Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:13:02PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Why perl 5.8? My 5.2 machine is running postfix, perl 5.6.1 and amavisd-new without any trouble at all. perl-5.8.2 is the official stable and recommended version of perl by the perl developers. Actually, I tell a lie --

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-24 Thread Charles Swiger
On Jan 23, 2004, at 8:13 PM, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Why perl 5.8? My 5.2 machine is running postfix, perl 5.6.1 and amavisd-new without any trouble at all. I don't believe that there is anything wrong with perl-5.6.x. For that matter, I don't feel religious opposition to using the stock

freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Michael Whitley
I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success with installing it on a 4.8 system? Michael

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Charles Swiger
On Jan 23, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Michael Whitley wrote: I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:07 PM 1.23.2004 -0600, Michael Whitley wrote: I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Michael Whitley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 02:04 PM 1.23.2004 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: On Jan 23, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Michael Whitley wrote: I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out

Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port

2004-01-23 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Charles Swiger wrote: FreeBSD 4.8 should be recent enough that you can use a modern ports tree without the CONFLICTS feature causing problems, so use CVSUP to update your ports tree to the current version. From there, install /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8, and then run use.perl port. That should