On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Yes, Clang in general produces slower binaries than gcc. Is that in
dispute or something? Or is this just repetition in case we
didn't hear you the first time?
just yesterday i've heard lots of otherwise
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Yes, Clang in general produces slower binaries than gcc. Is that in
dispute or something? Or is this just repetition in case we
didn't hear you the first time?
just yesterday i've heard lots of
I tried to update an amd64 FreeBSD 9.0 p0 system via freebsd-update tonight.
It fetched everything fine. However, the install just hung after about 10
minutes. The 2 sh processes are basically doing nothing. Not consuming any
processor time and not doing any I/O. I killed it and tried
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Does GPLv3 does force programs you compile with gcc to be GPLed?
As far as I know, the main difference is that the GPLv3 is
often called a viral license. Software linking against v3
libraries and so maybe
Here[1] we can read a program linking agains a gpl v3 library should be released
under the gplv3 too. However, the only concern would be when the program is
implicitly linked against libgcc right? Well, there's even an
exception[2] for this.
this is exactly how i understand that. Anyway
long term goals. Eliminating, or at least not being dependent on a GNU
toolchain. GPL v3 brings with it a whole host problems such as:
As you already know i don't like GPL very much. As i already said for me
GNU is computer communism.
But like or not like, i don't prefer my likeness above
Dale Scott skrev 2012-06-14 14:59:
Should I install the libc souces?
I had this error when upgrading 8.x (8.1 to 8.2?), and solved it by creating
the directory only (actual sources not required). I recall someone had
posted this solution to the list at the time.
Regards,
Dale
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
OK? Can you just answer that simple question clearly?
Yes Wojciech, I can attempt an answer for you. Pay attention, this gets
very complex.
The decision to move to Clang was motivated by what is best for
i have samba server and few virtualbox sessions using vboxnet which is
started by /usr/local/etc/rc.d/vboxheadless
i want samba to be started AFTER vboxheadless as the latter configures
vboxnet0 automatically when started, and samba do bind to vboxnet0.
so i appended vboxheadless to REQUIRE:
Yes Wojciech, I can attempt an answer for you. Pay attention, this gets very
complex.
The decision to move to Clang was motivated by what is best for the project,
and not what is best for Wojciech.
still not stopped personal attacks (last part of last sentence) but lets
forget.
So please
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Here[1] we can read a program linking agains a gpl v3 library should
be released
under the gplv3 too. However, the only concern would be when the
program is
implicitly linked against libgcc right? Well, there's even an
exception[2] for this.
this is exactly how i
The answer is:
1. gcc will still be available through the ports system.
2. The move to clang/llvm as a default compiler will reduce the amount
of GPL code in the base system, eventually reducing distribution
issues (especially for 3rd parties).
3. clang/llvm provides better error and warning
On 20/06/2012 09:24, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i have samba server and few virtualbox sessions using vboxnet which is
started by /usr/local/etc/rc.d/vboxheadless
i want samba to be started AFTER vboxheadless as the latter configures
vboxnet0 automatically when started, and samba do bind to
Create a new file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/precedence with the following
contents:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
:
Make it executable. Note -- the ':' does seem to be necessary.
thank you for help. I
The bad thing about GPLv3 is that if anyone commits any code under this
license into the tree vendors that use our code base for making their own
OSes will ditch FreeBSD as they can be sued by FSF. Juniper for example. It
would be wise to listen to their point of view on GPLv3.
not really
1. gcc will still be available through the ports system.
As well as clang is available in ports. not an argument.
2. The move to clang/llvm as a default compiler will reduce the amount
of GPL code in the base system, eventually reducing distribution
issues (especially for 3rd parties).
On 20/06/2012 09:51, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Create a new file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/precedence with the following
contents:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
:
Make it executable. Note -- the
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The bad thing about GPLv3 is that if anyone commits any code under
this license into the tree vendors that use our code base for making
their own OSes will ditch FreeBSD as they can be sued by FSF. Juniper
for example. It would be wise to listen to their point of view on
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:51:04 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
Create a new file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/precedence with the
following contents:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
I have some trouble with pf on freebsd bridge.
Network topology:
( untrust ) -- { em0 , bridge0 , em1 } -- ( trust )
Bridge Network: 10.1.1.0/24
bridge0 IP: 10.1.1.1 ( freebsd's ip )
default gw: 10.1.1.254 ( in untrust area )
server: 10.1.1.101 ~ 200 ( in trust area )
pf.conf on freebsd
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
5. clang/llvm is more modular than gcc, although there are plans for
gcc to become as modular, it will take time.
Doesn't matter how it is written, but how it performs.
That's a hard one. I remember an error in gcc loop optimizer which makes
gcc produce SSE2 opcodes
I have searched for ppmtoxpm in ports and in FreeBSD Search Services to
no avail.
ppmtoxpm converts a portable pixmap into an X11 pixmap.
Is there a freebsd equivalent or alternative?
-- david
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
:
Make it executable. Note -- the ':' does seem to be necessary.
thank you for help. I will test it when being on place and could reboot.
But still - do you know why it
I have searched for ppmtoxpm in ports and in FreeBSD Search Services to
no avail.
ppmtoxpm converts a portable pixmap into an X11 pixmap.
Is there a freebsd equivalent or alternative?
No equivalent just the same netpbm package
/usr/ports/graphics/netpbm
And why you think it's not better then gcc?
because - as you already should know - test shows otherwise.
As well as FreeBSD running predictable with gcc anyway.
Still theory and ideology.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
[ Semi-apologies to all for being blunt, and possibly somewhat offensive. ]
[ More tactful approaches have been shown to be ineffective, and Wojceich ]
[ has a demonstrated propensity to blather on as though he knows more ]
[ about everything than anyone else.
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 20 03:51:43 2012
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:51:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: seems i cannot fully understand
Hi,
MSI-x supports upto 2048 vectors but what I see in freebsd 8.2 is that when
I use more than ~30 vectors, system becomes dead slow.
Is there a limitation on number of msi vectors that can be used in 8.2?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
BSDL in opposite is often criticized a rape me license.
No, it is not, except perhaps by lying atheist Marxist bastards and his
religious adherents.
Please don't use atheist as a derogatory term. There are plenty of
capitalistic
I am also a newcomer and I agree with Stephen. But I guess the only
way is to simply ignore those who make such statements. I don't see
much benefit in arguing or reasoning with them.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stephen Cook scli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:04:47 +0200
Fred Morcos articulated:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stephen Cook scli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
BSDL in opposite is often criticized a rape me license.
No, it is not, except perhaps by lying
Hi
This is on HP Compaq 6715s laptop, amd64, r236740M.
At some point (prior to the recent png- triggered
update) I started seeing this strainge behaviour:
The top part of the screen, about 1/4, is not updated
by some windows, and the exact behaviour is affected
by Option AccelMethod. For
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
--
View this message in context:
I'm a relative newcomer. Are the FreeBSD mailing lists always this flame-y? I
no. it is temporary.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:45:07 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
:
Make it executable. Note -- the ':' does seem to be necessary.
Why? None of the dummy scripts in the
A somewhat haphazardly search of the postings in this forum would seem
to indicate that any post questioning the ethics or usefulness of
FreeBSD as compared to other operating systems that elicit six or more
strange but usefulness of FreeBSD wasn't questioned.
By the way Fred, please don't
But still - do you know why it is necessary?
An explanation written some 80 years ago;
'Because that way it will work'.
if you don't have anything to say - just don't do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
still not stopped personal attacks (last part of last sentence) but lets
forget.
Fact; that was NOT a personal attack. Your entire line of reasoning so far
has been about -your- preferences, and things as you see them, for _your_
What is specifically my preference?
1) Your opinion about
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:47:29 +0100
RW articulated:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:45:07 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE: samba
:
Make it executable. Note -- the ':'
Hi FreeBSD -
I have an AMD HD 7950 video card so I am trying to install the latest
FreeBSD xorg available (7.5.2) for an updated driver.
When I start make the install immediately stops at MesaLib-7.6.1.tar.gz.
I can restart it on a primary using the location given then after a short
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).
or rather - discussion is a rule :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
On 20.06.2012 13:45, Jakub Lach wrote:
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
Actually I can't remember any flame-war about
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
And why you think it's not better then gcc?
because - as you already should know - test shows otherwise.
Test show only that clang-compiled binaries are still subject for
improvement. It doesn't show how strict and clear this binary is.
As well as FreeBSD running
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
A somewhat haphazardly search of the postings in this forum would
seem to indicate that any post questioning the ethics or usefulness
of FreeBSD as compared to other operating systems that elicit six
or more
speed estimates.
there are a difference between speed estimate and actual speed - and i
talk about the latter only.
Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc now. And they
are fine with that one.
their problem.
___
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is the
first one.
because such situation like now never happened - changing C compiler to
much worse
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:59:51 Stephen Cook wrote:
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
[snip childish invective]
I'm a relative newcomer. Are the FreeBSD mailing lists always this
flame-y? I realize that this particular post might be trolling / satire
No, they
On 6/20/12 11:09 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 20/06/2012 09:51, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Create a new file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/precedence with the following
contents:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba.
# PROVIDE: precedence
# REQUIRE: vboxheadless
# BEFORE:
Hello all,
I am new to FreeBSD, coming from a GNU/Linux background (most
comfortable with Archlinux). I compiled a series of questions I would
like to ask in different areas and categories. Should I send them all
in a single email message or should I split them by subject/topic into
different
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:59:51 Stephen Cook wrote:
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
[snip childish invective]
I'm a relative newcomer. Are the FreeBSD mailing lists always this
flame-y?
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, David Tilbrook wrote:
I have searched for ppmtoxpm in ports and in FreeBSD Search Services to
no avail.
ppmtoxpm converts a portable pixmap into an X11 pixmap.
Is there a freebsd equivalent or alternative?
In the ports, graphics/netpbm.
Wojciech,
Why not make FreeBSD better for everyone by cooperating with the CLANG
project?
1. Find simple programs with severe performance issues
2. Report to the CLANG developers
3. They fix, tweak, and tune the compiler
4. FreeBSD imports latest release
5. Everybody wins
Polytropon wrote:
I assume it's just an aspect of still being too young in
regards of missing the difference between freedom and
anarchy: the right to extend one's freedom is limited
as soon as it limits the freedom of others. Maybe another
aspect is the lack of discussion culture and the
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 19:32:24 Fred Morcos wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD, coming from a GNU/Linux background (most
comfortable with Archlinux). I compiled a series of questions I would
like to ask in different areas and categories. Should I send them all
in a single email message or
They could be reduced by a combo. of eg:
- forcible unsub, black list,
- block of anon. remailer domains
- making this list subscribtion required before posting.
(which would make it harder for newbies fresh to
FreeBSD, but we need some
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is
the first
I am new to FreeBSD, coming from a GNU/Linux background (most
comfortable with Archlinux). I compiled a series of questions I would
like to ask in different areas and categories. Should I send them all
in a single email message or should I split them by subject/topic into
different emails?
it is only a proof that it was decided to put it as FreeBSD default
compiler.
Everything is said, explained and discusse why this decision is made.. So
Explanation about the decision was already made isn't explanation.
but i don't require any explanation. actually i don't require anything.
Why not make FreeBSD better for everyone by cooperating with the CLANG
project?
because we already have great compiler - GCC. In spite of using GPL
licence.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:14:09PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
And why you think it's not better then gcc?
because - as you already should know - test shows otherwise.
You just ignored everything Volodymyr Kostyrko said about the other
factors that are also important for a compiler being
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:16:43PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
speed estimates.
there are a difference between speed estimate and actual speed - and
i talk about the latter only.
You're talking about poorly managed benchmarks that are imprecise and
prone to fluctuation, applying only to
Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc now. And
they are fine with that one.
I wish that or something like that were true, but pcc is dead even in
OpenBSD packages/ports. There was just some discussion on misc@
I am hoping for the day gcc is only used on Linux and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:27:33AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
Adding a new mode should not be needed for most monitors. I do this
to set up the external video:
xrandr --output VGA --above LVDS
That's to span a single desktop over both monitors.
Some desktop environments have their
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:32:24 +0200, Fred Morcos wrote:
Hello all,
I am new to FreeBSD, coming from a GNU/Linux background (most
comfortable with Archlinux). I compiled a series of questions I would
like to ask in different areas and categories. Should I send them all in
a single email
These are good guidelines to follow:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/article.html
Try to avoid X Y problems. Initiating it with the root question will give
the best results.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Fred Morcos fred.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I'm quite new to FreeBSD too (RHEL/Fedora background), and am most
impressed with it so far.
rather huge difference.
Secondly (and probably stating the obvious), the handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
is the place I always look first.
and third - manuals.
I wish that or something like that were true, but pcc is dead even in
OpenBSD packages/ports. There was just some discussion on misc@
I am hoping for the day gcc is only used on Linux and many free compilers
are used everywhere else.
me too. but first we need to have Free compiler that would be
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.
Why is that so important for you?
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I have some friends that develop software. They had released it under
GNU umbrella. Later on, other folks were taking advantage and not
isn't it that once you release your own work as GPL you don't really own
this and even you cannot use it in closed source software?
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.
Why is that so important for you?
if you would read even less than carefully the topic you will get the
answer.
___
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.
Why is that so important for you?
if you would read even less than carefully the
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
But still - do you know why it is necessary?
An explanation written some 80 years ago;
'Because that way it will work'.
if you don't have anything to say - just don't do it.
practice what you preach.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:06:31 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I have some friends that develop software. They had released it under
GNU umbrella. Later on, other folks were taking advantage and not
isn't it that once you release your own work as GPL you don't really own
this and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06:31PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I have some friends that develop software. They had released it under
GNU umbrella. Later on, other folks were taking advantage and not
isn't it that once you release your own work as GPL you don't really
own this and even
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:07:09PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
email elided for purposes of courtesy wrote:
Will i be able to compile FreeBSD base system with gcc after some time?
not sure.
Why is that so important for you?
if you would read even less than carefully the topic you will get
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:40:56PM +0400, Евгений Лактанов wrote:
20.06.2012 18:47, Mark Felder пишет:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:43:14 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
email address elided for purposes of courtesy wrote:
[attribution lost by Wojciech Puchar and I'm too lazy to check]
Why not make
I don't seem to have generated much comment.
I suspect you are thinking as I do that if your servers don't immediately
download then their is a bandit on my Internet line??
--- Forwarded message ---
From: Lynn Steven Killingsworth blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com
To:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Lynn Steven Killingsworth
blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seem to have generated much comment.
I suspect you are thinking as I do that if your servers don't immediately
download then their is a bandit on my Internet line??
Newer AMD
FreeBSD 9 (x86_64).
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I have googled assiduously and found nothing
useful.
I have installed Flash, following the instructions in the handbook.
It works well, and the video element seems fine and smooth. But on (for
example) YouTube, there is no audio at all.
This is
isn't it that once you release your own work as GPL you don't really own
this and even you cannot use it in closed source software?
Releasing something as GPL does not mean you give up
copyright. If I understood this whole thing correctly,
I'm not a lawyer but i repeat what i've read time ago,
isn't it that once you release your own work as GPL you don't really
own this and even you cannot use it in closed source software?
When you license something, you still own the copyright. You can then
release it under other licenses as well, and for versions you have
modified you can release
21.06.2012 01:14, Chad Perrin пишет:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:40:56PM +0400, Евгений Лактанов wrote:
20.06.2012 18:47, Mark Felder пишет:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:43:14 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
email address elided for purposes of courtesy wrote:
[attribution lost by Wojciech Puchar and I'm too
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:57:17 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
from what i know (still, possibly incorrent) if i am hired as a programmer
and write a program, this program belong to the company and i couldn't use
it everywhere at least officially.
That is highly debatable and mostly
You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You
i don't talk that case, but if i am hired to write some part of program as
an employer in software company.
So - if authors of any project, no matter how numerous, will all
without exception agree that they want to get rid of GPL,
the answer.
I'll try to help out, here.
Christer Solskogen: I think the reason that is so very important to
Wojciech Puchar is the fact that he is incapable of imagining:
1. other concerns that might apply
2. that things appear highly likely to change
3. that a negligible performance
FreeBSD 9 (x86_64).
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I have googled assiduously and found nothing
useful.
I have installed Flash, following the instructions in the handbook.
Flash is adobe product and they don't provide binaries for FreeBSD, at
least they didn't.
if you really need flash, you may
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:22 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You
i don't talk that case, but if i am hired to write some part of program as
an employer in software company.
Sorry, I misread the situation.
In this case I assume that
21.06.2012 02:26, Wojciech Puchar пишет:
the answer.
I'll try to help out, here.
Christer Solskogen: I think the reason that is so very important to
Wojciech Puchar is the fact that he is incapable of imagining:
1. other concerns that might apply
2. that things appear highly likely to
$uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3
07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
$sudo sysctl -w hw.snd.verbose=2
$cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386)
Installed devices:
pcm0:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, sw2wolf czsq...@163.com wrote:
pci1: multimedia, audio at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
Hi Polytropon, cc questions@
(No CC Wojciech P. as my local filters drop text from him )
To translate this to a programmer's job:
You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You
deliver the program. That's what you are paid for. Still
the source code is yours (as _you_ are the
List,
Sorry for the off-topic post. There are a lot of technically adept people on
this list, so I thought I'd try my luck here:
I want to get started programming for hardware. Motors, sensors, actuators, etc.
I have a programming background, (python, PHP, C++) but no experience with code
that
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 20 17:37:45 2012
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:33:35 +0200
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de.r-bonomi.com
To: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
Antonio Olivares
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:31:02 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
FreeBSD 9 (x86_64).
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I have googled assiduously and found
nothing useful.
I have installed Flash, following the instructions in the handbook.
Flash is adobe product and they don't provide binaries for
On 06/20/2012 06:54 PM, Modulok wrote:
Even general pointers to books/websites would be great. Once I know what it's
called I can google much more effectively
Mars rover is robotic/embedded.
I am using this site myself.
http://www.societyofrobots.com/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthias Gamsjager mgamsja...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Lynn Steven Killingsworth
blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seem to have generated much comment.
I suspect you are thinking as I do that if your servers don't
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Lynn Steven Killingsworth
blue.seahorse.syndic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi FreeBSD -
I have an AMD HD 7950 video card so I am trying to install the latest
FreeBSD xorg available (7.5.2) for an updated driver.
When I start make the install immediately stops at
2012-06-18 20:27, David Demelier skrev:
On 15/06/2012 13:25, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2012-06-15 10:06, David Demelier wrote:
On 15/06/2012 05:43, Edward M wrote:
On 06/14/2012 09:03 AM, David Demelier wrote:
I have an old SB Live! card with a 5.1 speaker set, but i can't get
sound from
2012-06-21 03:54, Modulok skrev:
List,
Sorry for the off-topic post. There are a lot of technically adept people on
this list, so I thought I'd try my luck here:
I want to get started programming for hardware. Motors, sensors, actuators, etc.
I have a programming background, (python, PHP, C++)
99 matches
Mail list logo
