On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 03:32:49PM -0600, Shane Kinney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
>
> > These messages may not be a concern
> > since named really *is* running.
> >
> > This looks like a packet-filter issue and
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 09:06:46PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 20:57, Gary D Kline wrote:
> > Hi People,
> >
> > I've switched back to ipf/ipf.rules until I can figure out
> > how to get dhcp working with ipfw. Does anyone have any
> > idea why the follo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
> These messages may not be a concern
> since named really *is* running.
>
> This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
First things first. Turn of named. Then turn off IPF. A
On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 21:06, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 20:57, Gary D Kline wrote:
> > Hi People,
> >
> > I've switched back to ipf/ipf.rules until I can figure out
> > how to get dhcp working with ipfw. Does anyone have any
> > idea why the following messages
On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 20:57, Gary D Kline wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> I've switched back to ipf/ipf.rules until I can figure out
> how to get dhcp working with ipfw. Does anyone have any
> idea why the following messages are being output to
> /var/log/messages? --The
Hi People,
I've switched back to ipf/ipf.rules until I can figure out
how to get dhcp working with ipfw. Does anyone have any
idea why the following messages are being output to
/var/log/messages? --These messages may not be a concern
since nam
