On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:53:25PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> Forgive me if this is off-topic.
> How could I force a packet to go out through an interface,
> despite the default route?
You have a couple of options.
Look at CARP in 5.4, that might do what you want best.
man 4 carp
Also google fo
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Murat Bicer wrote:
> Is there anything that limits us from using ipfilter on top of this ipfw
> b/w control?
Darren Reed, the owner of IPF is probably in the best position to answer
that question. I posed it a week ot two ago on the ipf mailing list.. I'm
waiting for a reply,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, randall ehren wrote:
> > Darren could you answer this question please?
> > Maybe we could get Phil to add the answer to the FAQ.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=ipfilter+ipfw+together
> --> http://false.net/ipfilter/2000_02/0407.html
This is what we settled with eventually
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, randall ehren wrote:
> not to stray too far, but if IPFW is set to allow all incoming packets and is
> only used for shaping, and you have ipfilter handling nat, then it seems it
> would just be:
> network card --> IPFW (traffic shape) --> IPF (filter+nat) --> userland
> i gu
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Eric Timme wrote:
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a89M44M37M54%1535 9983 13% /
> /dev/ad0s1e79M 4.0K72M 0% 2 102360% /tmp
> /dev/ad0s1f 886M 620M 195M76% 107214
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, master wrote:
> Hi all i have a little problem with ipfw
> i have try the following command :
> ipfw add 100 pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.5 to any
> and i have no more network then i try a ping and get
> ping : sendto : No buffer space invalide
> any idea how can i fix this?
Yes,
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Andrew Friedley wrote:
> I'm new to freebsd, coming from linux.
> In linux I use a 1600x1200 framebuffer console, is it possible to set up
> something like this in freebsd? I am not talking about X Windows, but
> increasing the size of the default 80x25 console.
Probably one
Maybe a question for freebsd-hackers.. not sure..
FreeBSD 4.4, P166, 128Mb, 3 HD's: ad0, ad1, ad4, as ata0-master,
ata1-master and ata2-master. ata2-master is a Promise ata 100 controller
(tx2 I think).
For several months my server has been panicing, and I'm starting to think
it's a bad harddrive
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Jett Tayer wrote:
> try cvsup'ng again. re "make your world/kernel"
> and see the results
> hope it will be fine...
I had been having the problem for several months prior to that last cvsup
I did. I don't think (looking back over the commit data) that canything's
changed that
Thre are utilities availible for Windows/DOS that allow you to get the
BIOS and chipset versions etc from a command prompt. Some of these are
written by the BIOS manufacturers or motherboard manufacturers but most
are third party freeware jobs.
Is anythign similar availible for FreeBSD? I have a s
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
> > Then don't enable one. A badly configured firewall is arguably worse
> > than no firewall at all.
> wow no firewall is such a nice idea.
> just kidding.. your server is then open to anyone.
E..
The only real benefits you get from a firewall ar
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
> > I would advice doing a test installation of FreeBSD (see
> > www.freebsd.org/handbook) and having a go at installing the packages you
> > need.
> > What do you think?
>
> I already tried to make my own server but there were to many problem
> for not
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
> The first thing I said is "I have a server at home which is SME and it is a
> distribution that stand on one CD and it can install a full server
> (IMAP,POP,SMTP,DNS,HTTP,FTP,SSH,) in 10-12 minutes .. Then you have a web
> interface to configure y
> > E..
> > The only real benefits you get from a firewall are:
> > 1) controlling which IP addresses can access a service
> > 2) *maybe* bandwidth shaping. *maybe*.
> > 3) packet re-writing.
>
> That's all ?
That's all really!
> I thought the firewall was THE thing to have when you have a se
I' asking here because I don't think the top an page is discriptive neough
for people who 'just don't get it' ;)
I understand that Inact memory is memory that has been requested by
processes but not in use. Is this correct?
I don't understand however, what Buf and Wired memory is used for. How
ma
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I use TightVNC instead of vmware. Works quite fine, and it's almost
> free (GPL).
> As for office software: all my attempts to use various incarnations
> ended in disasters:
[snip]
> so, my advice would be: vmware or vnc.
www.rea
Well, I know BINd8 ships with FreeBSD, but I wanted to install BIND9.
So I installed the port.
Unfortuantely it didn't tell me where it expects the namedb dir to be, it
didn't put a startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d like other ports do..
Is this normal?
Should I just create my own and wing it
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Doug Reynolds wrote:
> Does anyone know of any really good faqs to setup imp3 webmail with
> apache?
The Stable branch comes with fairly good install instuctions. It tells you
what you need to install before you install IMP. What's the problem?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
This is getting quiet frustrating :-)
I don't want to use X, because I like to use my lovely console :)
Plus I'm only on a P233.
I've compiled SC_PIXEL_MODE into my kernel, which means I can use
vidcontrol to set the resolution to 800x600.
Fantastic!
Well, almost. When this happens, my video refr
What kind of memory footprint reduction / speed increase can I expect if I
compile with the -fomit-frame-pointer option?
I already compile all of my ports with:
-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math -march=pentium
... but I'me hearing mixed views about -fomit-frame-pointer. I understand
I won't b
f security.
I just don't want it to bind to that interface :-)
--
Avleen Vig "Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys"
Systems A
21 matches
Mail list logo
