On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Man, I love the ports system!!
__
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
> Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
> packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Robert Huff
_
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Adam J Richardson wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one etc.
It is perfectly safe to have all of them i
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 15:13 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
>
> autoconf-2.13.000227_5 < needs updating (port has
> 2.13.000227_6)
> autoconf-2.53_3 < needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
> auto
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
>
>
> Longer answer:
>
> The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
> them, and others need another one etc.
> It is perfectly safe to have all of them instal
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
>
>> today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
>>
>> autoconf-2.13.000227_5 < needs updating (port has
>> 2.13.000227_6)
>> autoconf-2.53_3 <
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
>
> autoconf-2.13.000227_5 < needs updating (port has
> 2.13.000227_6)
> autoconf-2.53_3 < needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 < needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3 < needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
autoconf-2.59_2 < needs updating (port has 2.59_3)
