In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan Strick writes:
>You can't unmount the root file system. Even the mere notion makes
>me feel a little queasy.
There is an explicit test in the kernel that stops you from unmounting
the root file system, I guess as an anti foot shooting measure. If
you disable th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erin S
harmahd writes:
>I'm a bit of a newbie, but I've done a good bit of research, and some
>asking around on this issue, and haven't been able to resolve it yet.=20
>I'm using FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE with the GENERIC kernel. (from what i
>can tell, it has all of the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erin
Sharmahd writes:
>Will this help, even though I can't mount any usb thumb drives or
>anything like that?
It's definitely worth a try. People have reported exactly this issue
with both recent iPods, and PNY Attache devices. In the case of the
iPods, removing th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= wr
ites:
>I had my scanner, Epson 2480, working half a year ago on FBSD 6.0, now
>it's been a while since I used it, I have upgraded to FBSD 6.1-PREREL as
>well as upgrading applications, and now it doesn't work.
Sorry about the br
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Ericks
on writes:
>I've been having this problem for quite a whlie but it's never bothered me
>too much until I had some free time on my hand to look into it. Is there
>any kernel parameter that could be truncating my dmesg buffer. Dmesg only
>seems to have 1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Thomas
writes:
>I've got an older Dell Latitude (CPi) laptop that I'm trying to
>setup as a router/firewall/??? machine. I'm using 5.1-R with a
>compiled kernel that I'm slowly reducing to the minimum I need.
>
>I decided to try using usb ethernet adapters s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Mike, I'll pay back your effort in replying to this long thing by
>working up a patch for the "disklabel" manpage (at least) and, if you
>want, I'll CC you so you can veto things you don't like. I do worry
At the risk of adding to the con
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>/boot/boot0 has the FreeBSD bootloader. The installer also offers
>to use the "standard" /boot/mbr.
>Roughly speaking. /boot/boot2 is 15 sectors; I suppose the first
>(all zeros) is replaced with the disklabel, loosely speaking.
>One su
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Hartmann,
O." writes:
>I can see the X-Terminals and other diskless systems booting but when
>mounting / via NFS from the boot host, they get stuck. It seems that they
>can not mount the NFS file system, but that is not the problem.
>I exported then the root tree
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Weimann writes:
>I am using on a web filter ( dansguardian.org ) and am having
>problems on FreeBSD (4.5-STABLE). The filter runs fine for
>about 20 minutes or so then can't seem to come up with the
>right ip addresses for any client machines.
>
>After
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Ptacek writes:
>I had a process whose state under top was listed as devbuf.
>This process seemed to be stuck and I was unable to kill it.
>I ended up rebooting the box to reset it.
>
>None of the man pages (TOP, PS) list the devbuf state.
>What is it and wha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Senthil writes:
>Hi,
>We are using FreeBSD in our organization as a NFS Server. Latest, we
>have developed a NFS client on Windows, we are facing some problem with
>NFSRead on Version 3. Basically we request for reading some size of
>bytes, (which is the read Maxi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Saunders w
rites:
>I have one issue I haven't been able to figure out yet. I'm using a USB
>keyboard with a USB KVM switch. When the machine boots, the keyboard is
>recognized and works fine. (The keyboard doesn't seem to have any
>effect at the "Hit [enter]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Saunders w
rites:
>> device "Keyboard"
>> devname "ukbd0"
>> attach "kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbd0 < /dev/ttyv0"
>
>I added this and tried it with and without the kbdcontrol line in
>/etc/rc.i386. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to make any difference. It
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joh
n Mills writes:
>'startx' still proceeds until it fills all available memory. In
>particular, 'top' shows the size of 'xclock' growing while other processes
>seem OK.
...
>2) Does this [mis]behavior sound familiar to anyone?
I've seen this before when the "fon
15 matches
Mail list logo
