
#rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
#rpc_statd_enable="YES"
nfs_client_enable="YES"
nfs_client_flags="-n 4"
Firefox starts but no bookmarks, history,
With rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
Firefox dosn't come up after 5 minutes
With nolockd mounto
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 07:53:13 +0200
Leslie Jensen articulated:
>
>
> 2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
> > Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
> >
> > http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
> >
> > nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor
2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
On 2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry wrote:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:46:43 +0400
Boris Samorodov articulated:
> This works for me: Edit -> Prefernces -> Applications -> PDF:
> preview in Firefox. As well as other viewer (mupdf tested).
> My current Firefox version is 22.0 though. But I recall it
> working at previous
28.06.2013 21:07, Jerry пишет:
> Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
>
> http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
>
> nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
> that Firefox did anything at all.
>
> Now, entering the same URL u
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
Windows machine, it works perfectly
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
>
> ssh -X -l user xxx host
>
> Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
>
On a clean machine, setting WITHOUT_X11=yes in /
On 18 June 2013 14:01, Teske, Devin wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
>
> > Hi all :-)
> >
> > I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
> >
> > ssh -X -l user xxx host
> >
> > Is there a way to install firefox wi
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
>
> ssh -X -l user xxx host
>
> Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
>
I indeed run Firefox using the above method from
Hi all :-)
I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
ssh -X -l user xxx host
Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
thanks!
Pol
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
> stop. Which do you use?
Opera. No, really. :-)
> I tend to use chromium although I still will
> probably go back to firefox unless chrome b
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:01:39 -0300
Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
> "Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently
> > slow or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow
> or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still
> will probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still will
probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more firefox like.
thanks
ed
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Mikhail Krutov wrote:
> On
tualy cause of which I use Firefox only when I'm forced to do so (on win32),
and on sanier platforms I have better choices.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send a
On 4/29/2013 5:06 AM, Mikhail Krutov wrote:
~ 5 seconds on kinda sligthly better machine;
~ 0.1 seconds if I move ~/.mozilla to tmpfs (which is a kludge and which
sucks)
What if you make it a gmirror with a ramdisk, with the mirror syncing on
boot and preferring the ramdisk? It's still a hack
2013 amd64
Hardware:
AMD Phenom, 4 cores @ 3 Ghz, 8mbytes RAM
With the load (as reported by top) at around 6, Firefox 20 also
takes ~12 seconds.
On the other hand ... once I open a browser I work within it,
until it's no longer needed (or it cr
rdware:
AMD Phenom, 4 cores @ 3 Ghz, 8mbytes RAM
With the load (as reported by top) at around 6, Firefox 20 also
takes ~12 seconds.
On the other hand ... once I open a browser I work within it,
until it's no longer needed (or it crashes :-( ). Opening a new
window/tab in SeaM
2013/4/29 Roland Smith :
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
>> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
>> it take to
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
> it take to start.
>
> On my machine : intel i3 540,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
> it take to start.
The ugly fact is that every browser
Hi,
I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
it take to start.
On my machine : intel i3 540, 2G of RAM and FreeBSD 9.1 it takes
around 12 secondes to start. Is it so long for you too?
What ki
eneral form:
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox/.default
>
>Hey Ronald, are you sure there is no corruption on the disk?
I have no reason whatsoever to suspect that there is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:13 +, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> Is there a file .mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini? If so it should list
> which profile to use. Just change it to the one you want and it
> should
> just work.
>
> I'm using an older version so don't know how
On 12/02/2013 21:38, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In general, I don't upgrade my ports very often, so up until recently
I was running a fairly old version of firefox (firefox-15.0.1,1).
But over the weekend, I moved everything over to a new drive
containing the latest 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 11:39 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is
> picture-flash based and I cannot see ~80% of its content :-)
And the biggest evil is, that those web pages hide important things and
they don't add a site map.
I can't find the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>> A blind Linux user's homepage: http://juliencoder.de/
>> The homepage of my provider: http://www.o2online.de/
>> What site is more pleasant ;)?
> The first one.
Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is
picture-flash
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade causes loss of all firefox settings (?)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:52:34 +0100
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The best websites are made by people using brai
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:16 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> Even though I don't like "Flash" especially because it
> has become what animated GIFs have been used for in the
> past - replacement for HTML, nagging, stealing focus,
> aggressive advertising with sound and so on - it perfectly
> works with O
l is closer to my workflow than the
> design of Chromium.
That's my "problem" with Chromium and Firefox too. I like
the possibility to remove visual controls (red "X" button
on tabs for example) without losing functionality (middle
click on tab closes tab). From my very indivi
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:26 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
> > to other browsers.
>
> Give a try to Chromium :-) I have been using Opera for lo
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
> to other browsers.
Give a try to Chromium :-) I have been using Opera for long time
because it was fast and small. Not that long ago I have switched to
Chromi
is a silent corruption on the filesystem and some
> settings are lost/changed...
Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
to other browsers. 1. It's slow and bloated, even without add-ons,
fortunately it doesn't matter on my relatively modern machine. 2. I
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
> > I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Looking into this issue a bit deeper, I've now learned that all of
> one's personal settings are stored in a directory having a name which
> has the following general form:
> ~/.mozilla/firefox/??
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
> I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
> Arch Linux I used two profiles, one shared with another Linux a
The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
Arch Linux I used two profiles, one shared with another Linux and after
a while I couldn't use the shared profiles anymore, bu
In general, I don't upgrade my ports very often, so up until recently
I was running a fairly old version of firefox (firefox-15.0.1,1).
But over the weekend, I moved everything over to a new drive
containing the latest 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD, and with a complete set
of freshly rebuilt
On 01/31/2013 10:50 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
2013/01/31 21:42:50 + Walter Hurry => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH> > WH> What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the
WH> > port?
WH> > WH>
WH> > WH> It takes abo
Peter Vereshagin writes:
> Hello.
>
> 2013/01/31 18:44:30 + Walter Hurry => To
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
>
> WH> What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the port?
> WH>
> WH> It takes about an hour to compile on my mai
Hello.
2013/01/31 21:42:50 + Walter Hurry => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH> > WH> What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the
WH> > port?
WH> > WH>
WH> > WH> It takes about an hour to compile on my main box (9.1 Rele
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:33:52 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2013/01/31 18:44:30 + Walter Hurry => To
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
>
> WH> What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the
> port?
> WH>
> WH> It ta
Hello.
2013/01/31 18:44:30 + Walter Hurry => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH> What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the port?
WH>
WH> It takes about an hour to compile on my main box (9.1 Release on-
WH> x86_64), which has nothing special a
s' head) and no
> any chromium.
>
> Does it mean that if I need the binary-updated firefox and chromium then
> I need to use pc-bsd?
>
> This makes me want even more to install a pc-bsd or the like into the
> jail and rolling binary updates there without its GUI. Is there
the least, needn't to mention the
OOo is a must, too.
Looking at
http://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/www/
I can't find them. FF is v16 there (v18+ is in the ports' head) and no any
chromium.
Does it mean that if I need the binary-updated firefox and ch
is a must, too.
Looking at
http://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/www/
I can't find them. FF is v16 there (v18+ is in the ports' head) and no any
chromium.
Does it mean that if I need the binary-updated firefox and chromium then I
need to use pc-bsd?
This m
gt; federal courts web site. These are not free. They cost ten cents
> per page. I tried to download a 29 page document and it downloaded
> into firefox just fine and then was displayed in a new firefox tab
> which was apparently using acroread8 to display the document.
>
>
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Warren Block
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:10:16 -0700 (MST)
> Message-id:
Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> > So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
>
>So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
>evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
>buggy *&^%$#@ acroread ?
In Firefox, Edit->Preferences, click the Applications tab, look for
application/pdf and make the obvious
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:10:16 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> > So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
> > evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
> >
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *&^%$#@ acroread ?
Remove acroread entirely. Install graphics/xpdf. Click on a PDF
12.12.2012 12:16, Ronald F. Guilmette пишет:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *&^%$#@ acroread ?
Or do I have to fire up my Windows machine, just to print out a lousey
a 29 page document and it downloaded
into firefox just fine and then was displayed in a new firefox tab
which was apparently using acroread8 to display the document.
I know from past experience that acroreadN runs like crap on FreeBSD...
often using up enormous amounts of CPU % for no apparently
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:52:51 +0100,
Leslie Jensen a écrit :
> Quite some time ago there was a solution posted where you had to go
> to addons and install from a file. The language file is downloaded
> to distfiles/xpi. So you just point to the file and choose to
> install it.
Yes this is the w
HTH
/Leslie
Patrick Lamaiziere skrev:Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09
+0400,
Boris Samorodov a écrit :
Hi,
> > For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
> > be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
> >
> > I use directly the fr.xpi (c
07.11.2012 14:27, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
> Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
> Boris Samorodov a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
>>> For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
>>> be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
>>>
&
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
Boris Samorodov a écrit :
Hi,
> > For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
> > be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
> >
> > I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
>
06.11.2012 23:34, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
> Hello,
>
> For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to be
> in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
>
> I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
> extract), then I add the .
Hello,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to be
in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
extract), then I add the .xpi via the firefox addons menu. That worked
like a charm before. The "fr
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:52:27 -0400, Dieter BSD wrote:
> I would have never guessed to type "about:config" as a URL.
> Very useful to know. Thank you.
Allow me a sidenote: This also works in Opera and provides
access to configuration and functionality that has no usable
GUI equivalent.
--
Poly
>> I have a problem with various parts of web pages stopping
>> before getting completely downloaded. Links has a useful retries
>> setting (setup->network options->retries) which seems to fix
>> this. I need a similar fix for firefox 3.6.2
> Firefox 15
&g
hich seems to fix
> this. I need a similar fix for firefox 3.6.2
Firefox 15
URL: about:config
search: retry
network.http.connection-retry-timeout;250
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
[ no response on mozilla@ list, trying questions@ ]
I have a problem with various parts of web pages stopping
before getting completely downloaded. Links has a useful retries
setting (setup->network options->retries) which seems to fix
this. I need a similar fix for firefox
After a upgrading to 15, and subsequently firefox-15.0.1,1 this morning,
all menus (menu bar, right click context menu, etc) have a fully
transparent background rendering it nearly useless. I've tried starting
with a new profile and that doesn't fix it as well as with qt4/gtk2 to
ink to libvpx.so and compilation/installation went on without a glitch.
I tested it with all firefox port versions under www/ and they all went ok.
Thanks to all that took the time to help.
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoe
Mario Lobo writes:
> 2012/9/4 Warren Block
>
>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" wi
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> "Selectively updating ports is not supported". Then I must wonder why do
> we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a
> mandatory ports-all.
The reason is that you can safely ignore port categories for
languages a
2012/9/4 Warren Block
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
>>> Then cd /usr/ports/www/f
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=nocona
OVE
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>
> First, thanks for replying !
>
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Mario Lobo writes:
> >
> > > env:
> > > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> > > Firefox
First, thanks for replying !
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Mario Lobo writes:
>
> > env:
> > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> > Firefox 15 port
> >
> > The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
> >
> > The first prob
Mario Lobo writes:
> env:
> FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> Firefox 15 port
>
> The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
>
> The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and
> configure stops.
> After examining Config.Log, I found a compil
On 09/04/2012 10:29 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Thank Alexander but been there, done that.
pkg_info | grep pkg
pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib
Hopefully, somebody else on the list will be of more help than I have been.
__
2012/9/4 Alexander Kapshuk
>
> This might help...
>
> /usr/ports/UPDATING
>
> 20120726:
> AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config
> AUTHOR: b...@freebsd.org
>
> devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf
>
> # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config
> or
> # portupgrade -fo
On 09/04/2012 08:11 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
/bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true
mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or
directory
/bin
Hi;
env:
FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
Firefox 15 port
The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and
configure stops.
After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this:
-L/usr/local/lib/nss
I made a symlink
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Aug 29 16:52:53 2012
> Is it possible to reduce priority
> of port building processes with
> something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)?
Sure, I do it all the time.
ok, thanks.
I'll try it next time.
Anton
__
On 29/08/2012 15:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Is it possible to reduce priority
> of port building processes with
> something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)?
Sure, I do it all the time.
You may even want to make a shell alias in your cshrc, i.e.
alias make nice +19 make
(or something like
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:07 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Is it possible to reduce priority
> of port building processes with
> something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)?
>
> Here's a typical scenario for a large build
> (actually buildin
Is it possible to reduce priority
of port building processes with
something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)?
Here's a typical scenario for a large build
(actually building gcc-4.7 and firefox in parallel):
last pid: 54736; load averages: 5.27, 5.38, 5.11
1 - 100 of 1991 matches
Mail list logo
