On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote:
I thought this URL http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html also shown
above, answered that question.
Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superficially like a good
idea to me. However, instant reaction is that this is definitely *not*
something that
On 06/06/2012 08:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On deeper thought though, the whole idea appears completely unworkable.
It means that you will not be able to compile your own kernel or
drivers unless you have access to a signing key. As building your own
is pretty fundamental to the FreeBSD
Hi,
I've set up isc-dhcpd (/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server). The daemon
runs, hands out IP-addresses however logging doesn't seem to work.
Here's what I've got in the respective config-files:
/etc/rc.conf:
# dhcpd
dhcpd_enable=YES
dhcpd_conf=/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
dhcpd_ifaces=em0
On 06/06/2012 09:45, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 06/06/2012 08:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On deeper thought though, the whole idea appears completely unworkable.
It means that you will not be able to compile your own kernel or
drivers unless you have access to a signing key. As building your own
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/06/2012 09:45, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 06/06/2012 08:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On deeper thought though, the whole idea appears completely unworkable.
It means that you will not be able to compile your own
jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
Quoting Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
I don't see how this MS
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:38:41 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 06/06/2012 09:45, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 06/06/2012 08:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On deeper thought though, the whole idea appears completely
unworkable. It means that you will not be able to compile your own
kernel or drivers
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
They should have taken this into account a long time ago. In any
case, we are talking $99 dollars total, not per user here for the
certificate. If that is going to cause a problem, I'll donate the $99.
It's not the $99 that'll be the problem, but the fact
On 06/06/2012 11:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
It's not the $99 that'll be the problem, but the fact that it's
Verisign (actually Symantec, since they bought Verisign) that you deal
with. Whereas Globalsign accept applications from individuals,
Verisign require company documents before they'll
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99
goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as
many binaries as you want.
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote:
I thought this URL http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html also shown
above, answered that question.
Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superficially like a good
idea to me. However, instant reaction is
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99
goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as
many binaries as you want.
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99
goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as
many binaries as you want.
Having to pay Verisign instead
On 6/6/12 1:36 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote:
I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99
goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as
many binaries as you
Not strictly FBSD, but ...
Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as in:
FOO = bar.
The problem is that 'bar' may also be know as, say, bar.sh. Worse still
both bar and bar.sh can exist with one linked to the other. Is there
a simple way to determine which form bar or
On 6/6/12 9:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote:
I thought this URL http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html also shown
above, answered that question.
Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superficially like a good
idea to me. However, instant reaction is
On 6/6/12 1:19 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote:
I thought this URL http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html also shown
above, answered that question.
Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superficially like a
Hi everybody,
Let say my computer is connected to the internet with a cable modem and has a
dynamic IP address via DHCP. This address is refreshed after every random days.
I want to know the new address even when I'm not home. Like send an e-mail with
the new IP, I already know how to do this,
On 6/5/12 9:12 PM, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel
binaries http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
That's restriction is only for ARM devices which have a label that says
Desgined for Windows8. In other words
On 6/6/12 1:57 AM, Chris Hill wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote:
For the time being only ARM platform is restricted.
True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by
MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I believe their ultimate goal is
to add
Hi,
I got a VM VirtualBox that use FreeBSD 9-STABLE (updated yesterday).
Now I want to update my ports, but I can't update virtualbox-ose-additions
4.1.16
I use the command # portmaster -a -D --no-confirm to update ports with
portmaster tool.
The error is :
[...]
The failing command:
@cc
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Erich wrote:
Hi
I have had success on my hardware with this setting:
# The working configuration. The mouse daemon in /etc/rc.conf
# was dsabled.
#
# Section ServerLayout
# Identifier X.org Configured
#
El día Wednesday, June 06, 2012 a las 02:06:48AM -0700, Dánielisz László
escribió:
Hi everybody,
Let say my computer is connected to the internet with a cable modem and has a
dynamic IP address via DHCP. This address is refreshed after every random
days.
I want to know the new address
2012-06-06 13:36, kwel kwel skrev:
Please remove my email from your database i don't want to receive any other
mail from you plzz thanks !
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Matthias Apitz writes:
Let say my computer is connected to the internet with a cable
modem and has a dynamic IP address via DHCP. This address is
refreshed after every random days.
I want to know the new address even when I'm not home. Like
send an e-mail with the new IP, I already
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 6:37:43 Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Erich wrote:
Hi
I have had success on my hardware with this setting:
# The working configuration. The mouse daemon in /etc/rc.conf
# was dsabled.
#
# Section
El día Wednesday, June 06, 2012 a las 09:17:47AM -0400, Robert Huff escribió:
Run this in a cronjob:
lynx -dump myip.nl | fgrep 'WAN IP'
strore the result in a file and when it changes, trigger a mail;
Or, using only tools in the base system:
ifconfig | head | grep
m
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 07:37:57 2012
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 02:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E1nielisz_L=E1szl=F3?= laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: IP - e-mail
Hi everybody,
Let
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:36:24 -0400
Jerry wrote:
In any event, it won't belong before some hacker comes up with a way
to circumvent the entire process anyway,
It sounds like Fedora already have. They say that they are only going to
sign a thin shim that loads grub.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Huff
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:18 AM
To: Matthias Apitz
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IP - e-mail
Matthias Apitz writes:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:11:02 -0500, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Matthias, your lynx-based 'solution' does *NOT* solve the OP's question.
Incorrect; it does solve his problem.
He wants to know -when- his DHCP assigned address changes. Consider
what happens if both the
2012-06-04 16:10, Leslie Jensen skrev:
2012-06-04 15:54, Warren Block skrev:
% printf \033];Funny Title\007
Works!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:36:24 -0400 Jerry wrote:
In any event, it won't belong before some hacker comes up with a way
to circumvent the entire process anyway,
It sounds like Fedora already have. They say that they are only going to
sign a thin shim
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have to pay anything to a third party in order to
run whatever OS I want on a piece of hardware I own?
Maybe a common marketing and sales model
I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing key
have to keep it secret?
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
Otherwise one of us would purchase a key for $99, then publish
the key so we could all forever more compile boot our own kernels.
But that would
It is time to do the above for me. I have done several upgrades within the
same major version but have not done a version hop yet. Aside from extra
paranoia about backups and the need to rebuild all ports, are there other
gotchas to watch out for? I am going to try it on a test VM system first.
On 2012-06-05 17:20, Jerry wrote:
The question that I have not seen answered in this thread is what
FreeBSD intents to do. From what I have seen, most FreeBSD users do
not
use the latest versions of most hardware, so it may be a while before
its user base is even effected.
I don't believe
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing key
have to keep it secret?
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
A limited-liability company with no assets is judgement-proof.
Otherwise one of us would purchase a
Hi,
Can someone suggest an alternative/proper way to port forward using ipfw. Right
now I have the following and some bad clients cause too many FIN_WAIT_2 state
fwd IP,PORT2 tcp from any to me dst-port PORT1 keep-state
This easily causes DoS for when too many FIN_WAIT_2 are created and IPFW
On 6/6/12 6:45 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing
key
have to keep it secret?
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
A limited-liability company with no assets is
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Simon si...@optinet.com wrote:
This easily causes DoS for when too many FIN_WAIT_2 are created and IPFW
stops forwarding using the rule above because of too many dynamic rules
Change the defaults for the fw.dyn sysctl MIB nodes
to something like
On 6/6/12 7:23 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing key
have to keep it secret?
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
Contract with _whom_? The party you pay money to -- Verisign --
In the last episode (Jun 06), Michael Sierchio said:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Simon si...@optinet.com wrote:
This easily causes DoS for when too many FIN_WAIT_2 are created and IPFW
stops forwarding using the rule above because of too many dynamic
rules
Change the defaults for
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0400
Daniel Staal articulated:
On 2012-06-05 17:20, Jerry wrote:
The question that I have not seen answered in this thread is what
FreeBSD intents to do. From what I have seen, most FreeBSD users do
not
use the latest versions of most hardware, so it may be a
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:05:59 +0100
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/06/2012 18:28, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?
Yes, endlessly. Mostly on lists like freebsd-hackers@... and at
various conferences and developer summits.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:11 PM, 文鳥 bunc...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:05:59 +0100
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/06/2012 18:28, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?
You might be interested in this video:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 13:46:43 2012
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:44:57 +0200
From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware
of?
On 6/6/12 7:23 PM, Robert Bonomi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:34:27PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
what I want to do is get as current as possible and then
install 7.5. and stay there.
7.5 what? Do you mean Xorg? Please try and be specific.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/6/12 6:45 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing
key
have to keep it secret?
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
A
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:44:57 -0500, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
If the key should be divulged, then the key may be revoked by the issuer.
Revoked how? Wouldn't they have to issue a firmware update to actually
revoke it? The UEFI firmware doesn't have network access
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0400
Daniel Staal articulated:
On 2012-06-05 17:20, Jerry wrote:
The question that I have not seen answered in this thread is what
FreeBSD intents to do. From what I have seen, most FreeBSD users
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have to pay anything to a third party in order to
run whatever OS I want on a piece of hardware I own?
Yes, let's all run ALPHA and MIPS hardware. I'll just jam my Nvidia card
into one of the available slots and everything should work OK, right?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:55:16 -0400
Robert Simmons articulated:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0400
Daniel Staal articulated:
On 2012-06-05 17:20, Jerry wrote:
The question that I have not seen answered in this thread is what
On 2012-06-06 15:05, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0400
Daniel Staal articulated:
I don't believe at this point FreeBSD has any intent one way or
another, really. It's not an immediate problem for any platform
supported by the FreeBSD project, at least for a technically-inclined
Isn't there a lot of needless handwaving going on when the spec is
pretty clear that installing your own complete PKI tree will all
boil down to what is effectively a jumper on the motherboard?
First, some sanity...
Users could fully utilize the UEFI Secure Boot hardware by say:
- Using
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 12:33:25 2012
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:28:19 -0700
From: Thomas D. Dean tomd...@speakeasy.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Why Clang
Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?
I would like to know the
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dave U. Random
anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have to pay
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:23:20PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I agree with the whole post except that last bit about ICANN Matthew.
The US already has enough dominance as is, without involving ICANN, a
supposedly neutral body (yeah right...) any further.
Indeed. The last thing we need
The message log on my machine is filling up with this error message:
Jun 6 11:36:55 raven pulseaudio[6440]: sink-input.c: Failed to create sink
input: too many inputs per sink.
Jun 6 11:36:58 raven pulseaudio[6440]: sink-input.c: Failed to create sink
input: too many inputs per sink.
Jun 6
Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
anyway NOBODY are forced to buy micro-soft software.
That's almost correct but not quite. In 99% of the cases any Intel commodity
mafiaware comes with a preinstalled Winblows. You're paying for it whether
you want it or not. You can get a refund in
On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net
wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
point is why should I have to pay anything to
On 06/06/2012 09:11, Leslie Jensen wrote:
My initial wish for some information about the build progress is still
very much on the table.
Try the attached patch. It essentially adds the progress info that is
being put in the TERM title to the in-line printout of the dependency
trail that was
On 06/06/2012 15:06, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 09:11, Leslie Jensen wrote:
My initial wish for some information about the build progress is still
very much on the table.
Try the attached patch.
Actually try this one instead. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your
On 06/06/2012 20:27, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Suppose I put up a web app that takes an executable as input, signs it
with my key, and returns the signed filt to the submitter. I don't
divulge the key to anyone, just use it on 'anything'. Anybody
attempting to revoke on _that_ basis is asking for a
I have a blank white page after I log into phpmyadmin. I have upgraded to
php 5.4.3 along with the extensions. Also upgraded to current phpmyadmin.
Have checked the error logs and nothing is showing in the logs. Any idea
what happended. phpmyadmin was working before upgrade.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/6/12 7:16 PM, be...@norden1.com wrote:
I have a blank white page after I log into phpmyadmin. I have
upgraded to php 5.4.3 along with the extensions. Also upgraded to
current phpmyadmin. Have checked the error logs and nothing is
showing in
Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ?
A limited-liability company with no assets is judgement-proof.
There's set up running costs (time money), other exposure
http://berklix.com/~jhs/mecc/ltd_gmbh.html
Easiest done by those who have done it before, One would
freebsd-questions:
I have a new computer with an Intel i7-2600S processor and DQ67SWB3
motherboard that I'd like to run with ZFS, virtual machine host,
desktop, Samba, and terminal server (on second NIC).
Can this be done with FreeBSD; if so, which distribution and
ports/packages do I need?
Thank you for this.
I didn't realize that a simple (somewhat technical) question asked in
all innocence would generate so much flammage.
Kurt
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:13 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't there a lot of needless handwaving going on when the spec is
pretty clear that
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 18:13:09 2012
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:09:54 +0100
From: Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be
On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
[ ... ]
It may seem reasonable to you, but is there -legal- basis to do so?
Go ask your lawyer. freebsd-questions isn't qualified to provide you with
legal advice.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 19:01:14 2012
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:59:36 -0700
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be
Bug report for /usr/bin/calendar
SUMMARY: calendar does not match Thu+1 or Mon+1 in some months.
With one exception, it looks like calendar file dates such as Thu+1
and Mon+1 are failing to match in two cases: (1) the 7th of Jan-Nov,
and (2) December.
DETAILS/EXAMPLES:
FreeBSD crystal
(cf. EULA) that you accept those licensing of hardware.
Also, I think you'll find that such actions are already illegal
certainly in the UK, and I believe EU wide.
Yes illegal for English law (England Scotland have different
contract laws). Contract terms given after money changes
hands
Hi,
Please report bugs with send-pr
(cos bug reports to mail list get lost)
See
man send-pr
If you can attach a patch to fix it, so much the better
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, cumulative like a
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
Yes, let's all run ALPHA and MIPS hardware. I'll just jam my Nvidia card
into one of the available slots and everything should work OK, right?
Dear Numbskull,
It's co-dependent hostages like you who enable Intel Mafiaware. According to
your logic we should
Hi guys I'm excitedly posting this from my phone. Good news for you guys, bad
news for us -- we were building HA storage on vmware for a client and can now
replicate the crash on demand. I'll be posting details when I get home to my PC
tonight, but this hopefully is enough to replicate the
Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net
wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dave U. Random
anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference:
- Original Message -
From: David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com
I have a new computer with an Intel i7-2600S processor and DQ67SWB3
motherboard that I'd like to run with ZFS, virtual machine host,
desktop, Samba, and terminal server (on second NIC).
Can this be done with
in message 4fcf48af@tundraware.com,
wrote Tim Daneliuk thusly...
...
Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as in:
FOO = bar.
The problem is that 'bar' may also be know as, say, bar.sh.
...
Is there a simple way to determine which form bar or bar.sh on
on a given
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 03:05:00PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
I don't know of any user personally who purchased a new PC and then
threw FreeBSD on it. Most users that I have come into contact with use
2+ year old units that have been replaced by shiny new Windows units. I
don't see that changing
Running under X with xfce, just did this:
gpart show -l da0
gpart delete -i 1 da0
gpart destroy da0
gpart create -s GPT da0
gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr da0
gpart add -t freebsd-boot -i 1 -s 512K -l gptboot da0
gpart bootcode -b /boot/gptboot -i 1 da0
gpart add -t
84 matches
Mail list logo
