-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forgive me if this is the wrong forum, but Google has left me
emptyhanded...
I am running a webserver with several name-based virtual hosts. I would
like to log, but not limit, the outgoing bandwidth used by each virtual
host. Can someone point me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 05:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
However, you can simply put TransferLog, ErrorLog and/or CustomLog
directives into each of your VirtualHost/VirtualHost sections in
your httpd.conf to generate virtual host specific log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I must admit I feel silly having to ask, but I've been banging my head
against this for a couple days now and I am completely stumped.
I just recently switched from Slackware Linux 8.0 to FreeBSD. There are
a couple of scripts I use for my own
?
Paul Lathrop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE+bXczlos2supvBQwRApNCAJ4hBh/IW04wPaNl/dYQ97elF2OzIwCfecdP
Twx+Q8robLPf47PCbCsn0HU=
=HKrj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
When one does not know Perl, one uses C programs, I suppose. They
are real binaries, and can be suid. It works.
Just mind your security...
:-) I'll second that. I'm just shuddering at the
Greetings,
I would like to create an iso image of a data cd. I started by
following the directions from the FreeBSD Handbook (section 12.5) and
ran the command:
dd if=/dev/acd1c of=freebsd_disk1_backup.iso bs=2048
(acd1 is my CD-ROM drive) After about 210MB had copied, I got the
following
Greetings,
I would like to create an iso image of a data cd. I started by
following the directions from the FreeBSD Handbook (section 12.5) and
ran the command:
dd if=/dev/acd1c of=freebsd_disk1_backup.iso bs=2048
(acd1 is my CD-ROM drive) After about 210MB had copied, I got the
following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I recently configured the mail server I administrate to do SMTP
Authentication using sasl. sasl is configured to use PAM for
authentication, and the smtp PAM service calls pam_mysql. I know it's
rather convoluted, but it's the only solution that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you install SASL from the package or from the port? IIRC, the
package is compiled with Kerberos support.
- jim
I installed from the ports collection, but used just the default
configuration.
I have looked all through my Postfix config files
some advice.
Regards,
Paul Lathrop
Systems Administrator
SquareTrade, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'd suggest asking the Spamassassin mailing lists...
justins wrote:
I`ve installed spamassassin rules on my sentmailserver and i am trying
to filter my mail in order to pick out some spam.
The spamd process is running only it doesn`t add anything to my mail
heather so procmail can`t forward
to a reasonable value.
That's really good to know. Unfortunately, nobody seems to have written
down WHICH tunables need to be adjusted besides the one mentioned above,
nor is there any information on what reasonable value means!
Can anyone point me at a resource for more information on this?
Regards,
Paul
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
That's really good to know. Unfortunately, nobody seems to have written
down WHICH tunables need to be adjusted besides the one mentioned above,
nor is there any information on what reasonable value means!
Can anyone point
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
You should tune the network stack settings towards LAN use (shorter
timeouts, larger send receive buffers); you should probably tune down
the # of vnodes, adjust SysV shared memory as Postgres recommends:
Update your BIOS
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Oh, yes, one more thought-- your specific application, i.e. a large
database, is one where running in 64-bit mode is highly likely to
result in improved performance compared with running the OS in 32-bit
mode. If you've got a AMD64 or EM64T capable CPU, consider installing
Paul Lathrop wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Oh, yes, one more thought-- your specific application, i.e. a large
database, is one where running in 64-bit mode is highly likely to
result in improved performance compared with running the OS in 32-bit
mode. If you've got a AMD64 or EM64T capable CPU
16 matches
Mail list logo