turday, July 14, 2007 4:54 PM
To: Sten Daniel Soersdal; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems
They probably did it because the number of subscribers
has increased to the point that they need to start
limiting bandwidth to ensure that everyon
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of L Goodwin
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 4:54 PM
To: Sten Daniel Soersdal; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems
They probably did it because the number of subscribers
has increased to the
They probably did it because the number of subscribers
has increased to the point that they need to start
limiting bandwidth to ensure that everyone gets their
fair share. They probably allowed subscribers to
exceed their allotted max bandwidth while the number
of subscribers was sufficiently low t
fbsd2 wrote:
Comclark cable in Angeles City Philippines has changed
from using 100Mbps Cable Modem to 10Mbps Cable Modem.
To me this seems to be all wrong as all I see is slower response.
Is there any technical or performance reason for any cable internet
provider to downgrade their network sub
On Thursday 12 July 2007, David Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:21:50AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
> > Am I missing some thing here?
> > I though 10Mbps/100Mbps ends up controlling the
> > max packet size traveling over the internet.
>
> Yes, you are missing something.
>
> > So if your using 10M
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:21:50AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
> Am I missing some thing here?
> I though 10Mbps/100Mbps ends up controlling the
> max packet size traveling over the internet.
Yes, you are missing something.
> So if your using 10Mbps, you end up generating 10 separate packets
> versus 1
Am I missing some thing here?
I though 10Mbps/100Mbps ends up controlling the
max packet size traveling over the internet.
So if your using 10Mbps, you end up generating 10 separate
packets versus 1 packet at 100Mbps to move the same amount of data.
This results in a network using 10Mbps to have
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:27:08PM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
> Sure they have more than 10Mbps bandwidth.
> People who became subscribers during the first 4 years
> they were in business all got 100Mbps modems.
>
> As I see it, down grading to obsolete 10Mbps modems
> is degrading overall network per
Hello:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fbsd2
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: Jeff Mohler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
> Subject: RE: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems
>
&g
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Mohler
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems
Do you have more than 10Mbit/sec of cable internet bandwidth available?
I dont see it as a problem if you dont, but if
Do you have more than 10Mbit/sec of cable internet bandwidth available?
I dont see it as a problem if you dont, but if you have 20Mbit/sec of
internet, then ya..
If it saves then $5 a unit, for 10,000 units, no harm.
On 7/11/07, fbsd2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comclark cable in Angeles City
Comclark cable in Angeles City Philippines has changed
from using 100Mbps Cable Modem to 10Mbps Cable Modem.
To me this seems to be all wrong as all I see is slower response.
Is there any technical or performance reason for any cable internet
provider to downgrade their network subscribers cable
12 matches
Mail list logo
