If you nor any of the FreeBSD developers know about the 75xx series of
chipsets, then I guess that explains why the score is Linux 87, FreeBSD 2. and
getting worse by the day. Nicely done. What are you developing on, gaming
machines? Why have you trashed the OS to strengthen SMP computing when
In a message dated 1/7/05 4:50:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with
5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers.
Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps
going into
I find in amazing that a discussion of how FreeBSD 5.3 sucks compared to 4.x
can segue into an discussion of FreeBSD vs Windows. I guess thats the politics
of computing. And also a commentary on the mentality of the kind of person
that uses FreeBSD.
Your point doesn't address the lack of support for major chipsets, so that
users can utilitize the latest fast processors available. The point is that
those using 4.x because of its performance advantages, cannot use it with the
latest processors because the MBs don't work in 4.x. THAT is the
In a message dated 1/11/05 9:50:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Friend,
Let me start by introducing myself. I am Mr. Wang Qin
Credit officer of the Hang Seng Bank Ltd. I have a
Concealed business suggestion for you.
Before the U.S and Iraqi war, our client General.
Mr Watson,
As you are listed as the leader of the FreeBSD foundation, and you seem to be
the
only one willing to admit that FreeBSD 5.3 is not yet up to the performance
of 4.x,
doesn't in concern you that:
1) Freebsd 4.x is not being supported as a production O/S, and the support
is
ending
Neither the 5.3 nor 4.10 hardware notes mention te 82546GB chip, however
there seems to be snippets of code that reference it. Is it supported? If so,
what
version of FreeBSD first supported it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
In a message dated 1/5/05 12:23:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support
bad slow version and not good one. Very stupid people.
FreeBSD is more organized and managed more professionally compared to many
of the Linux
In a message dated 1/5/05 1:20:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Linux also doesnt do a major release until its arguably better than the
previous version. Another lesson that the FreeBSD camp could well learn
from. You do
your tweaking in the confines of your labs, not at
In a message dated 1/5/05 2:39:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you treat your
users? Why can't your developer use the machine they used to make 5.3 work?
Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support
In a message dated 1/5/05 1:53:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with
someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 or
email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks.
---
So
In a message dated 1/5/05 3:00:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Asking a guy from a poor country to donate his hardware to a
US organization at least partially funded by Yahoo is helpful? What
planet
are you from?
The planet where 99% of the posts on this list are
In a message dated 1/5/05 4:03:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Besides ... with a name like hardcodeharry, I would expect a little more
intelligence; a little more willingness to dig into things. A slight
tendency to ask the question: how can I hack this code to work,
In a message dated 1/5/05 3:59:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Rather, it was the people who *developed* the *free* and very powerful
operating system (that he is attempting to use) he called stupid. I'm
still waiting to see him post an apology.
I, for one, am humbled by
In a message dated 1/5/05 6:29:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Whine, whine, whine, bitch, bitch, bitch.
You aren't technically capable of grasping a single point in this discussion,
Tom,
so why are you even trying?
In a message dated 1/4/05 11:50:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd
4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others.
They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works
ok, but a
In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why are you here?
I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you
were born with an advantage in that are
He has a Holy Mission.
Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support
In a message dated 1/6/05 1:44:54 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you
treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they
used to make 5.3 work?
YOU are not PAYING the FreeBSD developers to develop
In a message dated 1/5/05 7:39:02 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your point might have some teeth if the newer version were better, but
the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the
issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an old version. Its the
In a message dated 1/5/05 7:25:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why are you here?
I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you
were born with an
In a message dated 1/6/05 4:51:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
4.10 *is* supported, and 5.3 works as advertised - what the hell is your
*problem* exactly???
Its been well documented that 5.3 does NOT work as advertised, and the
newest intel chipsets (not that new) don't
In a message dated 1/6/05 2:10:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you really have no contacts at SM or Dell? What kind of a development
org has no contacts with major vendors?
It's not a question of not having contacts. It's a question of
actually defining the problem
The moment you start paying for development and support I'll agree with
you.
Getting an incompetent like you to agree with me is so far from important
that
I can't help but smile about the thought of it
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
23 matches
Mail list logo
