yes, with any two interfaces the bridge works well. tcpdump show these
messages when i configure bridge with more than 2 interfaces:
14:52:57.771505 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.4.157 tell 192.168.4.155,
length 46
14:52:57.771519 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown),
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Коньков Евгений wrote:
|
| HI, krad.
|
| How I can figure out the correspondence of bios drive number and
| freebsd numbering?
|
|
|
| Have a look at boot.config file you should be able to do something
| there
|
| On Dec 11, 2011 8:57 PM, Kon'kov Evgenij
i solve it:) the stp should be running on all interfaces
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, saeedeh motlagh saeedeh.motl...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, with any two interfaces the bridge works well. tcpdump show these
messages when i configure bridge with more than 2 interfaces:
14:52:57.771505
10.12.2011 04:22, Matt Mullins wrote:
For my systems, the canonical source of authentication information is
a Kerberos server, but I also want to support old-fashioned Unix
passwords for a handful of users (including myself) just in case the
Kerberos system is unreachable. I'm having a bit of
2011/12/12 Michael Ross g...@ross.cx:
Hello,
I am ... stuck.
I've been trying to setup mercurials web frontend with apache,
but apache won't start python.
Not as cgi-script, not with mod_python.
Investigating, I found this not only to be a problem with apache.
Situation now:
Users
Am 12.12.2011, 11:26 Uhr, schrieb David Demelier
demelier.da...@gmail.com:
2011/12/12 Michael Ross g...@ross.cx:
Hello,
I am ... stuck.
I've been trying to setup mercurials web frontend with apache,
but apache won't start python.
Not as cgi-script, not with mod_python.
Investigating, I
On Monday 12 of December 2011 06:31:46 Michael Ross wrote:
Hello,
I am ... stuck.
I've been trying to setup mercurials web frontend with apache,
but apache won't start python.
Not as cgi-script, not with mod_python.
Investigating, I found this not only to be a problem with apache.
Am 12.12.2011, 13:22 Uhr, schrieb Tomasz Kowalczyk kowalczf...@gmail.com:
On Monday 12 of December 2011 06:31:46 Michael Ross wrote:
Hello,
I am ... stuck.
I've been trying to setup mercurials web frontend with apache,
but apache won't start python.
Not as cgi-script, not with mod_python.
On 11/12/2011 19:31, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Good day,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD going on a soekris box with an atheros based D-Link
PCI wifi card. I intend to use this combination to bridge a difficult network
back to ethernet but right now I'm just trying to get the soekris associated
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
fsck.
But fsck needs to
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com wrote:
10.12.2011 04:22, Matt Mullins wrote:
auth optional pam_deny.so
auth sufficient pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass
auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass
Why you just haven't changed the last line to
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
filling up usr, etc. And root always stays protected! Its saved my life
a number
Im new to FreeBSD and did a FTP of 8.2 and unzipped to a cd rom. It
was an ISO Version. I then FTP the CDROM BOOT file and un zipped it.
Unfortunately It wont auto start when i put disk in computer startup.
Need support.. Is the windows format on disk causing problems?
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im new to FreeBSD and did a FTP of 8.2 and unzipped to a cd rom. It
was an ISO Version. I then FTP the CDROM BOOT file and un zipped it.
Unfortunately It wont auto start when i put disk in computer startup.
Need support.. Is the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im new to FreeBSD and did a FTP of 8.2 and unzipped to a cd rom. It
was an ISO Version. I then FTP the CDROM BOOT file and un zipped it.
Unfortunately It wont
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Michael W. Lucas
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to hook security/pam_ssh_agent_auth into sudo, and have
learned that PAM doesn't work the way I thought it did.
I'm running FreeBSD-9/i386, with sudo 1.7.2.6.
My goal is that sudo pass
Hello,
it is my second attempt to switch from Gentoo to FreeBSD because:
- if you google for FreeBSD you get sexy images of girls in red wear
(turn safe search off)
- I am a bit tired to upgrade my hardened servers
- zfs supposed to work better and faster
However I'am stuck at
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jerry McAllisterjerr...@msu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:36:04PM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im new to FreeBSD and did a FTP of 8.2 and unzipped to a cd rom. It
was an ISO Version. I then FTP the CDROM BOOT file and
First of all, always include the list in a response to something
from the list. Other people will be reading and may well know
more than me or any other person who responds. eg, don't just
send the follow-on question back to the one responding. Send it
to the list.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
filling up usr, etc. And root always stays
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:05:29PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
First of all, always include the list in a response to something
from the list. Other people will be reading and may well know
more than me or any other person who responds. eg, don't just
send the follow-on question back
On 12/13/11 04:09, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
On 12/13/11 09:58, Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:05:29PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
First of all, always include the list in a response to something
from the list. Other people will be reading and may well know
more than me or any other person who responds. eg, don't
On 12/12/2011 5:05 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:26:06PM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
do direct ftp to disk? And what do you mean by fixate?
No. You ftp the file down to the local machine and then use a CD burning
utility to burn file to the CD.
Daniel,
An ISO file
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/2011 5:05 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:26:06PM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
do direct ftp to disk? And what do you mean by fixate?
No. You ftp the file down to the local machine and then use a CD
I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
is actually implemented. I even started looking through the source
code, but that might take a while. My main questions are:
1. Difference between 'realtime'
This tiny routine is in a .so loadable module I use. (It's part of the
mailfront
SMTP daemon.)
static const char* date_string(void)
{
static char datebuf[64];
time_t now = time(0);
struct tm* tm = gmtime(now);
strftime(datebuf, sizeof datebuf - 1, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S -, tm);
return
In the last episode (Dec 13), John Levine said:
This tiny routine is in a .so loadable module I use. (It's part of the
mailfront SMTP daemon.)
static const char* date_string(void)
{
static char datebuf[64];
time_t now = time(0);
struct tm* tm = gmtime(now);
strftime(datebuf,
From: John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
This tiny routine is in a .so loadable module I use. (It's part of the
mailfront SMTP daemon.)
static const char* date_string(void)
{
static char datebuf[64];
time_t now = time(0);
struct tm* tm = gmtime(now);
strftime(datebuf, sizeof
how about a tiny .so that includes -only- that routine, and a 3-line or so
main() that links against -that- .so?
not a bad idea.
Mentioning O/S release level, and CPU architecture would be a good idea :)
Oh sorry, FreeBSD 8.2 release, AMD64
R's,
John
30 matches
Mail list logo
