On 01/24/10 19:31, Bernt Hansson wrote:
You need thunderbird3-i18n not thunderbird-i18n.
Yes, of course. Unfortunately there's no change, after deinstalling and
rebuilding it's the same behaviour.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of
the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the
correct
offset to use
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of
the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct
http://www.mini-box.com/D510MO-mini-ITX-Intel
I'm thinking of ordering one of these motherboards, which have the
newest dual-core Atom processor and NM10 chipset. I'm intrigued by its
low-power, fanless operation. I already have FreeBSD running on one of
the older Atom mobo's, so I know not to
On 24 Jan 2010, at 17:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
At this moment, I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, but I'm
not sure whether they are supported by FreeBSd 8/9. Any suggestions?
I'm actually looking for a replacement for my X-Fi (I have the PCI X-Fi Gamer).
The sound quality
Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd
perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2:
Supermicro X7SPA-H:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Supermicro X7SPA-HF:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:16:06 -0700
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:19:58AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I posted this recently on the GnuPG forum; however, no one had ever
seen it before.
FreeBSD-7.2
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.14
libgcrypt 1.4.4
gpa 0.9.0
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/
I have the card described later on the
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI
It depends on the bandwidth of the bus that it is on and the controller
itself.
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with
a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100
meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is,
Hi all,
I have a problem while writing divert sockets. I found a simple application
and modified it to compile in freebsd.
Simple divert socket application only prints incomming packet and reinject
packet to IP stack.
My simple application and test codes are available at (
Hi All
Anyone else having problems with wpi ?? I have upgraded the firmware,
helps a little but is still far from perfect.
Unless I continuously ping the gateway wpi silently drops the
connection. Even then connections to other servers on the lan are dodgy
unless I am actively pinging them to
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64
I've built a kernel with smbfs module:
# ls -al /boot/kernel/smb*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols
but can't load it:
# kldload smbfs
Thomas Dickey writes:
Terminal would probably be one of the programs using VTE,
which differs from linux.
This is all very interesting. Thanks to all. What I
normally do is start a command-line shell on a Debian Linux box.
This defaults to a linux console. When I ssh somewhere, ssh
2010/1/24 Nathan Butcher n-butc...@fusiongol.com
I'm just curious as to whether FreeBSD8.0 can support raw sockets on
some jails and not on others.
I'm trying to find the jail flags to allow this to happen. Not having
much luck.
Any ideas?
Hi List,
I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos
1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/
2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/
3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/
(2) is easy, most probably it means stable
how about (1) and (2)
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +
Masoom Shaikh masoom.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos
1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/
2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/
3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/
(2)
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64
I've built a kernel with smbfs module:
# ls -al /boot/kernel/smb*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680186 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko.symbols
but
When I run pwcview as a non-root user, it complains about permissions. The
perms were 644 on /dev/video0.
I set them to 666 and it works, but what is the intended approach?
Should I just create a device hint?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
RW wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +
Masoom Shaikh masoom.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos
1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/
2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/
3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/
On 01/25/10 06:35, Alexandre L. wrote:
You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and
polkit.
--- En date de : Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmannohart...@zedat..fu-berlin.de a
écrit :
De: O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails
À:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes=2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
but it does not set the correct routes.
--
Peter Ankerstål
On 01/25/10 04:19, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with
which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots
at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes=2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
Do it
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
01/25/10 09:11, Leslie Jensen skrev:
On 01/24/10 19:31, Bernt Hansson wrote:
You need thunderbird3-i18n not thunderbird-i18n.
Yes, of course. Unfortunately there's no change, after deinstalling and
rebuilding it's the same behaviour.
Thanks.
Found it! The Swedish language pack is
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=HIPMI=Y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
On Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 03:14:42 PST Dan Naumov wrote:
Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd
perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2:
Supermicro X7SPA-H:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Supermicro
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:46:57AM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 03:14:42 PST Dan Naumov wrote:
Not to steal your discussion thread, but I thought I'd ask (and you'd
perhaps too be interested) what's the status of FreeBSD on these 2:
Supermicro X7SPA-H:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:58:17AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
OK, I posted this on the 'GnuPG' list earlier; however, since you
requested further info, here it is.
Thanks.
This is the file that apparently GPA is loading that has those pesky
'certs':
/usr/local/share/gnupg
-r--r--r--1
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:25:21AM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote:
Thomas Dickey writes:
Terminal would probably be one of the programs using VTE,
which differs from linux.
This is all very interesting. Thanks to all. What I
normally do is start a command-line shell on a Debian Linux
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about
Alexander Motin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:38:47AM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64
I've built a kernel with smbfs module:
# ls -al /boot/kernel/smb*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 265579 25 Jan 13:36 /boot/kernel/smbfs.ko
-r-xr-xr-x
I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I
followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot).
Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to
load.
output:
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
(root@, Mon Jan 25 13:03:11 UTC
I guess I can either pre-buuild a kernel with options IPFIREWALL
and IPDIVERT, or I can load them via loader.conf. Why would
I not always do the latter? Is there any advantage to pre-linking them?
Thanks!
--
John Lind
j...@starfire.mn.org
___
On Monday 25 of January 2010 23:31:26 Ross Penner wrote:
I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I
followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot).
Everything went swimmingly until I rebooted and the system failed to
load.
output:
FreeBSD/i386
I am not able to execute any commands when I utilize the su function, I
am entering our correct password. It was working on Friday, but now it's
not. Also can you tell me how to install the module for Bacula, or
Amanda I keep getting an error message that module.info is missing. My
phone number is
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:51:26 +, Masoom Shaikh masoom.sha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi List,
I am confused about FreeBSD versions maintained in svn repos
1. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.0/
2. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/8.0.0/
3. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/
(2) is
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:54PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:38:47AM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r202964M ia64
I've built a kernel with smbfs module:
# ls -al /boot/kernel/smb*
Shone Russell wrote:
I am not able to execute any commands when I utilize the su function, I
am entering our correct password. It was working on Friday, but now it's
not.
Please let us know exactly what you're entering (without the password,
of course) and what the results are. Do you get
I had the same issue because i forgot to copy the zpool.cache under
/zroot/boot/zfs.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ross Penner ross.pen...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to set up a system using ZFS as the root filesystem. I
followed this guide: (http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot).
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:45 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning
of
the drive
Thanks for the link. That clears a few things up, but not quite what I'm
trying to achieve.I set the following in rc.conf for a jail called test
jail_test_flags=allow.raw_sockets
then I start the test jail with
# /etc/rc.d/jail start test
... and then I get the following cryptic response...
On 1/25/10, Nathan Butcher n-butc...@fusiongol.com wrote:
Thanks for the link. That clears a few things up, but not quite what I'm
trying to achieve.I set the following in rc.conf for a jail called test
jail_test_flags=allow.raw_sockets
then I start the test jail with
# /etc/rc.d/jail
53 matches
Mail list logo
