Hello.
I want to have a realtime priority for the particular daemon process launched
from X11 application.
Daemon is: jackd and app is: audio/ardour.
Previous ardour version(s) allowed me to go well with sox but no more for now.
It tries to execute:
jackd -d oss
and the error is:
If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thursday 17 November 2011 06:08:05 Nomen Nescio wrote:
If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root
servers
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
I hope the coffee wasn't too hot. I was just trying to convey meaning, not to
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:24:54 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know
about this and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
If these rootless people get control of what goes
On Thursday 17 November 2011 09:05:32 Jerry wrote:
Sorry, but I totally disagree with you assessment of this bill. First of
all, because I have not fully read it and secondly because I think it
may in fact have merit.
There are all ready too many scumbags who are illegally ripping off the
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:00:04 -0500
Rod Person articulated:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or
On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Rod Person wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly
On 2011-11-17 13:28, Mario Lobo wrote:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
There is and they need to be changed radically to reflect peoples actions.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:38:49 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:00:04 -0500
Rod Person articulated:
Theft is theft no matter how a socialist/fascist tries to color
it.
So what you are saying then is that there should be roadblocks on
ever street to
On 11/17/11 13:05, Jerry wrote:
First of all, because I have not fully read it...
it mean that you does *not* agree because *your* partial-ignorance?
and later you state Only a felon has a reason to fear such enforcement.
is there any better arguments to support that point of
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:02:39AM -0500, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I live, I
find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear them argument'
extremely naive.
It is not just naive, it is not an argument. If we would pass anything
On 11/17/11 9:02 AM, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I live, I
find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear them argument'
extremely naive.
To put it mildly. Before you know it, records of what you've been up to
on the Internet
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:16:50 -0500
Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 11/17/11 9:02 AM, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I
live, I find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear
them argument' extremely naive.
To put it
this message is appearing hundreds of times. I don't use the device, so
its more of a neatness thing but it also makes it difficult to use logs
when this error pops up every single second.
It doesn't begin at boot, usually after a few hours. But if I do plug it
into my router instead of using
Hi all,
I've a FreeBSD 8.2-release amd64 running with a few harddisks (3 in
UFS+journal, and 3 in zraid-3) for NAS. Yesterday I found the machine was
having problems in I/O with multiple harddisks, so I shut it down but it
failed to sync some of the harddisk.
fsck worked except for 1 UFS+journal
On Thursday 17 November 2011 11:02:39 Rod Person wrote:
Then once a new law is on the books, the officials find ways to use the
laws in way the were not intended as in the case of the Patriot Act
were it's use is over 90 some percent of the time has nothing to to
with terrorism.
This is
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:09:59AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2011 06:08:05 Nomen Nescio wrote:
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
Just in case you're not a totally alienated individual, this means that I
should not worry about the issue,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best way to
protect copyrighted material is stopping its
On Nov 17, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best way
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright infringement if you want to, but
please do not conflate two
Hi
Can I allow to process interrupts from re0 by multiples CPUs
I get one CPU overload while other idle
last pid: 14902; load averages: 1.92, 2.12, 1.96up 0+17:47:31 19:59:04
226 processes: 12 running, 197 sleeping, 17 waiting
CPU 0: 0.6% user, 0.0% nice, 1.2% system, 88.3%
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:56:06 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:06PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:06PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:41:51PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
Oh, of course -- pirated, like the hundreds of CDs and audiocasettes
and DVDs I have, though I've stopped consuming new music in any form from
corporations that sue their own customers.
clarification: Those are hundreds of CDs and
Quoth Jerry on Thursday, 17 November 2011:
Only those who break laws have a reason to fear them.
That statement carries large assumptions about the wisdom and
benevolence of government.
--
.O. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com
..O | sterl...@camdensoftware.com |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
I'd exhort readers to not take Jerry's absurd accusations and hostile
attitude to anyone who doesn't just applaud his every effort as an
indication that they should ignore the rest of what he says; in theory,
some of it might
My assessment is still being built so thanks for sharing your thoughts on
this, Jerry
Not that I paid attention to the proposal, because I decided a few decades
ago governments were the root of all evil and nothing they do is for
anybody's good. There isn't enough time in the universe to read
On Thursday 17 November 2011 17:28:39 Dave U. Random wrote:
They already p0wned the root servers. Look at the Microsoft case. The
federales went into private server farms and set up their own boxes. You
think anything goes through American backbones and the guys in black suits
with no sense of
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
If these rootless people get control of what
Hi,
I upgraded from 8.0 stable to 8.2 stable today. Now I can't connect to the
network through the network adapter. I've set DCHP and SYNCDHCP in /etc/rc.conf
and it worked in 8.0. It seems the dhclient problem. The ip address can't be
obtained.
When I run 'dhclient em0' manually, it shows
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has actually worked.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Only those who break laws have a reason to fear them.
That is a catastrophically incorrect view. Ask an attorney how much is spent
by corporations and private citizens defending themselves against both
wrongful lawsuits and wrongful prosecution. It's enough
I did reboot. It is the same thing.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has actually worked.
On 11/17/11 18:41, Xihong Yin wrote:
I did reboot. It is the same thing.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11 17:56, Xihong Yin wrote:
The ip address can't be obtained.
Have you tried rebooting FreeBSD and letting it obtain the IP itself?
On some OSes that has
I think the driver that comes with 8.2 stable just works fine.
When I manually run dhclient em0, it says ip address obtained. but ifconfig
em0 shows ip address of 0.0.0.0. And there is no default route in the 'netstat
-r' output.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/17/11
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded from 8.0 stable to 8.2 stable today. Now I can't connect to the
network through the network adapter. I've set DCHP and SYNCDHCP in
/etc/rc.conf and it worked in 8.0. It seems the dhclient problem. The ip
address can't be obtained.
When
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network
redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems
with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's
doable.
Thanks in advance, any tip will be appreciated.
--
Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:32 AM, John Kotrla jkot...@angelo.edu wrote:
I don't use the device,
[…]
any suggestions?
Compile it out of your kernel. You should be able to do this by adding:
nodevice re
to your kernel config and rebuilding.
As to the actual problem it sounds like it might be
42 matches
Mail list logo
