Hello, I hope someone can help me.
I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and would like to use
gdbserver, but I can't find it.
The source tree has gdbserver in two places:
/usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/gdbserver
and
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbserver
There's also a gdb6 in /usr/ports/devel.
The inst
--- Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gdbserver isn't currently ported for FreeBSD. If
> you really need it (as opposed to some other form of
> remote debugging), you could probably best get
started
> by asking obrien for hints.
Thanks for the info Lowell.
What do you mean by "some other form
--- Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Marciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What I want to do is attach gdb from a development
> > machine to a process running on an remote embedded
> > target (stripped binaries, no source). I've only
>
I have a need to remotely debug an application on a
remote FreeBSD-5.4 machine that is devoid of utilities
and source code.
I previously asked a question about gdbserver, but it
looks like it's not available so I'll ask the more
general question.
I could login in to the remote machine, mount a s
Hi,
On 5.4-RELEASE I'm having problems with my AVB card
reader: I often get "Synchronize Cache" and "CSW Tag"
errors.
Does anyone have a solid recommendation for a USB
Compact Flash card reader?
Thanks,
Paul.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Ya
(originally sent to freebsd-fs, but that looks like a
developer list).
I am running FreeBSD-5.4 with root on md0.
I am seeing the following problem:
# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted
on
/dev/md0 17370 15810 17299%/
devfs 1 1
I said:
> # mount /dev/ad0s1a /flash
> # : > /flash/foobar
> # umount /flash
> umount: unmount of /flash failed: Device busy
Then I said:
> No processes are camping on the mount point.
I didn't realize /bin/sh doesn't close the fd.
Man, I feel so dumb.
Paul.
_
Hello. I read a while back about someone working on
supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only the
active kernel pages to the dump device as opposed to
all physical memory - for machines where the phys mem
is greater than the dump dev space.)
Does anyone know the status of that project?
--- Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 12:47 pm, Paul Marciano
> wrote:
> > Hello. I read a while back about someone working
> on
> > supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only
> the
> > active kernel pages to the dump dev
I wonder if someone can help me.
I want to run my 5.4-RELEASE system with a serial
console and muted cons. My /boot.config is:
-h -m
The system loads the kernel but during startup the PC
resets. No messages, just a reset.
If I use -h by itself it is fine.
If I use -m by itself it similarly
I have a general question on the status of USB to
serial support in FreeBSD (specifically the ucom and
ftdi drivers).
I need an extra serial port on my system and for
reasons outside the scope of this email I can't just
plug in a PCI card. I'm trying to use USB, but it
seems that ucom is broken
--- Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I've got a handful of such devices that appear
> to work just fine.
> Now, mine are based on the Prolific PL-2303* chips
> but you don't mention
> any specific hardware. All I know is that I'm using
> them for consoles
> (and am running getty on
--- "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You asked for honesty, and I'll give you some more:
> You are being a jerk and acting like you are
> entitled to having your particular
> problem fixed without pitching in and helping in
> some way.
You're funny... but actually I was only asking f
Hi.
The man page for bus_dma_map_create() says this about
the "nsegments" parameter:
Number of discontinuities (scatter/gather seg-
ments) allowed in a DMA mapped region. If there
is no restriction, BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED may be
specified.
BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED is #defined as (~0).
Then, in
Hello.
I am running FreeBSD-5.4 on a 3GHz P4 with two Intel
fxp NICs running IP forwarding with polling enabled.
For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am getting
100Mbps throughput port to port.
For min-size packets (64 bytes) I am only seeing
around 60Mbps. Increasing HZ and the polling
parame
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You couldn't do 100Mb/s with em on a 100Mb/s line
> with min packets, because there are gaps between
> packets so its impossible.
Thanks for the detailed reply Danial.
By 100Mbps I mean line-rate: 148809 packets/sec for
64-byte Ethernet frames + IPG an
16 matches
Mail list logo
