Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-14 Thread E.S.
I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since the source in it is newer? I just don't want to get stuck running my daily desktop OS (FreeBSD) only to have a kernel panic or have XF86 lockup on me when I'm busy doing a programming assignment or an essay or

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-14 Thread Adam Weinberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since the source in it is newer? end of Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!?? from E.S. - -RELEASE is just

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-14 Thread Kent Stewart
E.S. wrote: I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since the source in it is newer? There are two views. Stable has new code but it also has bug fixes that never make it to one of the _x varieties. I go for the bug fixes. I just don't want to get stuck

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-14 Thread Jerry McAllister
(11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since the source in it is newer? - -RELEASE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a specific point in time. In general, -STABLE is supposed to remain stable enough to be a

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!?? -- SUCCESS

2002-11-14 Thread E.S.
: (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since the source in it is newer? end of Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!?? from E.S. -RELEASE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a specific point

make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-13 Thread E.S.
I figured out my make buildworld problem I mentioned earlier (I'd uncommented NO_OPENSSL=true in my make.conf - big mistake!), and now that world builds OK, I'm having kernel build problems. I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the output for make buildkernel

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-13 Thread Kent Stewart
E.S. wrote: I figured out my make buildworld problem I mentioned earlier (I'd uncommented NO_OPENSSL=true in my make.conf - big mistake!), and now that world builds OK, I'm having kernel build problems. I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the output for make

Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??

2002-11-13 Thread E.S.
Well, 4.7-RELEASE was released before Nov. 1, 2002 (on Oct. 10). As I understand it, 4.7-RELEASE is can be obtained by cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7 (and generally the only patches that are applied to -RELEASE are security patches)... whereas if I cvsup'd to RELENG_4, *then* I would be getting