Re: ports-collection borked?
[Kent Stewart, 2004-07-21] Sometimes mirrors break. The only way to find out is to try a different one. The port fastest_cvsup is a good starting point. Just remember that the closest may not produce the overall fastest cvsup. Not that I've tested this in any scientific manner, but I think the closest one is also the fastest in my case, as it is on the same /16-network that I'm on. In fact it's only about a km away, and it's 2Gbps all the way from my dorm room to the mirror, so I think my 10/100 nic is the limiting factor here. It could be out of sync or something, though. Whatever it was, it seems to be in order now (it may still be somewhat behind the master cvs-server, but the fixed index has at least found its way to the mirror now. And from there to my box.) sve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ports-collection borked?
When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? SVein HAlvor ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 11:57 am, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? Your make.conf and installed ports can affect the INDEX build. The USE_ or WITH_ adds features. My make.conf files don't have anything of that nature. FWIW, I grabbed the cvsup16 1900 UTC update and had no problems building an INDEX on 4-stable or 5-current. Right now, I use portindex to build INDEX[-5]. The messages like you were seeing were occuring yesterday I tried a make index on 4-stable around 0700 UTC and didn't have any problem with it. KEnt -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:57:25 +0200 (CEST), Svein Halvor Halvorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? I did a cvsup after I read your e-mail just now and it finished updating successfully, so its a problem on your end, unfortunately, I can't help you with the problem since I've never had to encounter one like it before. Sorry, hope I was of more help. -Assad ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 12:47:29PM -0700, 3BSD wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:57:25 +0200 (CEST), Svein Halvor Halvorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? I did a cvsup after I read your e-mail just now and it finished updating successfully, so its a problem on your end, unfortunately, I can't help you with the problem since I've never had to encounter one like it before. Sorry, hope I was of more help. I can confirm the problem cvsup'd this morning and can't portsdb -Uu without getting all those 10 fields lines.. 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3, fwiw dan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On my side, the cvsup server is running without any problem. I think it could be figured out if you use another cvs server. If it still generates the same messages, it may be no longer a server problem. Soo-Hyun - Original Message - From: Dan Rue [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 3BSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:00 PM Subject: Re: ports-collection borked? On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 12:47:29PM -0700, 3BSD wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:57:25 +0200 (CEST), Svein Halvor Halvorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? I did a cvsup after I read your e-mail just now and it finished updating successfully, so its a problem on your end, unfortunately, I can't help you with the problem since I've never had to encounter one like it before. Sorry, hope I was of more help. I can confirm the problem cvsup'd this morning and can't portsdb -Uu without getting all those 10 fields lines.. 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3, fwiw dan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 01:00 pm, Dan Rue wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 12:47:29PM -0700, 3BSD wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:57:25 +0200 (CEST), Svein Halvor Halvorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When rebuilding the index after cvsup-ing the ports collection I get lots and lots of these lines: /usr/ports/INDEX-5:11379:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. This from a 15 min old port collection. The same happened earlier today (which is why I retried just now). Is this a local problem, or is the collection borken. Is there anything I could do locally? I did a cvsup after I read your e-mail just now and it finished updating successfully, so its a problem on your end, unfortunately, I can't help you with the problem since I've never had to encounter one like it before. Sorry, hope I was of more help. I can confirm the problem cvsup'd this morning and can't portsdb -Uu without getting all those 10 fields lines.. 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3, fwiw My mirror updates on the odd hours + 30. It takes a while to build a make index on 5-current and make index worked. I saw the 10 field messages for a short time yesterday but don't remember if it was for the index build or the INDEX.db build. It was in an off hour cron job where I saw them and so they weren't logged. I haven't seen them since but I also switched to using portindex because I can create an INDEX[-5] in less than a minute. The first time portindex is run, it fills a database and it is very fast the next time. Do you have any options in your /etc/make.conf to specify any features? Kris is on vaction and the fetchindex option has been turned off. Something crashed and he didn't have time to fix it. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
[Kent Stewart, 2004-07-21] I saw the 10 field messages for a short time yesterday but don't : Do you have any options in your /etc/make.conf to specify any features? It now seems to work. All I did was to cvsup again. It seems that most people experienced this yesterday. Could it be that I'm fetching the ports collection from a mirror, and that this is causing a time delay in the distribution of the files? Anyway... all's good now :) /sve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports-collection borked?
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 03:53 pm, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: [Kent Stewart, 2004-07-21] I saw the 10 field messages for a short time yesterday but don't Do you have any options in your /etc/make.conf to specify any features? It now seems to work. All I did was to cvsup again. It seems that most people experienced this yesterday. Could it be that I'm fetching the ports collection from a mirror, and that this is causing a time delay in the distribution of the files? Anyway... all's good now :) If you aren't an official mirror you have to cvsup from a mirror. Sometimes mirrors break. The only way to find out is to try a different one. The port fastest_cvsup is a good starting point. Just remember that the closest may not produce the overall fastest cvsup. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
