Re: longest uptime
Stevan Tiefert wrote: if I want to do a uptime-record I have always the possiblity to shut down daemons (when needed) and start them again, without rebooting the system! That is very nice! I had many days and weeks running my nicely freebsd-server. BUT every time I updated the patchlevel (in example 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14) I had to reboot my system. But then the counter of uptime is starting at zero again :-( Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! If the patches are applied to a loadable kernel module only, then it should (at least in theory) be enough to rebuild/install the kernel as usual and then just reload the kernel module instead of rebooting. Reloading the module requires that the given service is not in use, which is why it may be easier to just reboot. Taking this idea to the extreme, there is a number of other projects, non-FBSD, that work on micro/nanokernel technology. I can't recommend you one over another - I haven't tried them - QNX is a commercial product, also there is open-source LSE/OS, just to get you started. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
Hi all, On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:26 +0200, Nico Meijer wrote: Hi Stevan, Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! Short answer: no. Long answer: don't think like that. Uptime is not important. It is not a pissing contest. Bye... Nico ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is every very cool is that the top 25 longest uptime on netcraft are of BSD origin and that thirteen of which are FreeBSD. With proper power conditioning I get around 2 years of uptime before rebooting a firewall. Usually the only reason I reboot is to completely roll to the a later production release. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: longest uptime
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Morland Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 5:20 AM To: Stevan Tiefert Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: longest uptime On 4/28/05, Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! For educational purposes only: http://www.jwsdot.com/tuptune/ -CM For educational purposes only, too: Have a look at kernel/bsd/code/introduction/chguptime.tgz in this package http://packetstorm.linuxsecurity.com/filedesc/kernel-3.tbz.html zheyu -- +++ Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:49:33AM +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Joshua Tinnin writes: An long-unpatched FreeBSD install on a DMZ server makes me a bit more edgy than knowing the uptime will reset to zero when it's rebooted after updating. Is FreeBSD so insecure that it must be patched every few days? No. Are FreeBSD security issues released more than once a year? Yes. I hardly ever see FreeBSD security issues on Bugtraq, and the ones I see often have nothing to do with Net attacks. A properly configured FreeBSD server with no local logins should be quite secure. Do some FreeBSD security issues require local logins for exploit? Yes. Do all of them? No. Are some of them remotely attackable? Yes. Does it depend what services you're running? Often. Are there some remotely attackable security issues which don't depend on specific services you're running, or involve always-running services? Sometimes. Can you get away without patching and rebooting FreeBSD for every security update? Usually for long periods of time, depending on what you're running. Is it a good idea to patch anyway? Yes. -- Clifton -- Clifton Royston -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tiki Technologies Lead Programmer/Software Architect I'm gonna tell my son to grow up pretty as the grass is green And whip-smart as the English Channel's wide... -- 'Whip-Smart', Liz Phair ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
longest uptime
Hello list, if I want to do a uptime-record I have always the possiblity to shut down daemons (when needed) and start them again, without rebooting the system! That is very nice! I had many days and weeks running my nicely freebsd-server. BUT every time I updated the patchlevel (in example 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14) I had to reboot my system. But then the counter of uptime is starting at zero again :-( Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! With regards Stevan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
Hi Stevan, Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! Short answer: no. Long answer: don't think like that. Uptime is not important. It is not a pissing contest. Bye... Nico ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
On 4/28/05, Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! For educational purposes only: http://www.jwsdot.com/tuptune/ -CM ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
On Thu 28 Apr 05 12:37, Stevan Tiefert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list, if I want to do a uptime-record I have always the possiblity to shut down daemons (when needed) and start them again, without rebooting the system! That is very nice! I had many days and weeks running my nicely freebsd-server. BUT every time I updated the patchlevel (in example 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14) I had to reboot my system. But then the counter of uptime is starting at zero again :-( Question: Is there a possiblity to run the system inclusive patching it, without rebooting? Goal is to run a system maybe longer than a year!!! As others have said, no, and it's not really important, though FWIW, my uptime is always as long as my machines run without me rebooting them, meaning they'll stay up until I say otherwise ;) They never go down on their own. I have a laptop running close to a month now, and the only reason it's not longer is because I wanted to update to 5.4-PR. But ... rebooting in order to update for security fixes is not a bad thing. An long-unpatched FreeBSD install on a DMZ server makes me a bit more edgy than knowing the uptime will reset to zero when it's rebooted after updating. - jt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
Joshua Tinnin writes: An long-unpatched FreeBSD install on a DMZ server makes me a bit more edgy than knowing the uptime will reset to zero when it's rebooted after updating. Is FreeBSD so insecure that it must be patched every few days? I hardly ever see FreeBSD security issues on Bugtraq, and the ones I see often have nothing to do with Net attacks. A properly configured FreeBSD server with no local logins should be quite secure. The only problem I've ever had resulted from a bug in Apache, and Apache obviously isn't part of FreeBSD. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: longest uptime
On Thu 28 Apr 05 19:49, Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Tinnin writes: An long-unpatched FreeBSD install on a DMZ server makes me a bit more edgy than knowing the uptime will reset to zero when it's rebooted after updating. Is FreeBSD so insecure that it must be patched every few days? Obviously not. Security update notifications are available: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security-notifications I hardly ever see FreeBSD security issues on Bugtraq, and the ones I see often have nothing to do with Net attacks. A properly configured FreeBSD server with no local logins should be quite secure. The only problem I've ever had resulted from a bug in Apache, and Apache obviously isn't part of FreeBSD. It depends very much on what you're doing with it and what the vulnerabilities are. Security is always a balance between practicality and safety. FreeBSD is very secure by design, but ignoring security updates isn't necessarily the best idea. If I were running 3.x, it would probably make me a bit nervous if I couldn't update it to at least 4.11, though some people still do run 3.x - wouldn't necessarily recommend it, though. - jt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:49:22PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Doesn't (or didn't?) Linux have a 'feature' that allowed ppl to save their uptimes through a reboot? So, for instance, if it was a schedualed reboot, uptime still showed one continuous uptime? I'd imagine that this would be saved through upgrades as well ... There's a similar module for fbsd here: http://garage.freebsd.pl although the site appears to be down at this moment. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - Another FreeBSD Diary http://ipfwstats.sf.net/- ipfw peruser traffic logging ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:18:18PM +, Jez Hancock wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:49:22PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Doesn't (or didn't?) Linux have a 'feature' that allowed ppl to save their uptimes through a reboot? So, for instance, if it was a schedualed reboot, uptime still showed one continuous uptime? I'd imagine that this would be saved through upgrades as well ... There's a similar module for fbsd here: http://garage.freebsd.pl although the site appears to be down at this moment. The irony is delicious ;-) -T -- Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defense against complexity. -- David Gelernter, Machine Beauty: Elegance and the Heart of Technology ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:28:40PM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:18:18PM +, Jez Hancock wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:49:22PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Doesn't (or didn't?) Linux have a 'feature' that allowed ppl to save their uptimes through a reboot? So, for instance, if it was a schedualed reboot, uptime still showed one continuous uptime? I'd imagine that this would be saved through upgrades as well ... There's a similar module for fbsd here: http://garage.freebsd.pl although the site appears to be down at this moment. The irony is delicious ;-) LOL :P Actually that site had a module for modifying your uptime I think it was rather than saving your old uptime. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - Another FreeBSD Diary http://ipfwstats.sf.net/- ipfw peruser traffic logging ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
Hi, On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Daniela wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2004 20:47, Jamie wrote: I'm curious as to what the longest uptimes are people have seen on production servers. We've got a FreeBSD machine here with an uptime of 506 days. It is a file server and it also runs spamassassin for another machine. Too bad we have to take it down to replace a motherboard tonight with leaky caps. It would have been fun to see if it could have made it to 999 or higher. I'm curious as to what the highest uptimes people have seen on their servers. With times like that, you can't help but fall in love with FreeBSD!! I have heard of a machine running FreeBSD 2.2 with 2300+ days uptime and still running. Mine has only reached 29 days so far, because I patch my system very often. I just checked back and it's still up ... --snipp-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: {8} uname -a FreeBSD hostname.domain 2.2.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 9 18:53:29 CET 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/XX i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: {9} uptime 9:44PM up 2204 days, 2:38, 1 user, load averages: 0.48, 0.24, 0.10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: {10} date Sun Feb 22 21:45:29 CET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: {11} --snipp-- hostnames and domains changed to protect the innocent. Of course this does not make much sense and the customer in question would be well advised with an update. Have been talking to them. Our own production servers regularly reach 200 days and more. We update things like ssh and openssl in place and only do full buildworld/installworld upgrades perhaps once or twice a year. Lot's can be done while staying up. Jails help a lot of course. Not having external users with shell access also helps. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] CK Software GmbHhttp://www.cksoft.de/ Phone: +49 7452 889 135 Fax: +49 7452 889 136 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Longest uptime
I'm curious as to what the longest uptimes are people have seen on production servers. We've got a FreeBSD machine here with an uptime of 506 days. It is a file server and it also runs spamassassin for another machine. Too bad we have to take it down to replace a motherboard tonight with leaky caps. It would have been fun to see if it could have made it to 999 or higher. I'm curious as to what the highest uptimes people have seen on their servers. With times like that, you can't help but fall in love with FreeBSD!! - Jamie Greetings from Minneapolis, MN, United States A friend is someone who lets you have total freedom to be yourself. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Saturday, 21 February 2004 at 15:24:47 -0500, S wrote: I'm curious as to what the longest uptimes are people have seen on production servers. http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html I've known people with server uptimes of over 1000 days. It's rather pointless to go beyond this time, since it means you're running seriously out-of-date software. I suspect that the predominance of BSD/OS in the top positions is due to the fact that it costs money, whereas FreeBSD users are more likely to update. Note that the current top of the list has been running for 1741 days, which means that it was booted in May 1999. A lot has happened in that time. What I find more interesting is a thing that people can relate to more directly: how long has you *desktop* been up? Here's my current best: $ uptime 8:38AM up 528 days, 9:04, 10 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.02, 0.00 $ ps aux | grep X root 987 0.0 15.5 73436 24600 ?? S12Sep02 2718:33.85 X :0 -bpp 16 (XFree86) I wouldn't do this on a machine that wasn't almost completely firewalled. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 02:47:56PM -0600, Jamie wrote: I'm curious as to what the longest uptimes are people have seen on production servers. We've got a FreeBSD machine here with an uptime of 506 days. It is a file server and it also runs spamassassin for another machine. Too bad we have to take it down to replace a motherboard tonight with leaky caps. It would have been fun to see if it could have made it to 999 or higher. I'm curious as to what the highest uptimes people have seen on their servers. With times like that, you can't help but fall in love with FreeBSD!! Dear Jamie, I don't feel having high uptimes is sucha good this. Both for security reason and big software fixes. Therefor mine usaly stay below 45 days. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
On Saturday 21 February 2004 20:47, Jamie wrote: I'm curious as to what the longest uptimes are people have seen on production servers. We've got a FreeBSD machine here with an uptime of 506 days. It is a file server and it also runs spamassassin for another machine. Too bad we have to take it down to replace a motherboard tonight with leaky caps. It would have been fun to see if it could have made it to 999 or higher. I'm curious as to what the highest uptimes people have seen on their servers. With times like that, you can't help but fall in love with FreeBSD!! I have heard of a machine running FreeBSD 2.2 with 2300+ days uptime and still running. Mine has only reached 29 days so far, because I patch my system very often. Daniela ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
I cannot verify that any system has been up for 2300+ days but according to Netcraft.com (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html) there are some very impressive uptimes out there. Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Longest uptime
Doesn't (or didn't?) Linux have a 'feature' that allowed ppl to save their uptimes through a reboot? So, for instance, if it was a schedualed reboot, uptime still showed one continuous uptime? I'd imagine that this would be saved through upgrades as well ... Not sure of the accuracy of this, but I seem to recall some friends running Linux mentioning this ... On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Pratt, Benjamin E. wrote: I cannot verify that any system has been up for 2300+ days but according to Netcraft.com (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html) there are some very impressive uptimes out there. Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O T Longest uptime ever recorded ?
Hello there Can anyone tell me is there any sort of record in the histroy of servers wat is the longest uptime of the server ever recorded ? thanks = *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: O T Longest uptime ever recorded ?
-Original Message- From: faisal gillani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 13:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O T Longest uptime ever recorded ? Hello there Can anyone tell me is there any sort of record in the histroy of servers wat is the longest uptime of the server ever recorded ? http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: O T Longest uptime ever recorded ?
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:15:15AM -0800, faisal gillani wrote: Can anyone tell me is there any sort of record in the histroy of servers wat is the longest uptime of the server ever recorded ? Oh dear, not this topic again. Google is your friend. You'll find that bragging about how long one's server has been up for is a perennial favourite on the web and around newsgroups. One link that is a favourite amongst BSD'ers is: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html The counter argument to all this my uptime is bigger than yours tomfoolery is that any well managed server will be regularly upgraded, run through power-on tests and so forth --- at least once a year --- so uptimes stretching back to the pre-cambrian indicate a lack of proper maintenance. Whatever. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message