On 5/5/09, Tim Judd wrote:
> Would you try enabling the IDE channels and see if the IRQ storms stop?
There is joy in Mudville.
I couldn't really change the IDE settings that much since there are no
IDE drives in this thing. The channels are all on 'auto' and that
yields a "NONE" for each of t
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Duane wrote:
> On 5/4/09, Tim Judd wrote:
>
> > IRQ15 is typically your secondary IDE controller; but due to PCI (or
> E-ISA)
> > plug&play, including the PnP the BIOS may setup, lots of others can be on
> > that bus too.
>
> This box has one SCSI card running tw
On 5/4/09, Tim Judd wrote:
> IRQ15 is typically your secondary IDE controller; but due to PCI (or E-ISA)
> plug&play, including the PnP the BIOS may setup, lots of others can be on
> that bus too.
This box has one SCSI card running two SCSI drives. The IDE's are
disabled in the BIOS. But the SCS
is launched. This fact -- unknown to me before last night
> -- was the source of a great deal of lost time!
>
> My 6.4 SMP kernel (now customized) runs just fine, with both cpus
> active, *except* for this message streaming constantly up the boot
> console.
>
> (from /var/log/messages:)
&
-- was the source of a great deal of lost time!
Good you found a work around. You might try ensuring your running
latest avail bios as well.
My 6.4 SMP kernel (now customized) runs just fine, with both cpus
active, *except* for this message streaming constantly up the boot
console.
(from /var/lo
of a great deal of lost time!
My 6.4 SMP kernel (now customized) runs just fine, with both cpus
active, *except* for this message streaming constantly up the boot
console.
(from /var/log/messages:)
May 4 20:20:33 poobah kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq15:";
throttling interrupt
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Diego F. Arias R. wrote:
> Are you running generic or custom kernel?
Generic SMP:
# uname -a
FreeBSD poobah.legomenon.org 6.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE #0: Wed
Nov 26 12:11:16 UTC 2008
r...@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
--
Duane
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Duane wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>
>> top should display a C column with a number that represents which cpu the
>> process is running on. IIRC, ACPI must be enabled for SMP to work, and ACPI
>> didn't work on my MB until 7
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> top should display a C column with a number that represents which cpu the
> process is running on. IIRC, ACPI must be enabled for SMP to work, and ACPI
> didn't work on my MB until 7.0.
Using the ACPI boot option doesn't seem to change t
Duane wrote:
I have a fairly new install of 6.4, done over the 'net, on this old
Micron full tower dual PPro-180. The SMP kernel was automagically
installed:
# uname -a
FreeBSD poobah.legomenon.org 6.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE #0: Wed
Nov 26 12:11:16 UTC 2008
r...@dessler.cse.buffal
I have a fairly new install of 6.4, done over the 'net, on this old
Micron full tower dual PPro-180. The SMP kernel was automagically
installed:
# uname -a
FreeBSD poobah.legomenon.org 6.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE #0: Wed
Nov 26 12:11:16 UTC 2008
r...@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/us
Building 6.3-RELEASE on dual Xeon boxes, SMP kernel builds fine, all
4 CPUs launch on reboot.
options SMP
device apic
But I get a TON of interrupts from acpi0 -- about 68,000 per second
according to vmstat -i. With system at idle with almost no services
ny problems. freebsd-update has also chosen the
right SMP kernel now and installed the new version.
Matthias
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi list,
i've built a SMP Kernel on an amd64 system because the GENERIC kernel on
my amd64 FreeBSD 6.2 box did not include SMP support. After booting with
the new kernel freebsd-update won't work:
# freebsd-update fetch
Cannot identify running kernel
# uname -a
FreeBSD hostname 6.2-
I note that this problem has appeared in the past and am wondering
if there is a resolution:
Running 6.2-STABLE on a machine that ran 4.11 flawlessly. I am seeing the
message "failed to create swap_zone" right after the 2nd CPU gets
enabled on a Dell PowerEdge 1300. The system blows out and reb
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:
You know, it'd be cool if there were a knob in the ports framework that
allowed port maintainers to specify this, something like PARALLEL_MAKE=yes
in the Makefile ...
Or is that a dumb idea for some reason I don't understand?
I personally don't think it
You know, it'd be cool if there were a knob in the ports framework that
allowed port maintainers to specify this, something like PARALLEL_MAKE=yes
in the Makefile ...
Or is that a dumb idea for some reason I don't understand?
I personally don't think it's a dumb idea at all. The problem is the
In response to "Josh Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >I noticed something strange: When I compile using ma in the ports
> > > > tree, I only have 50% load. CPU1 is used at CPU0 is idle...
>
> As was already pointed out, ports do not compile with make -j X by
> default. You can do so f
> >I noticed something strange: When I compile using ma in the ports
> > tree, I only have 50% load. CPU1 is used at CPU0 is idle...
As was already pointed out, ports do not compile with make -j X by
default. You can do so for ports that will build cleanly (not all of
them will), by addi
Hello Bill,
Thanks for your answer
> >I have at my disposal an Inspiron 9400 with an Intel CoreFreeBSD
> 6.2
> > is installed and rebuilt to fit the processor. The kerne l is in SMP
> mode.
> >I noticed something strange: When I compile using ma in the ports
> > tree, I only have
In response to Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:44:42PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to "Daniel Tourde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >Hello,
> > >I have at my disposal an Inspiron 9400 with an Intel CoreFreeBSD
> > > 6.2
> > > is installed
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:44:42PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Daniel Tourde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >Hello,
> >I have at my disposal an Inspiron 9400 with an Intel CoreFreeBSD 6.2
> > is installed and rebuilt to fit the processor. The kerne l is in SMP mode.
> >
In response to "Daniel Tourde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>Hello,
>I have at my disposal an Inspiron 9400 with an Intel CoreFreeBSD 6.2
> is installed and rebuilt to fit the processor. The kerne l is in SMP mode.
>I noticed something strange: When I compile using ma in the ports
>
Hello,
I have at my disposal an Inspiron 9400 with an Intel Core = Duo.
FreeBSD 6.2 is installed and rebuilt to fit the processor. The kerne l is
in SMP mode.
I noticed something strange: When I compile using ma= ke, make install
in the ports tree, I only have 50% load. CPU1 is u
Hello All,
I am stuck on a FreeBSD 6.1 SMP Kernel issue that won't allow me to use my
Cardbus wireless nic. I did a little digging and I found that a driver is
not being loaded for the pci0 bridge device. Is there a way to load a driver
for this device? I think this will resolve my issu
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hello,
Is SMP enabled in the GENERIC kernel? I have a hyperthreading box, and on
Linux it shows up with two cpus. When I do a top on the box in FreeBSD I still
see only one CPU. Also, sysctl -a | grep cpu only shows a dev.cpu.0.
The GENERIC does not support SMP.
If
Michael P. Soulier schrieb:
Hello,
Is SMP enabled in the GENERIC kernel? I have a hyperthreading box, and on
Linux it shows up with two cpus. When I do a top on the box in FreeBSD I still
see only one CPU. Also, sysctl -a | grep cpu only shows a dev.cpu.0.
If you install FreeBSD 6.1 then you
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 19:01, Andy Reitz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is SMP enabled in the GENERIC kernel? I have a hyperthreading box, and on
> > Linux it shows up with two cpus. When I do a top on the box in FreeBSD I
> > still see only one CPU. Als
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is SMP enabled in the GENERIC kernel? I have a hyperthreading box, and on
> Linux it shows up with two cpus. When I do a top on the box in FreeBSD I still
> see only one CPU. Also, sysctl -a | grep cpu only shows a dev.cpu.0.
Hi Mike,
I
Hello,
Is SMP enabled in the GENERIC kernel? I have a hyperthreading box, and on
Linux it shows up with two cpus. When I do a top on the box in FreeBSD I still
see only one CPU. Also, sysctl -a | grep cpu only shows a dev.cpu.0.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent f
] On Behalf Of Tamouh H.
Sent: January 21, 2006 4:18 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: panic on 5.4 SMP kernel when jailed apache is used heavily
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I upgraded a 5.3 system to 5.4 both with SMP kernels, I'm
> running 6 jails on a dual xe
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I upgraded a 5.3 system to 5.4 both with SMP kernels, I'm
> running 6 jails on a dual xeon 1.26 hp rackmount. When apache
> (both 1.3 and 2.0) is being used heavily the system panics.
> With a 5.4 GENERIC kernel or a 5.3 SMP kernel this beh
Hi all,
I upgraded a 5.3 system to 5.4 both with SMP kernels, I'm running 6 jails on
a dual xeon 1.26 hp rackmount. When apache (both 1.3 and 2.0) is being used
heavily the system panics. With a 5.4 GENERIC kernel or a 5.3 SMP kernel
this behaviour does not happen and the system is s
On 7/10/2005 11:55 PM Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
On 7/11/05, Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just built my first 5.4-RELEASE system. I want a SMP kernel. The
GENERIC kernel conf file contains this line:
device apic# I/O apic
According to NOTES
On 7/11/05, Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just built my first 5.4-RELEASE system. I want a SMP kernel. The
> GENERIC kernel conf file contains this line:
>
> device apic# I/O apic
>
> According to NOTES, this is all that&#x
I just built my first 5.4-RELEASE system. I want a SMP kernel. The
GENERIC kernel conf file contains this line:
device apic# I/O apic
According to NOTES, this is all that's required to build an SMP kernel.
However my dmesg does not indicate that both proce
not active and the additional CPUs were not launched.
Thinking that perhaps my custom kernel conf was at fault, I compiled a
GENERIC smp kernel with:
# cd /usr/obj
# chflags -R noschg *
# rm -rf *
/usr/src/# make buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP
/usr/src/# make installkernel KERNCONF=SMP
After reboot
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Kara Chapman wrote:
> Thanks for your help -- that seems to have fixed the problem. You
> mentioned that it was only a temporary fix, so what do you suggest doing
> now? Is this a bug that I should report?
FYI, the error below is probably not causing actual problems, but we
ary 14, 2005 3:10 PM
> To: Kara Chapman
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: SMP kernel
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:08:25PM -1000, Kara Chapman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and have recently rebuilt the
, 2005 3:10 PM
To: Kara Chapman
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SMP kernel
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:08:25PM -1000, Kara Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and have recently rebuilt the kernel to use
> SMP. Ever since, I get these error messag
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:08:25PM -1000, Kara Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and have recently rebuilt the kernel to use
> SMP. Ever since, I get these error messages from postfix on a regular
> basis:
>
>
>
> postfix/smtpd[49491]: fatal: accept connection: Invalid
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and have recently rebuilt the kernel to use
SMP. Ever since, I get these error messages from postfix on a regular
basis:
postfix/smtpd[49491]: fatal: accept connection: Invalid argument
Does anyone know what this means and if it's at all related to the new
ur own kernel by copying
> the /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC file
> to /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MYSYSTEMNAME
>
> Upper case system names are traditionally used for the kernel config
> file in unix. HP-UX is the same, IIRC.
>
> Edit in:
>
>
> # To make an SMP
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:12:57 +, Robert Slade wrote
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Free BSD ( and Linux) and have just setup a rather old
> Proliant 5000 as a test machine. It has Quad PII processors and I would
> like to make use of them. The Install CDs only come with the 'Standard'
> kernel. Looking
HP-UX is the same, IIRC.
Edit in:
# To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed
options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel
device apic# I/O APIC
You will also want to change things like ident to MYSYSTEMNAME. There
are a plethora of other options to
Hi,
I am new to Free BSD ( and Linux) and have just setup a rather old
Proliant 5000 as a test machine. It has Quad PII processors and I would
like to make use of them. The Install CDs only come with the 'Standard'
kernel. Looking through the handbook implies that support for multiple
processors i
.
So, to enable SMP for my custom kernel, do I simply
need to edit SMP to include my custom kernel name?
From my kernel config:
# To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed
options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel
device apic# I/O APIC
Enjoy! =)
Kind
Hello all,
I hope what I have is a simple question.
I have a dual proc machine, that I have loaded 5.3
RELEASE on and then updated it to STABLE. While
reading the Handbook I see where the GENERIC kernel
has SMP built in via the SMP file in
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf directory.
So, to enable SMP f
Dan Rue
>
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:22:51AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Ok, Here's the brief specs
> > dual 2.4 Xeons
> > Adaptec Raid-5 SCSI
> >
>
> Is SMP flaky in 4.9 or something? This is my first SMP build..
No problems here with two SMP systems, but they are both older
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:22:51AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Ok, Here's the brief specs
> dual 2.4 Xeons
> Adaptec Raid-5 SCSI
>
> Everything works fine with a 4.9-p3 generic kernel. However, when I
> enable SMP and rebuild the kernel, boot hangs at this step:
>
> >Waiting 15 seconds
Howdy,
Ok, Here's the brief specs
dual 2.4 Xeons
Adaptec Raid-5 SCSI
Everything works fine with a 4.9-p3 generic kernel. However, when I
enable SMP and rebuild the kernel, boot hangs at this step:
>Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
>(noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered
Upon setting up a machine with HT-CPU (P4 2.6GHz) I wonder if there's
any way to display the actual workload on the virtual CPUs.
First of all, here's what my /var/log/messages says:
Feb 27 15:47:50 beastie kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz (2593.68-MHz
686-class CPU)
Feb 27 15:47:5
On Monday 19 January 2004 18:15, Didier WIROTH wrote:
> In /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES it is written:
> # Be sure to disable 'cpu I386_CPU' for SMP kernels.
>
> Do they mean you have to completely remove the "cpu" option from the custom
> file, at this time I'm using this in my custom kernel:
> c
Hi,
I'm a bit confused.
In /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES it is written:
# Be sure to disable 'cpu I386_CPU' for SMP kernels.
Do they mean you have to completely remove the "cpu" option from the custom
file, at this time I'm using this in my custom kernel:
cpu I686_CPU
options S
I am running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE P#7 with and SMP kernel and the box seems to
hang as soon as it is under load for about 2 minutes. I dont get any log or
panic signal and the debug.log is empty as well. I cvsup my sources but I
cannot build as the machine will halt about 2 minutes into
--
Hello,
anything news concerning my SMP problem with the Fujitsu-Siemens RX300
system?
Would be nice to have SMP running at Friday evening, when I have to go
into production.
Thanks and best regards
Lars
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Lars Köller
[EMAIL PROTECT
--
Hi,
sorry, I've forgotten in my last mail to attache the mp_table output.
Is anything else needed?
===
MPTable, version 2.0.15
--
zu mittlerweile auch die
> Fujitsu-Siemens-Boards - zumindest aus meiner Sicht, denn
> das D1306 macht auch extreme Probleme, sobald es ein
> SMP-Kernel verwendet wird...
> Du könntest mal diesen Patch versuchen:
> http://www.bnv-bamberg.de/home/ba3294/smp/files/notes/n000107.txt
Thi
Hi experts,
I need urgently help or a patch for FreeBSD-4-STABLE on a
Fujitsu-Siemens RX300 hardware:
- The non-SMP kernel runs well
- With the SMP kernel a lockup occur after the 8254 interrupt
delivery is tested:
...
APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery
I&#x
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:37:56PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> >
> > You just need to uncomment/enable these options in the GENERIC kernel
> > configuration like so:
> >
> > #cpuI486_CPU
> > cpu I586_CPU
> > cpu I686_CPU
>
> Is *this* actually correct?
>
> Loo
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:08, Khairil Yusof wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 14:18, shubha mr wrote:
>
> > For a multiprocessor machine,to install FreeBSD,is
> > something extra needs to be done from what will be
> > done to install the OS for a uni processor machine?I
> > mean is there anything diff
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 14:18, shubha mr wrote:
> For a multiprocessor machine,to install FreeBSD,is
> something extra needs to be done from what will be
> done to install the OS for a uni processor machine?I
> mean is there anything different to be installed for a
> symmetric multi processor machin
Sorry after re-reading my reply one thing I did not make clear
Install freebsd as you would with a uniprocessor machine, then boot that
install and do what I recommend below
- Mike
>
> You need to recompile the kernel with the SMP options turned on, install
> the kernel and reboot. On a
You need to recompile the kernel with the SMP options turned on, install
the kernel and reboot. On a reasonable modern machine takes less than 10
minutes.
See /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC and the FreeBSD Handbook.
- Mike
> Hi,
> For a multiprocessor machine,to install FreeBSD,is
> something
Hi,
For a multiprocessor machine,to install FreeBSD,is
something extra needs to be done from what will be
done to install the OS for a uni processor machine?I
mean is there anything different to be installed for a
symmetric multi processor machine?
thanks
shubha
__
Has anyone gotten the FreeBSD SMP kernel to boot on a Compaq DL380 G3? There was a
known problem in the G2s where you had to set the OS option to "Linux" in the Compaq
BIOS for the SMP kernel to boot correctly. However, this does not appear to work on
the G3s.
There are two BI
66 matches
Mail list logo
