[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
andrew clarke said (on 2008/10/29):
You need to understand that the FreeBSD project by its nature is
primarily source-code driven. Making packages available (of any port)
is of very low priority in comparison to the rest of the system
(testing, documentation, etc). De
On 2008-Oct-29 10:22:36 -0500, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We also have some sparc64 machines that are on loan to us, which I am
>also in the process of configuration, but these are only UltraSPARC-II
>machines. There seems to be some work going on right now to get us
>running on US-I
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:55:20AM -0700, mdh wrote:
> email the FreeBSD Foundation and find out how much cash it'd take for
> additional hardware to make that a reality, then send them that much cash.
We are actually set up ok on amd64 machines right now (incremental
package builds take just ov
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:02:14PM +0800, joeb wrote:
> How does kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8 or php5-gd or pdflib fit into those
> reasons you gave?
A little research shows:
ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/php5-gd-5.2.6_2.tbz
So, there is a current package for ph
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:42:18AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages
> for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64,
> mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages
> needing to be created at the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> An alternate solution to this problem is to allow users to upload missing
> packages
one word for you: "security".
What you suggest is never, ever, going to be implemented, due to the
total lack of security.
mcl
___
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:10:33 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> andrew clarke said (on 2008/10/29):
> > You need to understand that the FreeBSD project by its nature is
> > primarily source-code driven. Making packages available (of any
> > port) is of very low priority in comparison to the rest o
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ports missing their packages.
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG"
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 4:09 AM
> It's my understandin
On Wed 2008-10-29 04:10:33 UTC-0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I'm not sure I got all the emails in this thread... maybe some just
> haven't arrived yet.
It began on freebsd-ports, then the OP started cross-posting to
-questions, so I moved my replies to -questions.
> Anywa
andrew clarke said (on 2008/10/29):
> You need to understand that the FreeBSD project by its nature is
> primarily source-code driven. Making packages available (of any port)
> is of very low priority in comparison to the rest of the system
> (testing, documentation, etc). Demanding that the Fre
On 10/29/08, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
Port maintainers usually ver
On Wed 2008-10-29 16:53:26 UTC+0800, joeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Well if you have this cluster build process why have some ports never been
> built all the way back to release 5.0 like kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8. That is
> almost 3 years of waiting to get in the cluster build process.
You nee
Trulsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:47 PM
> To: FBSD1
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ports missing their packages.
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> > It's my understanding that a
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \ / Remko Lodder | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/ |
> / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Remko Lodder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: W
On 2008-Oct-29 16:09:23 +0800, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
>real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
>source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
I'm not sure wh
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trulsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:47 PM
To: FBSD1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports missing their packages.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my under
On Wed, October 29, 2008 9:09 am, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
> Creating the package after
ent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports missing their packages.
Well if you have this cluster build process why have some ports never been
built all the way back to release 5.0 like kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
> Creating the package
It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
Creating the package after this is just one command and a ftp upload to the
package
20 matches
Mail list logo
