On 03/05/2012 21:22, Darrel wrote:
If WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes exists in /etc/make.conf, will the system
compile against that as well or only applications?
The base system always links against the copy of openssl in base
irrespective of the WITH_OPENSSL_PORT setting:
% grep WITH_OPENSSL_PORT
On 03/05/2012 23:43, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Amazingly, this very question was covered on this list within the last few
hours. grin
It's not that much of a coincidence. We always get a rash of queries
like this every time there's a security advisory and consequently a lot
of people are
On 03/05/2012 22:52, Mike Brown wrote:
For example, with this latest OpenSSL security update, running
'freebsd-update
fetch' says (among other things) The following files will be updated as part
of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7 and WARNING: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 is
approaching its
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 4 02:54:56 2012
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:52:24 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: freebsd-update not updating reported patchlevel
On 03/05/2012 23:43, Robert Bonomi
I found myself incapable of rebuilding/updating editors/libreoffice on
ALL FreeBSD 9-STABLE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (amd64) platforms with the
very same error message as shown below.
It doesn't matter whether I try to build/update with CLANG or the legacy
gcc 4.2.1. GCC 4.6 and 4.7 fail due to
Le 02/05/2012 ? 22:44:19+0200, Jerome Herman a écrit
Ok here is what happens,
In your system you have your touchpad declared both in a static way in
your xorg config, and probed by HAL.
What happens is that when xorg starts it first install the touchpad as
required by the config file,
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level,
and the patchlevel of the entire base system.
Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel. Use the 'standard'
THREE-level version numbering
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level,
and the patchlevel of the entire base system.
Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel. Use the 'standard'
On 2012-05-04 10:45, Polytropon wrote:
Allow me to extent the approach: For -STABLE versions (e. g. if
updated per CVS), those files could contain the build number
and the date of the currently installed -STABLE snapshot.
A separation of a kernel version file and a world version
file is useful
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Cc:
Subject: editors/libreoffice:internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280
I found myself incapable of rebuilding/updating editors/libreoffice on
ALL FreeBSD 9-STABLE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (amd64) platforms with the
very same error message
On 05/04/12 19:01, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Cc:
Subject: editors/libreoffice:internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280
I found myself incapable of rebuilding/updating editors/libreoffice on
ALL FreeBSD 9-STABLE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (amd64)
First of all, thanks for explaining your point of view.
Allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:44:49 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation
On 4 May 2012, at 16:45, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level,
and the patchlevel of the entire base system.
Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik Nørgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote:
On 04/05/2012 19:51, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
So I checked the 2 other main contenders and just wanted to ask if
anyone here had an opinion what 2 install of the BSDs ? Or perhaps
FreeBSD 6.4 is a good choice ( I have
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:45:17PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik N?rgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote:
On 04/05/2012 19:51, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
So I checked the 2 other main contenders and just wanted to ask if
anyone here had an opinion what 2
I have zfs-on-root using the classical documentation (everything under
zpool, possibly with some sub-mounts, but I've left those out lately).
Is there a way to transition my system to a form that beadm expects?
I tried just running it, and it's upset that zpool/ROOT doesn't exist.
Hi,
I
vermaden == vermaden verma...@interia.pl writes:
vermaden # fetch https://github.com/vermaden/beadm/blob/master/beadm
Heh. That's HTML. I think you want
fetch https://raw.github.com/vermaden/beadm/master/beadm
vermaden # chmod +x beadm
vermaden # ./beadm list
vermaden # ./beadm activate
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:45:51 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
First of all, thanks for explaining your point of view.
Allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:44:49 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Randal == Randal L Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com writes:
vermaden == vermaden verma...@interia.pl writes:
vermaden # fetch https://github.com/vermaden/beadm/blob/master/beadm
Randal and after reboot, zfs set mountpoint=none zroot would also seem to
Randal clean that up.
Oh wait, it looks
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:45:17PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik N?rgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote:
On 04/05/2012 19:51, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
So I checked the 2 other main contenders and just
Randal == Randal L Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com writes:
Randal Oh wait, it looks like zroot is still holding 1.04G of data... will
Randal that ever go away? Shouldn't all the data be in the /ROOT/xxx
Randal items?
And worse, the things from the readme don't work:
locohost# ./beadm create
Randal == Randal L Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com writes:
Randal This is FreeBSD 8.2.
And no difference on 8.3 :(
Should there have been a promote in there somewhere? It looks like
the boot env is still dependent on the very old zroot.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services,
On Fri, 4 May 2012 17:11:00 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
For obselete hardware one frequetly has no alternative but to run an
obselete operating system.
Depending on the actual intention of use, it _may_ be no
problem to use obsolete operating systems and software.
(For example, I still
how about
`ifconfig wlan0 mode 11b`
11g sticks very soon for me and some other people.
Regards,
Buganini
2012/5/5 Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk:
I've US Robotics 5411 wireless pccard device.
It's identified as:
# pciconf -lv
*skip*
siba_bwn0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000
On 5/4/2012 5:10 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Randal == Randal L Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com writes:
Randal Oh wait, it looks like zroot is still holding 1.04G of data... will
Randal that ever go away? Shouldn't all the data be in the /ROOT/xxx
Randal items?
And worse, the things
Hello list!
What and why is this?
4294967287 messages downloaded
It does not make sense.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
26 matches
Mail list logo
