Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-18 Thread Georg Reilinger
-- Excuse me... you're joking, right? I assume you have a plentycore
-- processor with Gigs of RAM, and already two shells show a problem?
-- That sounds totally wrong.

Is that sarcasm or irony?





 Von: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
An: Georg Reilinger georgreilin...@yahoo.de 
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 
Gesendet: 5:24 Freitag, 18.Januar 2013
Betreff: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD
 
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT), Georg Reilinger wrote:
 As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. 

As for other desktop environments, yes.



 Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in 
 assuming this?

I think KDE 3 is still in ports, but will be scheduled for removal,
as KDE 4 is the place where development takes place, and there seems
to be no active development on KDE 3 that can be built (!) on FreeBSD
due to lack of contribution.



 I am currently running a live version of FreeBSD 8.2 with KDE 4.8.

May I ask which live system this is?



 The thing 
 here is, that KDE 4 is simply too heavy for my system. For example: it is 
 impossible for me to have two open shells at the same time. Once I exit a 
 given shell, I can't open another one due to a lack of resources, even after 
 having 
 turned off all the extra stuff - plasma desktop, nepomuk...

Excuse me... you're joking, right? I assume you have a plentycore
processor with Gigs of RAM, and already two shells show a problem?
That sounds totally wrong.

When you play a music file and move the window, do you get skipping
audio, too?

Just scary...



 As a consequence, I can see myself do two possible things, to have a system 
 running with KDE 3.5 once again:
 
 1. Go back to an older release of FreeBSD and install KDE 3.5 from the 
 precompiled binaries that are on the DVD donwload version.
 Judging by the release announcements, this should be 7.1.

Yes, this will work. But note that you are running an OS that
has been gone out of support, so you probably won't be able
to install newer software using ports or packages. However,
you can use the system as is, and even use ports as long 
as the distfiles are still kept available online.



 2. To be honest, I am quite happy with 8.2 and I would like to keep it for 
 some time to come. In other words, is there a way to keep 8.2 and still 
 have KDE 3.5 along with it? For example has anyone ever tried to 
 install a 7.1 pre-built package (KDE 3.5 in this case) on an 8.2 system? 
 Is that be possible?

That should be possible if you install the required compat7x
port on the system. Keep an eye on dependencies and make sure
you won't be shooting your feet. A good start would be to
install the KDE stuff on a clean system (right after compat7x)
so there won't be much confusion.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-18 Thread RW
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT)
Georg Reilinger wrote:


 As a consequence, I can see myself do two possible things, to have a
 system 
 
 running with KDE 3.5 once again:
 
 1. Go back to an older release of FreeBSD and install KDE 3.5 from
 the 
 
that's pointless

 2. To be honest, I am quite happy with 8.2 and I would like to keep
 it for some time to come. In other words, is there a way to keep 8.2
 and still have KDE 3.5 along with it? For example has anyone ever
 tried to install a 7.1 pre-built package (KDE 3.5 in this case) on an
 8.2 system? Is that be possible?

You can carry on using 3.5 on any current release. The problem is when
it's eventually removed from ports, updating  other ports may result in
dependency problems. 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-18 Thread Mike Clarke

On Friday 18 January 2013 16:58:11 RW wrote:
 You can carry on using 3.5 on any current release. The problem is when
 it's eventually removed from ports, updating  other ports may result in
 dependency problems.

I'm already starting to experience some problems which I assume are due to 
incompatibility with some recently upgraded dependencies and I've finally, and 
somewhat reluctantly, switched to KDE 4.8. It's certainly more bloated than 
3.5 but after getting rid of some unwanted eye candy it's not as bad as I 
expected, certainly better than last time I tried it out about a year ago. The 
most noticeable deterioration in performance is that it's much slower to start 
up than 3.5 was and kmail takes much longer to open a mail folder than it 
used to.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Reilinger
Hi everybody,


My issue is the following:

As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. 

Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in 

assuming this?


I am currently running a live version of FreeBSD 8.2 with KDE 4.8. The thing 

here is, that KDE 4 is simply too heavy for my system. For example: it is 

impossible for me to have two open shells at the same time. Once I exit a 

given shell, I can't open another one due to a lack of resources, even after 
having 

turned off all the extra stuff - plasma desktop, nepomuk...

As a consequence, I can see myself do two possible things, to have a system 

running with KDE 3.5 once again:

1. Go back to an older release of FreeBSD and install KDE 3.5 from the 

precompiled binaries that are on the DVD donwload version.
Judging by the release announcements, this should be 7.1.

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html

This is something that I don't really feel like doing.

2. To be honest, I am quite happy with 8.2 and I would like to keep it for 
some time to come. In other words, is there a way to keep 8.2 and still 
have KDE 3.5 along with it? For example has anyone ever tried to 
install a 7.1 pre-built package (KDE 3.5 in this case) on an 8.2 system? 
Is that be possible?


Any other solutions?


Many thanks
Georg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Some decisions from upstream are a PITA. I'm from Linux, it's more  
up-to-date than FreeBSD. On Linux I switched from KDE 3 to GNOME 2, when  
KDE 4 was introduced and from GNOME 2 to Xfce, when GNOME 3 was  
introduced. There are forks of GNOME 2, but I guess there's no fork of KDE  
3. Some users claim that it should be possible to set up KDE 4, that it  
become equal to KDE 3. I doubt that. Another issue are hard dependencies,  
such as the dependency to the buggy pulseaudio. You better get rid of KDE  
and start to accustom to another DE.


2 Cents,
Ralf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Reilinger





 Von: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com
An: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 
Gesendet: 2:37 Freitag, 18.Januar 2013
Betreff: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD 
 
-- Some decisions from upstream are a PITA. I'm from Linux, it's more 
up-to-date than FreeBSD. On Linux I switched from KDE 3 to GNOME 2, when KDE 4 
was introduced and from GNOME 2 to Xfce, when GNOME 3 was introduced.

I have tried both, GNOME and Xfce. Found both to be kinda yuckie. Not really 
feeling at home here.


-- There are forks of GNOME 2, but I guess there's no fork of KDE 3. 

Actually there is. It is called Trinity: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/ , but I 
don't know, if it is currently supported on FreeBSD.
If not, may be a reason, to become a porter!

-- Some users claim that it should be possible to set up KDE 4, that it become 
equal to KDE 3. I doubt that. 

I highly and holily second that. I have heard quite a few people complain about 
KDE 4's heavy hunger for resources.

-- Another issue are hard dependencies, such as the dependency to the buggy 
pulseaudio. You better get rid of KDE and start to accustom to another DE.

This would be my very last option. As you can see, I am still working on a go 
around here.


2 Cents,
Ralf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Mike Jeays


On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT)
Georg Reilinger georgreilin...@yahoo.de wrote:

 Hi everybody,
 
 
 My issue is the following:
 
 As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. 
 
 Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in 
 
 assuming this?
 
 
 I am currently running a live version of FreeBSD 8.2 with KDE 4.8. The thing 
 
 here is, that KDE 4 is simply too heavy for my system. For example: it is 
 
 impossible for me to have two open shells at the same time. Once I exit a 
 
 given shell, I can't open another one due to a lack of resources, even after 
 having 
 
 turned off all the extra stuff - plasma desktop, nepomuk...
 
 As a consequence, I can see myself do two possible things, to have a system 
 
 running with KDE 3.5 once again:
 
 1. Go back to an older release of FreeBSD and install KDE 3.5 from the 
 
 precompiled binaries that are on the DVD donwload version.
 Judging by the release announcements, this should be 7.1.
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html
 
 This is something that I don't really feel like doing.
 
 2. To be honest, I am quite happy with 8.2 and I would like to keep it for 
 some time to come. In other words, is there a way to keep 8.2 and still 
 have KDE 3.5 along with it? For example has anyone ever tried to 
 install a 7.1 pre-built package (KDE 3.5 in this case) on an 8.2 system? 
 Is that be possible?
 
 
 Any other solutions?
 
 
 Many thanks
 Georg
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


I run xfce4 with FreeBSD 9.0 on an old Pentium 4 with 1.5 GB, and it works 
well. Resource
requirements are much less than the latest KDE, and Unity is even more 
unworkable.
KDE and Gnome have got very bloated in the last few years, IMHO and less 
intuitive.
They seem to be going backwards. The multiple desktop feature is one of the main
things that set Unix-style desktops way ahead of Windows, and now they have 
become
harder to use.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:06:15 +0100, Georg Reilinger  
georgreilin...@yahoo.de wrote:

http://www.trinitydesktop.org/


Oops, I've forgotten that there is that fork. However, I suspect that KDE  
and GNOME forks will suffer from Qt and GTK dependencies, resp. the  
manpower (coders and user base, aka testers) to maintain the forks. A lot  
of people don't like that DEs do look like and behave similar as DEs for  
tablet PCs do, so in the near future, those forks might become more  
important. OTOH KDE 4 still is a classic DE and not one of those tablet PC  
like DEs.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.2 with pre-built KDE 3.5 package from FreeBSD 7.1 DVD

2013-01-17 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:25:03 + (GMT), Georg Reilinger wrote:
 As far as I know, FreeBSD has completely dropped support for KDE 3.5. 

As for other desktop environments, yes.



 Whether it's the ports, or the pkg_add precompiled binaries. Am I right in 
 assuming this?

I think KDE 3 is still in ports, but will be scheduled for removal,
as KDE 4 is the place where development takes place, and there seems
to be no active development on KDE 3 that can be built (!) on FreeBSD
due to lack of contribution.



 I am currently running a live version of FreeBSD 8.2 with KDE 4.8.

May I ask which live system this is?



 The thing 
 here is, that KDE 4 is simply too heavy for my system. For example: it is 
 impossible for me to have two open shells at the same time. Once I exit a 
 given shell, I can't open another one due to a lack of resources, even after 
 having 
 turned off all the extra stuff - plasma desktop, nepomuk...

Excuse me... you're joking, right? I assume you have a plentycore
processor with Gigs of RAM, and already two shells show a problem?
That sounds totally wrong.

When you play a music file and move the window, do you get skipping
audio, too?

Just scary...



 As a consequence, I can see myself do two possible things, to have a system 
 running with KDE 3.5 once again:
 
 1. Go back to an older release of FreeBSD and install KDE 3.5 from the 
 precompiled binaries that are on the DVD donwload version.
 Judging by the release announcements, this should be 7.1.

Yes, this will work. But note that you are running an OS that
has been gone out of support, so you probably won't be able
to install newer software using ports or packages. However,
you can use the system as is, and even use ports as long 
as the distfiles are still kept available online.



 2. To be honest, I am quite happy with 8.2 and I would like to keep it for 
 some time to come. In other words, is there a way to keep 8.2 and still 
 have KDE 3.5 along with it? For example has anyone ever tried to 
 install a 7.1 pre-built package (KDE 3.5 in this case) on an 8.2 system? 
 Is that be possible?

That should be possible if you install the required compat7x
port on the system. Keep an eye on dependencies and make sure
you won't be shooting your feet. A good start would be to
install the KDE stuff on a clean system (right after compat7x)
so there won't be much confusion.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[dvd+rw-tools-7.1] Failure to burn disks: SK=5h/INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE

2012-01-28 Thread Yuri
While burning the DVD+R DL with the command 'growisofs -dvd-compat 
-speed=4 -Z /dev/cd0=$1' on 9.0-STABLE I am getting this error:

 8333492224/8407351452 (99.1%) @4.0x, remaining 0:14 RBU 100.0% UBU  57.1%
 8352301056/8407351452 (99.3%) @4.1x, remaining 0:10 RBU 100.0% UBU  53.1%
 8371240960/8407351452 (99.6%) @4.1x, remaining 0:06 RBU 100.0% UBU  55.1%
 8387395584/8407351452 (99.8%) @3.5x, remaining 0:03 RBU  59.6% UBU  53.1%
 8406237184/8407351452 (100.0%) @4.1x, remaining 0:00 RBU   3.4% UBU  61.2%
:-[ WRITE@LBA=3ea3c0h failed with SK=5h/INVALID ADDRESS FOR WRITE]: 
Invalid argument

:-( write failed: Invalid argument

It failed 3 times.
Size of the iso image is 8407351452.

Device is:  cd0: PIONEER DVD-RW  DVR-112D 1.21 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 
device


I did burn DVDs successfully using the same drive, the same batch of 
empty writable DVDs and the same command on 8.X. I am not sure if this 
is because of 9.0 or because of this specific disk image.


Do you know what may be a problem? Do you burn DVDs successfully?

Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Upgrading 7.1 to 7.3, use 7.2 as a safe step?

2011-02-27 Thread Nerius Landys
My upgrades were a success.  I upgraded 3 machines:

1.  7.1 - 7.4
2.  8.0 - 8.1
3.  7.1 - 7.3 - 7.4

I don't use STABLE, but rather e.g. RELENG_7_4
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Upgrading 7.1 to 7.3, use 7.2 as a safe step?

2011-02-25 Thread Nerius Landys
For me, time can be spared, but errors should be avoided at all costs.
I have upgraded FreeBSD before, for example 7.0 - 7.1.  I use the
buildworld/buildkernel procedure.
I now have a 7.1 system.  Should I upgrade to 7.2 and then to 7.3, or
is it safe to go directly from 7.1 to 7.3?

- Nerius

P.S. I will also be upgrading 8.0 to 8.2 on another system, and assume
the answer you give can be applied there as well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Upgrading 7.1 to 7.3, use 7.2 as a safe step?

2011-02-25 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Nerius Landys wrote:
 For me, time can be spared, but errors should be avoided at all costs.
 I have upgraded FreeBSD before, for example 7.0 - 7.1.  I use the
 buildworld/buildkernel procedure.
 I now have a 7.1 system.  Should I upgrade to 7.2 and then to 7.3, or
 is it safe to go directly from 7.1 to 7.3?

You shouldn't run into any unusual issues.  Note that more care is needed if 
you are doing a major version bump-- ie, you should go to 7.4 - 8.0 - 8.2.

Regards,
-- 
-Chuck

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Upgrading 7.1 to 7.3, use 7.2 as a safe step?

2011-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On February 25, 2011 1:39:47 PM -0800 Nerius Landys nlan...@gmail.com 
wrote:



For me, time can be spared, but errors should be avoided at all costs.
I have upgraded FreeBSD before, for example 7.0 - 7.1.  I use the
buildworld/buildkernel procedure.
I now have a 7.1 system.  Should I upgrade to 7.2 and then to 7.3, or
is it safe to go directly from 7.1 to 7.3?



I have upgraded several times across major versions without any problems. 
(5.x to 6.x, 6.x to 7.x).  Each time I simply changed the supfile to the 
version I wanted to upgrade to, fetched the files and rebuilt world and 
kernel.  After those are complete, I run a portupgrade -a to sync all the 
ports with the new sources.


Note that this is *not* the way to do it if you absolutely must avoid 
problems, however slight the risk.


--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson
There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


snd_hda 7.1 surround sound

2011-02-21 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
Hello list,

I need help configuring snd_hda to produce 7.1 surround sound via the spdif
optical output
My goal is to play a DVD and have 7.1 surround sound passed through to my
stereo (via the optical output on the motherboard)

in a perfect world the optical output would be the default, as I have no
other need to audio output on this system

I am hoping someone has a recipe for this.

below is some basic info:

uname -a
FreeBSD HTPC.PuffyBSD.Com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r216047: Mon
Nov 29 09:40:47 UTC 2010
r...@sam.puffybsd.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
HTPC#


HTPC# cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)
Installed devices:
pcm0: HDA Realtek ALC885 PCM #0 Analog (play/rec) default
pcm1: HDA Realtek ALC885 PCM #1 Analog (play/rec)
pcm2: HDA Realtek ALC885 PCM #2 Digital (play/rec)
pcm3: HDA NVidia MCP73 HDMI PCM #0 Digital (play)
pcm4: HDA ATI R6xx HDMI PCM #0 HDMI (play)



sysctl dev.hdac.0.pindump=1

hdac0: Dumping AFG cad=0 nid=1 pins:
hdac0:  nid 20 0x01014410 as  1 seq  0  Line-out  Jack jack  1 loc  1
color   Green misc 4
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 21 0x01011412 as  1 seq  2  Line-out  Jack jack  1 loc  1
color   Black misc 4
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 22 0x01016411 as  1 seq  1  Line-out  Jack jack  1 loc  1
color  Orange misc 4
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP   Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 23 0x01012414 as  1 seq  4  Line-out  Jack jack  1 loc  1
colorGrey misc 4
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP   Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 24 0x01a19c40 as  4 seq  0   Mic  Jack jack  1 loc  1
colorPink misc 12
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 25 0x02a19c50 as  5 seq  0   Mic  Jack jack  1 loc  2
colorPink misc 12
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 26 0x0181344f as  4 seq 15   Line-in  Jack jack  1 loc  1
colorBlue misc 4
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 27 0x02214c20 as  2 seq  0Headphones  Jack jack  1 loc  2
color   Green misc 12
hdac0:Caps: IN OUT HP  VREF Sense: 0x
hdac0:  nid 28 0x593301f0 as 15 seq  0CD  None jack  3 loc 25
color Unknown misc 1 [DISABLED]
hdac0:Caps: IN
hdac0:  nid 30 0x014b6130 as  3 seq  0 SPDIF-out  Jack jack 11 loc  1
color  Orange misc 1
hdac0:Caps:OUT
hdac0:  nid 31 0x01cb7160 as  6 seq  0  SPDIF-in  Jack jack 11 loc  1
color  Yellow misc 1
hdac0:Caps: IN
hdac0: NumGPIO=2 NumGPO=0 NumGPI=0 GPIWake=0 GPIUnsol=1
hdac0: GPIO: data=0x enable=0x direction=0x
hdac0:   wake=0x  unsol=0xsticky=0x
hdac0: Dumping AFG cad=3 nid=1 pins:
hdac0:  nid 5 0x185601f0 as 15 seq  0   Digital-out  Jack jack  6 loc 24
color Unknown misc 1
hdac0:Caps:OUT  Sense: 0x
hdac0: NumGPIO=0 NumGPO=0 NumGPI=0 GPIWake=0 GPIUnsol=0
HTPC#



-- 

Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
http://www.fourmannetworks.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Why gdb-7.1 doesn't set hardware watchpoints on i7 CPU (amd64)?

2010-12-08 Thread Yuri

All watchpoints are software.
How can I troubleshoot?

Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: strange behaviour on FreeBSD 7.1

2010-11-18 Thread Jonathan Chen
2010/11/18 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru:
 Hi.

 Sometimes system goes to this situation: 0% idle and no processes take CPU 
 time

 #top -SIHP
 last pid: 62813;  load averages:  4.17,  3.64,  2.16   up 28+06:44:02  
 20:41:41
 155 processes: 7 running, 129 sleeping, 19 waiting
 CPU: 99.3% user,  0.0% nice,  0.7% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
 Mem: 177M Active, 27M Inact, 124M Wired, 13M Cache, 60M Buf, 148M Free
 Swap: 2048M Total, 51M Used, 1997M Free, 2% Inuse

  PID USERNAME   PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU COMMAND

 #top
 last pid: 62852;  load averages:  4.10,  3.67,  2.22   up 28+06:44:36  
 20:42:15
 172 processes: 4 running, 168 sleeping
 CPU: 99.6% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
 Mem: 203M Active, 27M Inact, 125M Wired, 13M Cache, 60M Buf, 121M Free
 Swap: 2048M Total, 51M Used, 1997M Free, 2% Inuse

  PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU COMMAND
 62817 root         36  -8    0 29696K 23276K piperd   0:00  7.62% perl5.8.8

If you look at the last pid between the 2 top-output snippets, you
can see that approx 40 processes came and went in-between. This
indiciates that you probably have some script running that's spawning
a large number of short-lived processes.
-- 
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


strange behaviour on FreeBSD 7.1

2010-11-17 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi.

Sometimes system goes to this situation: 0% idle and no processes take CPU time

#top -SIHP
last pid: 62813;  load averages:  4.17,  3.64,  2.16   up 28+06:44:02  20:41:41
155 processes: 7 running, 129 sleeping, 19 waiting
CPU: 99.3% user,  0.0% nice,  0.7% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
Mem: 177M Active, 27M Inact, 124M Wired, 13M Cache, 60M Buf, 148M Free
Swap: 2048M Total, 51M Used, 1997M Free, 2% Inuse

  PID USERNAME   PRI NICE   SIZERES STATETIME   WCPU COMMAND

#top
last pid: 62852;  load averages:  4.10,  3.67,  2.22   up 28+06:44:36  20:42:15
172 processes: 4 running, 168 sleeping
CPU: 99.6% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
Mem: 203M Active, 27M Inact, 125M Wired, 13M Cache, 60M Buf, 121M Free
Swap: 2048M Total, 51M Used, 1997M Free, 2% Inuse

  PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATETIME   WCPU COMMAND
62817 root 36  -80 29696K 23276K piperd   0:00  7.62% perl5.8.8
64644 root  1  440  3532K  1048K select  22:20  0.00% screen
 8862 root  1   80  9192K  2460K nanslp  17:18  0.00% verlihub
 8450 icecast   6   80  8812K  1116K nanslp   5:38  0.00% icecast
  698 root  1  440  3180K   872K select   4:21  0.00% syslogd
61307 root  1  960  6992K  2724K RUN  4:20  0.00% proftpd
61902 root  1  960  6992K  2608K RUN  3:51  0.00% proftpd
 8435 postfix   1   40  6192K   800K kqread   2:40  0.00% qmgr
 8464 root  1   40  3124K   960K kqread   1:34  0.00% dovecot
 8424 root  1   40  5168K   596K kqread   1:26  0.00% master
 8521 root  1  440 18808K  3164K select   1:17  0.00% httpd
 8467 vmail 1   40  4276K   796K kqread   0:48  0.00% dovecot-auth
 8541 root  1  450  5752K   448K select   0:34  0.00% sshd
 8595 root  1  440  3236K   300K select   0:27  0.00% inetd
51383 freeradius1  960 28568K 11408K RUN  0:27  0.00% radiusd
 8314 mysql10   40 47292K  6344K sbwait   0:25  0.00% mysqld
 8216 root  1  440  6992K   612K select   0:23  0.00% proftpd

1 usersLoad  4.07  3.69  2.26  17 ноя 20:42

Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL   VN PAGER   SWAP PAGER
Tot   Share  TotShareFree   in   out in   out
Act  205392   12432   63191640980  137912  count
All  278608   16052  278745257020  pages
Proc:Interrupts
  r   p   d   s   w   Csw  Trp  Sys  Int  Sof  Flt 95 cow2071 total
  4  39 128  5733  306 2386   65  31k  255 76 zfodsio1 irq3
  ozfod   sio0 irq4
 1.2%Sys   0.6%Intr 98.2%User  0.0%Nice  0.0%Idle%ozfod 7 ata0 irq14
|||||||||||   daefr58 rl0 rl4 17
=132 prcfr  2006 cpu0: time
87 dtbuf  186 totfr
Namei Name-cache   Dir-cache 35373 desvn2 react
   Callshits   %hits   % 10855 numvn  pdwak
11231009  90  8152 frevn  pdpgs
  intrn
Disks   ad1127712 wire
KB/t  11.33207692 act
tps   7 27820 inact
MB/s   0.08 13612 cache
%busy 0124300 free

uname -a
FreeBSD i.net.ua 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Jan  3
01:15:39 EET 2009 k...@i.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7  i386


-- 
С уважением,
 Коньков  mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: upgrading form 7.1-RELEASE to 8.0-RELEASE?

2010-06-17 Thread Tom Worster
On 6/16/10 1:06 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:

 On 16/06/2010 17:48:03, Tom Worster wrote:
 as usual i let things slip until the servers are a couple of versions behind
 and then i face the worries of upgrading.
 
 will freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade work on a 7.1-RELEASE system or
 do i need to take intermediate steps?
 
 does anyone have experience or advice they'd be willing to share?
 
 and if all goes well, when i boot 8.0 are my deamons going to start and be
 happy:
 
 Server version: 5.0.87 FreeBSD port: mysql-server-5.0.87
 Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533)
 Server version: Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD)
 PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Nov 20 2009 16:10:58)
 
 Yes, this upgrade should work in one step.  Make sure to install the
 compat7x port, and all the software you installed under 7.1 will be able
 to keep running.
 
 Note however that the compat7x stuff is merely a measure to give
 yourself a breathing space between upgrading the OS and rebuilding all
 your ports.

excellent. i wasn't aware of the port.

would the order to do things be: update ports with portsnap, install
misc/compat7x, upgrade with freebsd-update and reboot?


 You really do have to reinstall all the ports on a major version
 upgrade: while installed ports will still run if you don't touch them,
 as soon as you start updating anything, or installing anything new, it
 will start to go horribly poo unless you haved reinstalled everything.

yes. i plan to upgrade all the apps to the current ports shortly after the
base upgrade.


 I note that the software you're running is all a few versions behind
 what's current, and some of those updates involve pretty significant
 changes (eg. php 5.2 to 5.3; changes to the way apache ports work;

i've already ported the code for 5.3.


 Oracle pushing to drop support for MySQL 5.0) so a bit of forethough and
 planning is advised, but there's no real deal-breaker there.

this has been a vexing concern for some considerable time now. but it's
perhaps out of scope here. if we had better insight into where oracle is
taking it...


 Also, if you wait for a few weeks you could go directly to 8.1-RELEASE,
 which might be a better choice.  There have been some pretty significant
 bugfixes between 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RELEASE.

bug fixes sound nice. a few weeks you say?

thank you for the input, matthew -- much appreciated.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: upgrading form 7.1-RELEASE to 8.0-RELEASE?

2010-06-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 17/06/2010 13:41:43, Tom Worster wrote:
 On 6/16/10 1:06 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk

 would the order to do things be: update ports with portsnap, install
 misc/compat7x, upgrade with freebsd-update and reboot?

You need to be running 8.0 or above before you can install compat7x, so
it's upgrade with freebsd-update, reboot, install compat7x, either
reboot again, or restart any daemons that didn't start first time.

I think.  I'm assuming freebsd-update zaps the 7.x shlibs when you do a
7.x - 8.0 upgrade, BICBW.

 Oracle pushing to drop support for MySQL 5.0) so a bit of forethough and
 planning is advised, but there's no real deal-breaker there.
 
 this has been a vexing concern for some considerable time now. but it's
 perhaps out of scope here. if we had better insight into where oracle is
 taking it...

I think it's pretty clear that Oracle are going to maintain MySQL as a
freely available database product for the foreseeable future.  They are
keen to get as many people as possible onto the current release though,
so 5.0 is being deprecated in favour of 5.1, and 5.5 is rapidly
approaching.  5.1 is pretty much a super-set of 5.0 so you're not likely
to have to do any more than run some regression tests to show your
schema and SQL still works correctly.

 Also, if you wait for a few weeks you could go directly to 8.1-RELEASE,
 which might be a better choice.  There have been some pretty significant
 bugfixes between 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RELEASE.
 
 bug fixes sound nice. a few weeks you say?

Probably more like a month, actually.  The schedule is here:

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/schedule.html

but it's not unusual for the release to be delayed as RE team work on
ensuring it is of the required quality.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwaJcUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxNigCeNis4YIVeOSk21wizLxNSs+g+
LVQAn0xKxdN/G0Fpjewk4+UJvEznPm30
=4FQM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


upgrading form 7.1-RELEASE to 8.0-RELEASE?

2010-06-16 Thread Tom Worster
as usual i let things slip until the servers are a couple of versions behind
and then i face the worries of upgrading.

will freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade work on a 7.1-RELEASE system or
do i need to take intermediate steps?

does anyone have experience or advice they'd be willing to share?

and if all goes well, when i boot 8.0 are my deamons going to start and be
happy:

Server version: 5.0.87 FreeBSD port: mysql-server-5.0.87
Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533)
Server version: Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD)
PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Nov 20 2009 16:10:58) 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: upgrading form 7.1-RELEASE to 8.0-RELEASE?

2010-06-16 Thread Jason

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:48:03PM -0400, Tom Worster thus spake:

as usual i let things slip until the servers are a couple of versions behind
and then i face the worries of upgrading.

will freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade work on a 7.1-RELEASE system or
do i need to take intermediate steps?

does anyone have experience or advice they'd be willing to share?

and if all goes well, when i boot 8.0 are my deamons going to start and be
happy:

Server version: 5.0.87 FreeBSD port: mysql-server-5.0.87
Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533)
Server version: Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD)
PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Nov 20 2009 16:10:58)



http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html 


Instructions for using freebsd-update are found in the announcement, and
what more needs to be done in moving from one release to another major
branch.

-j
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: upgrading form 7.1-RELEASE to 8.0-RELEASE?

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 16/06/2010 17:48:03, Tom Worster wrote:
 as usual i let things slip until the servers are a couple of versions behind
 and then i face the worries of upgrading.
 
 will freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade work on a 7.1-RELEASE system or
 do i need to take intermediate steps?
 
 does anyone have experience or advice they'd be willing to share?
 
 and if all goes well, when i boot 8.0 are my deamons going to start and be
 happy:
 
 Server version: 5.0.87 FreeBSD port: mysql-server-5.0.87
 Sphinx 0.9.8.1-release (r1533)
 Server version: Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD)
 PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Nov 20 2009 16:10:58) 

Yes, this upgrade should work in one step.  Make sure to install the
compat7x port, and all the software you installed under 7.1 will be able
to keep running.

Note however that the compat7x stuff is merely a measure to give
yourself a breathing space between upgrading the OS and rebuilding all
your ports.

You really do have to reinstall all the ports on a major version
upgrade: while installed ports will still run if you don't touch them,
as soon as you start updating anything, or installing anything new, it
will start to go horribly poo unless you haved reinstalled everything.
I note that the software you're running is all a few versions behind
what's current, and some of those updates involve pretty significant
changes (eg. php 5.2 to 5.3; changes to the way apache ports work;
Oracle pushing to drop support for MySQL 5.0) so a bit of forethough and
planning is advised, but there's no real deal-breaker there.

Also, if you wait for a few weeks you could go directly to 8.1-RELEASE,
which might be a better choice.  There have been some pretty significant
bugfixes between 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RELEASE.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwZBKEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwp/QCfRyRsbjlb1QkyLuMcmat9DTAL
mPMAn1ad7v6cHKVNJLSiwBfW5qJtss+B
=HMSM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 7.1 and wireless with ural

2010-04-20 Thread Alberto Mijares
 And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
 ifconfig_ural0=wpa DHCP
 hostname=my.home.server



You must create a virtual interface (i.e. wlan0) and then configure it.

# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ural0

Read man(5) rc.conf and the handbook for more information. You are
using FreeBSD 8, don't you?

Regards


Alberto Mijares
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 7.1 and wireless with ural

2010-04-20 Thread Harry Matthiesen Jensen
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:43:18PM -0400, Bobby Walker wrote:
 
 Hey list, I've searched and searched for a solution to this problem and I 
 can't find one.
  
 I've got the wireless nic setup, its a Linksys WUSB54G v2.
  

I have a Linksys WUSB54GC, and use the rum driver, check out the man
page, man rum..., the WUSB54G is mentioned here as well..
..it works like a dream on my 8.0-STABLE system

-- 
Mvh/Brgds Harry
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #23: Compiled at Mon Apr 19 18:55:29 CEST 2010  i386
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 7.1 and wireless with ural

2010-04-20 Thread Bobby Walker


No I only had 7.1 on CD, but I've burned 8 onto disc and will upgrade  
when I get home tonight.


Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com  
wrote:



And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
ifconfig_ural0=wpa DHCP
hostname=my.home.server




You must create a virtual interface (i.e. wlan0) and then configure  
it.


# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ural0

Read man(5) rc.conf and the handbook for more information. You are
using FreeBSD 8, don't you?

Regards


Alberto Mijares


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: 7.1 and wireless with ural

2010-04-20 Thread Bobby Walker

FYI,

 

I upgraded to 8.0 and built the virtual interface, but still had the same 
problems.

 

I finally stumbled upon the solution to my problem.

 

I added to rc.conf

 

wpa_supplicant_flags=-s -Dbsd

 

It will now get online, I'm rebuilding my kernel before cvsup'ing.

 

Thanks!
 
 From: bobbyjwal...@live.com
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:06:02 -0500
 Subject: Re: 7.1 and wireless with ural
 
 
 No I only had 7.1 on CD, but I've burned 8 onto disc and will upgrade 
 when I get home tonight.
 
 Thanks
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
  And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
  ifconfig_ural0=wpa DHCP
  hostname=my.home.server
 
 
 
  You must create a virtual interface (i.e. wlan0) and then configure 
  it.
 
  # ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ural0
 
  Read man(5) rc.conf and the handbook for more information. You are
  using FreeBSD 8, don't you?
 
  Regards
 
 
  Alberto Mijares
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
  
_
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendarocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


7.1 and wireless with ural

2010-04-19 Thread Bobby Walker

Hey list, I've searched and searched for a solution to this problem and I can't 
find one.
 
I've got the wireless nic setup, its a Linksys WUSB54G v2.
 
Its picked up by the ural driver, but as far as I can tell that driver doesn't 
work for it.
 
dmesg gives me:
 
ural0: MAC/BBP RT2570 (rev 0x05), RF RT2526
ural0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag
ural0: Ethernet address: 00:18:39:03:35:3b
 
Then I get a series of messages that repeat:
ural0: link state changed to UP
ural0: link state changed to DOWN
ural0: link state changed to UP
ural0: link state changed to DOWN
 
Here's ifconfig when the device is UP:
ural0: flags=108843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT metric 0 
mtu 1500
 ether 00:18:39:03:35:3b
 inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255
 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps)
 status: associated
 ssid MYNETWORK channel 6 (2437 Mgz 11g) bssid 00:25:9c:9e:e0:00
 authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF txpower 50 bmiss 7
 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS roaming MANUAL
 
And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
ifconfig_ural0=wpa DHCP
hostname=my.home.server
 
And lastly this is my wpa_supplicant.conf
network={
 ssid=MYNETWORK
 key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
 psk=mysecretpass
}
 
Anyone have any ideas on how I can pull down a stable connection with this so 
that I can upgrade to 8.0?
 
Thanks in advance,
Bobby
  
_
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccountocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


hplip 3.9.8 on fbsd 7.1 with HP LJ P2035

2009-12-09 Thread Rich Winkel
Hi, I can't seem to get it to probe the printer.  hp-setup says:
error: No devices found.
error: Error occured during interactive mode. Exiting.

dmesg|grep HP says:
ugen0: Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P2035, class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 on 
uhub0

The
http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_p2035.html
page says a plugin is required, but no info on how to get that
plugin.

Help!!

Thanks,
Rich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: hplip 3.9.8 on fbsd 7.1 with HP LJ P2035

2009-12-09 Thread Lars Eighner

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Rich Winkel wrote:


Hi, I can't seem to get it to probe the printer.  hp-setup says:
error: No devices found.
error: Error occured during interactive mode. Exiting.


Did you run hp-setup from the command line?  The GUI has been broken for a
long time.

Can you find the printer from the CUPS control panel? Is it set as the
default printer in CUPS?


dmesg|grep HP says:
ugen0: Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P2035, class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 on 
uhub0

The
http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_p2035.html
page says a plugin is required, but no info on how to get that
plugin.

Help!!

Thanks,
Rich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD 7.1 as a router - poor download speed, but normal upload

2009-10-08 Thread .kkursor
Hello everybody! Please help me if you can.
I have a home server built on Gigabyte MiniITX motherboard with VIA C3
800MHz CPU and 512M RAM aboard. The server acts as a file server,
torrent downloader, router and mail and HTTP server.
I have a PPTP connection to my ISP through the integrated network card.
The network configuration is:

[0:04] kkur...@dot.kkursor.ru ~ # ifconfig
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
ether 00:19:cb:54:c6:15
inet 192.168.0.26 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
rl1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
ether 00:0f:ea:e2:cd:e0
inet 192.168.158.102 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.158.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 
tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
inet 195.98.183.20 -- 172.30.96.1 netmask 0x 
Opened by PID 73795
tun1: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

rl1 is integrated network card and rl0 is an additional PCI NIC which is
inserted into the only PCI slot on the motherboard. Connection to ISP is
done over rl1 using port pptp-client.
The problem is that there is very low download speed. My ISP provides
symmetric 4Mbps line, but download speed is poor - about 1 Mbps. Upload
speed is OK. I called ISP, they asked me to connect WinXP computer and
measure speed. It was normal, therefore there is an issue in my server.
If you could point me in the right direction, it would be wonderful.
Thank you very much for your work!

With best regards and looking forward for answer,
Kirill Sarksyan, Russian Federation
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 as a router - poor download speed, but normal upload

2009-10-08 Thread krad
2009/10/8 .kkursor d...@kkursor.ru

 Hello everybody! Please help me if you can.
 I have a home server built on Gigabyte MiniITX motherboard with VIA C3
 800MHz CPU and 512M RAM aboard. The server acts as a file server,
 torrent downloader, router and mail and HTTP server.
 I have a PPTP connection to my ISP through the integrated network card.
 The network configuration is:

 [0:04] kkur...@dot.kkursor.ru ~ # ifconfig
 rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
ether 00:19:cb:54:c6:15
inet 192.168.0.26 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 rl1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
ether 00:0f:ea:e2:cd:e0
inet 192.168.158.102 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.158.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
 tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
inet 195.98.183.20 -- 172.30.96.1 netmask 0x
Opened by PID 73795
 tun1: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

 rl1 is integrated network card and rl0 is an additional PCI NIC which is
 inserted into the only PCI slot on the motherboard. Connection to ISP is
 done over rl1 using port pptp-client.
 The problem is that there is very low download speed. My ISP provides
 symmetric 4Mbps line, but download speed is poor - about 1 Mbps. Upload
 speed is OK. I called ISP, they asked me to connect WinXP computer and
 measure speed. It was normal, therefore there is an issue in my server.
 If you could point me in the right direction, it would be wonderful.
 Thank you very much for your work!

 With best regards and looking forward for answer,
 Kirill Sarksyan, Russian Federation
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



try turning the mtu on the tun0 interface to 1492. If it doent help try a
much lower setting eg 1450.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 as a router - poor download speed, but normal upload

2009-10-08 Thread Morgan Wesström


.kkursor wrote:
 Hello everybody! Please help me if you can.
 I have a home server built on Gigabyte MiniITX motherboard with VIA C3
 800MHz CPU and 512M RAM aboard. The server acts as a file server,
 torrent downloader, router and mail and HTTP server.
 I have a PPTP connection to my ISP through the integrated network card.
 The network configuration is:
 
 [0:04] kkur...@dot.kkursor.ru ~ # ifconfig
 rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
 1500
   options=8VLAN_MTU
   ether 00:19:cb:54:c6:15
   inet 192.168.0.26 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
 rl1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
 1500
   options=8VLAN_MTU
   ether 00:0f:ea:e2:cd:e0
   inet 192.168.158.102 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.158.255
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
   inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 
 tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
   inet 195.98.183.20 -- 172.30.96.1 netmask 0x 
   Opened by PID 73795
 tun1: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
 
 rl1 is integrated network card and rl0 is an additional PCI NIC which is
 inserted into the only PCI slot on the motherboard. Connection to ISP is
 done over rl1 using port pptp-client.
 The problem is that there is very low download speed. My ISP provides
 symmetric 4Mbps line, but download speed is poor - about 1 Mbps. Upload
 speed is OK. I called ISP, they asked me to connect WinXP computer and
 measure speed. It was normal, therefore there is an issue in my server.
 If you could point me in the right direction, it would be wonderful.
 Thank you very much for your work!
 
 With best regards and looking forward for answer,
 Kirill Sarksyan, Russian Federation

Did you really saturate your upload while testing your download speed in
WinXP? What you're describing is a common problem with how TCP works
especially on (but not limited to) assymetric connections. I use the
technique described by Daniel Hartmeier to circumvent it and can fully
utilize my upload and download simultaneously.

http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html

/Morgan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD AMD64 7.1 LAST_ACK stuck

2009-09-19 Thread Simon
Hello,

I'm running FreeBSD AMD64 7.1-p4 After the server experienced a DoS attack,
it ended up with many sockets stuck in LACK_ACK state as reported by
netstat -na

Is this a bug or something else is wrong, how would I troubleshoot this?

Please CC me.

Thank you very much!
Simon


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



Problem installing FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE.

2009-09-10 Thread Rom Albuquerque



 
Hi. I'm having trouble installing 7.1 release. 

The details of my system : 

Motherboard : EliteGroup (A740GM-M)
RAM : 3G DDR2 800Mhz
CPU : AMD Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core processor
Disk :WD 500GB SATA 
DVD : Samsung DVD/Writer Super Write Master
Primary OS :  Windows XP sp3


I'll list the problems and the attempts I've tried to get around them. 


Problem #1

The CD/DVD drive can not be mounted by sysinstall. 
===

I have a SAMSUNG DVD writer drive attached to my ATAPI IDE interface. 
I have a WD 500GB SATA Drive attached to my SATA interface. 

The system boots off the CD, runs sysintall. 

I'm able to allocate storage for the FREEBSD partition and then create the 
individual slices for the default file systems. (/, swap, /var, /tmp, /usr)

When choosing the instalation media as CD/DVD, an error message saying that the 
CD/DVD drive was not found pops up. 

I've tried every option on the boot program, they all fail to load the CD/DVD 
drive
and can't proceed with the instalation. 

I've tried changing the DVD drive to a nother CD/RW drive attached to the same 
ATAPI
controller, the problem persist as before, no change. 


This leads me to my next attempt to install the system from a disk PARTITION. 

Problem #2

Unable to mount the disk partiton at the time of install.
=

Ok, I've created a new extended partition with Partition Magic to hold the 
contents
of the install CD. 

This new partition sits third on the list as follows : 

 a) NTFS partition with my XP installation
 b) FreeBSD partiton where the system will be installed.
 c) The new FAT partiton where the contents of the FREEBSD cd is copied into 
the 
directory named E:\FREEBSD.

I've copied the entire CD to this new partition. 

Back to sysinstall, when choosing the new instalation media Install from DOS 
partition

I get an error message saying Unable to mount /dev/ad8s3 to /dist, and the 
problem
of not finding the DOS partition where the contents of the FREEBSD cd were 
copied to
continues, keeping me from progressing with the install. 

The next attempt was trying to install from a filesystem. 

When selecting this option, a dialog from sysinstall pops up asking to list 
the 
complete path name of where the FREEBSD files were copied to this disk 
partition. 

I enter /dev/ad8s3:/FREEBSD and an error message saying that it can not find 
the 
disk partition comes up keeping me from progressing with the install. 

I've looked at the FreeBSD handbook online, but could not find further details 
about 
installing the system from a disk partition.


Any pointers as to what proper measures to take to try to get past this 
problem. ? 

Can someone suggest some other way to get the system installed. ? 

Oh, I've also tried PC-BSD, but that stops right away with an error message of 
Error loading image since it can not find the CD/DVD drive again. 


I'll appreciated if you can provide further details of how to proceed, point me 
to the
direction where I can get more details. 

Your response is greatly appreciated. 




--Rom

a_rom...@hotmail.com



_
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Problem installing FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE.

2009-09-10 Thread Randi Harper
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Rom Albuquerque a_rom...@hotmail.comwrote:





 Hi. I'm having trouble installing 7.1 release.

 The details of my system :

 Motherboard : EliteGroup (A740GM-M)
 RAM : 3G DDR2 800Mhz
 CPU : AMD Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core processor
 Disk :WD 500GB SATA
 DVD : Samsung DVD/Writer Super Write Master
 Primary OS :  Windows XP sp3


 I'll list the problems and the attempts I've tried to get around them.


 Problem #1

 The CD/DVD drive can not be mounted by sysinstall.
 ===

 I have a SAMSUNG DVD writer drive attached to my ATAPI IDE interface.
 I have a WD 500GB SATA Drive attached to my SATA interface.

 The system boots off the CD, runs sysintall.

 I'm able to allocate storage for the FREEBSD partition and then create the
 individual slices for the default file systems. (/, swap, /var, /tmp, /usr)

 When choosing the instalation media as CD/DVD, an error message saying that
 the
 CD/DVD drive was not found pops up.

 I've tried every option on the boot program, they all fail to load the
 CD/DVD drive
 and can't proceed with the instalation.

 I've tried changing the DVD drive to a nother CD/RW drive attached to the
 same ATAPI
 controller, the problem persist as before, no change.


 This leads me to my next attempt to install the system from a disk
 PARTITION.

 Problem #2

 Unable to mount the disk partiton at the time of install.
 =

 Ok, I've created a new extended partition with Partition Magic to hold the
 contents
 of the install CD.

 This new partition sits third on the list as follows :

  a) NTFS partition with my XP installation
  b) FreeBSD partiton where the system will be installed.
  c) The new FAT partiton where the contents of the FREEBSD cd is copied
 into the
directory named E:\FREEBSD.

 I've copied the entire CD to this new partition.

 Back to sysinstall, when choosing the new instalation media Install from
 DOS partition

 I get an error message saying Unable to mount /dev/ad8s3 to /dist, and
 the problem
 of not finding the DOS partition where the contents of the FREEBSD cd were
 copied to
 continues, keeping me from progressing with the install.

 The next attempt was trying to install from a filesystem.

 When selecting this option, a dialog from sysinstall pops up asking to
 list the
 complete path name of where the FREEBSD files were copied to this disk
 partition.

 I enter /dev/ad8s3:/FREEBSD and an error message saying that it can not
 find the
 disk partition comes up keeping me from progressing with the install.

 I've looked at the FreeBSD handbook online, but could not find further
 details about
 installing the system from a disk partition.


 Any pointers as to what proper measures to take to try to get past this
 problem. ?

 Can someone suggest some other way to get the system installed. ?

 Oh, I've also tried PC-BSD, but that stops right away with an error message
 of
 Error loading image since it can not find the CD/DVD drive again.


 I'll appreciated if you can provide further details of how to proceed,
 point me to the
 direction where I can get more details.

 Your response is greatly appreciated.




 --Rom

 a_rom...@hotmail.com



 _
 Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.

 http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.orghttp://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009___%0afreebsd-questi...@freebsd.orgmailing
  list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


When the installation CD is booting, can you see if your CDROM drive is
being detected as acd0? Another option might be to try installing from USB.

Go into the options menu, enable debugging, and try the install again -
either from the CDROM drive or the DOS partition. Switch to the next
terminal over, and you should see some more verbose output as to what's
going wrong.

-- randi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: messed up upgrade 7.0 7.1 to 7.2

2009-07-30 Thread PJ
PJ wrote:
 Roland Smith wrote:
   
 On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:33:50PM -0400, PJ wrote:
   
 
 I have been struggling for about 4 days trying to prepare 2 computers to
 update to 7.2 with no success whatsoever.
 The more I read the instructions, the less I understand.
 And almost nothing works as it should
 Some background:
 I have been using FreeBSD as a LAN server (for files storage  web
 development/backup etc. and part desktop for more than 10 years. I have
 never had great success when it comes to installation but have managed
 to get it running and have even kept on v. 4.10 for archiving older
 sites I have had.
 The older methods of upgrading worked well enough even though they were
 somewhat lengthy.
 Last week I finally managed to set up an Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 with
 FreeBSD 7.2 and even got everything right. For the first time I was able
 to get Flash  Shockwave to work on a FreeBSD installation.
 With a bit of help from this list. Thanks, guys.
 However, I have not been able to figure out how a custom kernel could be
 set up nor how the new modular system works. Haven't found any coherent
 explanations.

 But now I have the following problems:
 PROBLEM 1. I freebsd-update fetch did not get the security patches or
 whatever else it should - all I got was error: configuration file not found
 
   
 Does /etc/freebsd-update.conf exist?
  
   
 
 PROBLEM 2. There seems to be some confusion about how to update and keep
 current the ports - portsnap seems to work in concert with portversion;
 there are some problems when one uses portsnap as there are with cvsup.
 The two seem necessary since some errors inn installing cannot be
 handled by both...
 If, for example, it is necessary to delete the port completely and
 reinstall it, portsnap just does not do it. I does not see that the port
 direcotry is empty; cvsup does and fills it in so the error can be
 correcte and the port properly installed.
 
   
 Portsnap only updates the ports tree (the directories under /usr/ports),
 not the installed ports themselves. You'll need either
 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade or /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster to
 keep installed ports up to date. I prefer portmaster since it doesn't
 depend on a separate database as portupgrade does. Depending on how long
 it has been since you've updated your ports and the speed of your
 machine, updates can indeed take a long time. You could choose to use
 pre-built packages instead of compiling from source, to speed things up.

   
 
 PROBLEM 3. I always have been running with a custom kernel. So, to
 upgrade I am supposed to provide the GENERIC kernel in /boot. Ok, I went
 through that process as per manual instructions. 
 
   
 Did you check that the GENERIC kernel that you built was installed as
 /boot/kernel/kernel?

   
 
 Had to reboot as I needed to transfer some downloaded files from the
 7.1 box to the 7.0 box for port upgrading.
 
   
 It is unclear to me why you should have to reboot to transfer
 files... If you want to e.g. connect two machines with an ethernet
 cable, are you aware that you can use the scripts in /etc/rc.d to stop
 and restart networking?

 And why not just transfer files with a USB thumbdrive?

   
 
 That was a mistake. Nothing indicated that I could
 not reboot without screwing things up... of course, I should have known
 better; but I'm prone to that kind of error. But I'm pretty sure that
 the automatic upgrade would not have worked anyway as it doesn't work on
 the machine with 7.0 installed.
 
   
 Without a more thorough description of the steps that you followed,
 there is not really a lot others can do to help you. From your
 description it is totally unclear what has gone wrong.

   
 
 Booting on this 7.1 machine is now impossible. I tried to boot from the
 install CD but that only made it worse. As I understood the instruction
 it would upgrade the machine, but I understand now that it just doesn't
 work that way... it has to be upgraded from a 7.2 CD. That I don't have
 at the moment.
 So the boot now just says:
 Invalid format
 FreeBSD/i386 boot
 Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel
 boot:
 -
 
   
 Type ? at the boot prompt to see a list of files in the root directory
 of the default boot device. Read the boot(8) manual page.

 It could be that something went wrong with your disk. Mabye the slices
 or partitions were deleted.

   
 
 PROBLEM 4. The machine with 7.1 - after a complete ports upgrade, I tried
 # freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
 and I get the famous no configuration file found.
 
   
 Does this configuration file (see above) exist? 

   
 
 Somehow, I don't recall that being indicated anywhere in the manual. Oh,
 I did read it... several times... and the more I read it, the more I
 didn't understand anything - from mergemaster to the configuration file
 to the modular kernels ...
 Maybe someone could explain to me just

messed up upgrade 7.0 7.1 to 7.2

2009-07-29 Thread PJ
I have been struggling for about 4 days trying to prepare 2 computers to
update to 7.2 with no success whatsoever.
The more I read the instructions, the less I understand.
And almost nothing works as it should
Some background:
I have been using FreeBSD as a LAN server (for files storage  web
development/backup etc. and part desktop for more than 10 years. I have
never had great success when it comes to installation but have managed
to get it running and have even kept on v. 4.10 for archiving older
sites I have had.
The older methods of upgrading worked well enough even though they were
somewhat lengthy.
Last week I finally managed to set up an Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 with
FreeBSD 7.2 and even got everything right. For the first time I was able
to get Flash  Shockwave to work on a FreeBSD installation.
With a bit of help from this list. Thanks, guys.
However, I have not been able to figure out how a custom kernel could be
set up nor how the new modular system works. Haven't found any coherent
explanations.

But now I have the following problems:
PROBLEM 1. I freebsd-update fetch did not get the security patches or
whatever else it should - all I got was error: configuration file not found

PROBLEM 2. There seems to be some confusion about how to update and keep
current the ports - portsnap seems to work in concert with portversion;
there are some problems when one uses portsnap as there are with cvsup.
The two seem necessary since some errors inn installing cannot be
handled by both...
If, for example, it is necessary to delete the port completely and
reinstall it, portsnap just does not do it. I does not see that the port
direcotry is empty; cvsup does and fills it in so the error can be
correcte and the port properly installed.
And if you use cvsup and the try to update (portupgrade -af), the
upgrading never stops... I just stopped it with ctl+c after more than 30
hours... it was getting ridiculous.
The manual instructions say some like or can doe the portupgrade -af -
but, frankly, it isn't clear on why it should or could be done? It
implies it is a form of testing.  Nonsense... the instructions are
really not clear at all, at least for a dummy like me... (of course, my
studies in English literature and philosophy don't qualify me for
understanding anything, I guess...)

PROBLEM 3. I always have been running with a custom kernel. So, to
upgrade I am supposed to provide the GENERIC kernel in /boot. Ok, I went
through that process as per manual instructions. Had to reboot as I
needed to transfer some downloaded files from the 7.1 box to the 7.0 box
for port upgrading. That was a mistake. Nothing indicated that I could
not reboot without screwing things up... of course, I should have known
better; but I'm prone to that kind of error. But I'm pretty sure that
the automatic upgrade would not have worked anyway as it doesn't work on
the machine with 7.0 installed.
Booting on this 7.1 machine is now impossible. I tried to boot from the
install CD but that only made it worse. As I understood the instruction
it would upgrade the machine, but I understand now that it just doesn't
work that way... it has to be upgraded from a 7.2 CD. That I don't have
at the moment.
So the boot now just says:
Invalid format
FreeBSD/i386 boot
Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel
boot:
-
Now, what do I do? How can I fix this machine so I can either just boot
and access my files or also upgrade to 7.2 (which was my original intent)?

PROBLEM 4. The machine with 7.1 - after a complete ports upgrade, I tried
# freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
and I get the famous no configuration file found.
Somehow, I don't recall that being indicated anywhere in the manual. Oh,
I did read it... several times... and the more I read it, the more I
didn't understand anything - from mergemaster to the configuration file
to the modular kernels ...
Maybe someone could explain to me just exaclty how is one supposed to
deal with the upgrading and customizing the kernel. Should one (I) be
simply using the GENERIC kernel and then expect the upgrading to be as
simple as it seems to sound?
And just what advantage (speed wise I suppose) is there to use the
custom kernel?
Maybe the easiest is to just install the 7.2 fresh; but that would take
the fun out of beating my head against an already cracked wall for
upgrading and would take probably as long to reinstall all the 644 or so
programs.
On the 7.1 machine, I don't really want to lose all the files I have on
there... most have been saved and none are really that important... but
just in case.

If this seems too long to post as is, perhaps I should break it up and
make several posts?

Please help, I am totally confused, disappointed and terribly distressed.
But I still bear no love for that shitpile of MS.

-- 
Hervé Kempf: Pour sauver la planète, sortez du capitalisme.
-
Phil Jourdan --- p...@ptahhotep.com
   http://www.ptahhotep.com
   http

Re: messed up upgrade 7.0 7.1 to 7.2

2009-07-29 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:33:50PM -0400, PJ wrote:
 I have been struggling for about 4 days trying to prepare 2 computers to
 update to 7.2 with no success whatsoever.
 The more I read the instructions, the less I understand.
 And almost nothing works as it should
 Some background:
 I have been using FreeBSD as a LAN server (for files storage  web
 development/backup etc. and part desktop for more than 10 years. I have
 never had great success when it comes to installation but have managed
 to get it running and have even kept on v. 4.10 for archiving older
 sites I have had.
 The older methods of upgrading worked well enough even though they were
 somewhat lengthy.
 Last week I finally managed to set up an Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 with
 FreeBSD 7.2 and even got everything right. For the first time I was able
 to get Flash  Shockwave to work on a FreeBSD installation.
 With a bit of help from this list. Thanks, guys.
 However, I have not been able to figure out how a custom kernel could be
 set up nor how the new modular system works. Haven't found any coherent
 explanations.
 
 But now I have the following problems:
 PROBLEM 1. I freebsd-update fetch did not get the security patches or
 whatever else it should - all I got was error: configuration file not found

Does /etc/freebsd-update.conf exist?
 
 PROBLEM 2. There seems to be some confusion about how to update and keep
 current the ports - portsnap seems to work in concert with portversion;
 there are some problems when one uses portsnap as there are with cvsup.
 The two seem necessary since some errors inn installing cannot be
 handled by both...
 If, for example, it is necessary to delete the port completely and
 reinstall it, portsnap just does not do it. I does not see that the port
 direcotry is empty; cvsup does and fills it in so the error can be
 correcte and the port properly installed.

Portsnap only updates the ports tree (the directories under /usr/ports),
not the installed ports themselves. You'll need either
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade or /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster to
keep installed ports up to date. I prefer portmaster since it doesn't
depend on a separate database as portupgrade does. Depending on how long
it has been since you've updated your ports and the speed of your
machine, updates can indeed take a long time. You could choose to use
pre-built packages instead of compiling from source, to speed things up.

 PROBLEM 3. I always have been running with a custom kernel. So, to
 upgrade I am supposed to provide the GENERIC kernel in /boot. Ok, I went
 through that process as per manual instructions. 

Did you check that the GENERIC kernel that you built was installed as
/boot/kernel/kernel?

 Had to reboot as I needed to transfer some downloaded files from the
 7.1 box to the 7.0 box for port upgrading.

It is unclear to me why you should have to reboot to transfer
files... If you want to e.g. connect two machines with an ethernet
cable, are you aware that you can use the scripts in /etc/rc.d to stop
and restart networking?

And why not just transfer files with a USB thumbdrive?

 That was a mistake. Nothing indicated that I could
 not reboot without screwing things up... of course, I should have known
 better; but I'm prone to that kind of error. But I'm pretty sure that
 the automatic upgrade would not have worked anyway as it doesn't work on
 the machine with 7.0 installed.

Without a more thorough description of the steps that you followed,
there is not really a lot others can do to help you. From your
description it is totally unclear what has gone wrong.

 Booting on this 7.1 machine is now impossible. I tried to boot from the
 install CD but that only made it worse. As I understood the instruction
 it would upgrade the machine, but I understand now that it just doesn't
 work that way... it has to be upgraded from a 7.2 CD. That I don't have
 at the moment.
 So the boot now just says:
 Invalid format
 FreeBSD/i386 boot
 Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel
 boot:
 -

Type ? at the boot prompt to see a list of files in the root directory
of the default boot device. Read the boot(8) manual page.

It could be that something went wrong with your disk. Mabye the slices
or partitions were deleted.

 PROBLEM 4. The machine with 7.1 - after a complete ports upgrade, I tried
 # freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
 and I get the famous no configuration file found.

Does this configuration file (see above) exist? 

 Somehow, I don't recall that being indicated anywhere in the manual. Oh,
 I did read it... several times... and the more I read it, the more I
 didn't understand anything - from mergemaster to the configuration file
 to the modular kernels ...
 Maybe someone could explain to me just exaclty how is one supposed to
 deal with the upgrading and customizing the kernel. Should one (I) be
 simply using the GENERIC kernel and then expect the upgrading to be as
 simple as it seems to sound?

If you want a custom

Re: messed up upgrade 7.0 7.1 to 7.2

2009-07-29 Thread PJ
Roland Smith wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:33:50PM -0400, PJ wrote:
   
 I have been struggling for about 4 days trying to prepare 2 computers to
 update to 7.2 with no success whatsoever.
 The more I read the instructions, the less I understand.
 And almost nothing works as it should
 Some background:
 I have been using FreeBSD as a LAN server (for files storage  web
 development/backup etc. and part desktop for more than 10 years. I have
 never had great success when it comes to installation but have managed
 to get it running and have even kept on v. 4.10 for archiving older
 sites I have had.
 The older methods of upgrading worked well enough even though they were
 somewhat lengthy.
 Last week I finally managed to set up an Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 with
 FreeBSD 7.2 and even got everything right. For the first time I was able
 to get Flash  Shockwave to work on a FreeBSD installation.
 With a bit of help from this list. Thanks, guys.
 However, I have not been able to figure out how a custom kernel could be
 set up nor how the new modular system works. Haven't found any coherent
 explanations.

 But now I have the following problems:
 PROBLEM 1. I freebsd-update fetch did not get the security patches or
 whatever else it should - all I got was error: configuration file not found
 

 Does /etc/freebsd-update.conf exist?
  
   
 PROBLEM 2. There seems to be some confusion about how to update and keep
 current the ports - portsnap seems to work in concert with portversion;
 there are some problems when one uses portsnap as there are with cvsup.
 The two seem necessary since some errors inn installing cannot be
 handled by both...
 If, for example, it is necessary to delete the port completely and
 reinstall it, portsnap just does not do it. I does not see that the port
 direcotry is empty; cvsup does and fills it in so the error can be
 correcte and the port properly installed.
 

 Portsnap only updates the ports tree (the directories under /usr/ports),
 not the installed ports themselves. You'll need either
 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade or /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster to
 keep installed ports up to date. I prefer portmaster since it doesn't
 depend on a separate database as portupgrade does. Depending on how long
 it has been since you've updated your ports and the speed of your
 machine, updates can indeed take a long time. You could choose to use
 pre-built packages instead of compiling from source, to speed things up.

   
 PROBLEM 3. I always have been running with a custom kernel. So, to
 upgrade I am supposed to provide the GENERIC kernel in /boot. Ok, I went
 through that process as per manual instructions. 
 

 Did you check that the GENERIC kernel that you built was installed as
 /boot/kernel/kernel?

   
 Had to reboot as I needed to transfer some downloaded files from the
 7.1 box to the 7.0 box for port upgrading.
 

 It is unclear to me why you should have to reboot to transfer
 files... If you want to e.g. connect two machines with an ethernet
 cable, are you aware that you can use the scripts in /etc/rc.d to stop
 and restart networking?

 And why not just transfer files with a USB thumbdrive?

   
 That was a mistake. Nothing indicated that I could
 not reboot without screwing things up... of course, I should have known
 better; but I'm prone to that kind of error. But I'm pretty sure that
 the automatic upgrade would not have worked anyway as it doesn't work on
 the machine with 7.0 installed.
 

 Without a more thorough description of the steps that you followed,
 there is not really a lot others can do to help you. From your
 description it is totally unclear what has gone wrong.

   
 Booting on this 7.1 machine is now impossible. I tried to boot from the
 install CD but that only made it worse. As I understood the instruction
 it would upgrade the machine, but I understand now that it just doesn't
 work that way... it has to be upgraded from a 7.2 CD. That I don't have
 at the moment.
 So the boot now just says:
 Invalid format
 FreeBSD/i386 boot
 Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel
 boot:
 -
 

 Type ? at the boot prompt to see a list of files in the root directory
 of the default boot device. Read the boot(8) manual page.

 It could be that something went wrong with your disk. Mabye the slices
 or partitions were deleted.

   
 PROBLEM 4. The machine with 7.1 - after a complete ports upgrade, I tried
 # freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
 and I get the famous no configuration file found.
 

 Does this configuration file (see above) exist? 

   
 Somehow, I don't recall that being indicated anywhere in the manual. Oh,
 I did read it... several times... and the more I read it, the more I
 didn't understand anything - from mergemaster to the configuration file
 to the modular kernels ...
 Maybe someone could explain to me just exaclty how is one supposed to
 deal with the upgrading and customizing the kernel. Should one (I) be
 simply

Re: bsdstats not working in 7.1

2009-07-27 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


I'm running it on 7-STABLE servers without any problem ... but notice that 
others responded that it appears you are on PC-BSD vs FreeBSD?   As late as 
this answer is, are you still having an issue with it on your machine?



- --On Sunday, March 01, 2009 19:20:21 +0800 Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com 
wrote:

 bsdstats is now in the base system.
 Have bsdstats_enable=YES is rc.conf
 Worked this way in 7.0.
 What am I missing here???
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



- -- 
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scra...@hub.org  MSN . scra...@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpuZFIACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvPpMwCfUaNbQJojcXS3Ph5DnesNVH0H
fTMAniGG92QBY+3aELFu+xQZTUMVgiva
=eaWl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


freebsd-update: from 7.1-STABLE to 7.2-RELEASE?

2009-07-25 Thread Axel

Hello,

I have previously kept my machine updated by fetching the STABLE branch 
using csup and rebuilding the kernel. (As described in Handbook chapter 
24.7)


From now on, I want to use freebsd-update to simplify the process and 
follow the RELEASE branch (+patches) instead.


But it seems that freebsd-update cannot help me upgrade from 7.1-STABLE 
to 7.2-RELEASE.


Any tips on how to make the transition to RELEASE?

--

uname -a
FreeBSD host 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Sat Jul 25 12:24:54 
CEST 2009

root@host:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

--

freebsd-update -v debug -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching public key from update5.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update5.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
Fetching public key from update4.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update4.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
Fetching public key from update1.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update1.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
No mirrors remaining, giving up.

--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd-update: from 7.1-STABLE to 7.2-RELEASE?

2009-07-25 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis

Axel wrote:
 From now on, I want to use freebsd-update to simplify the process and 
follow the RELEASE branch (+patches) instead.


But it seems that freebsd-update cannot help me upgrade from 7.1-STABLE 
to 7.2-RELEASE.


Any tips on how to make the transition to RELEASE?


You must use CVSup for one last time. RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE
is the CVS|CVSup tag you should use to update your sources
to 7.2-RELEASE. Build and install that and then, you can
start using binary updates...

Nikos
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd-update: from 7.1-STABLE to 7.2-RELEASE?

2009-07-25 Thread Matthew Seaman

Axel wrote:

Hello,

I have previously kept my machine updated by fetching the STABLE branch 
using csup and rebuilding the kernel. (As described in Handbook chapter 
24.7)


 From now on, I want to use freebsd-update to simplify the process and 
follow the RELEASE branch (+patches) instead.


But it seems that freebsd-update cannot help me upgrade from 7.1-STABLE 
to 7.2-RELEASE.


Any tips on how to make the transition to RELEASE?

--

uname -a
FreeBSD host 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Sat Jul 25 12:24:54 
CEST 2009

root@host:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

--

freebsd-update -v debug -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching public key from update5.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update5.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
Fetching public key from update4.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update4.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
Fetching public key from update1.FreeBSD.org... fetch: 
http://update1.FreeBSD.org/7.1-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl: Not Found

failed.
No mirrors remaining, giving up.

--


Probably your best plan would be to:

  * Back up everything, but particularly all of the contents of /etc
/usr/local/etc and /home and anywhere else you have important files
you can't recover from original sources.

  * csup to RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE (ie use that as the cvs tag in your sup 
file).  This will give you code base the release was generated

from. Compile and update your system the normal way -- uname(1) should
identify itself as 7.2-RELEASE after this.  Replace any custom kernel
with GENERIC if you want to use freebsd-update for the kernel as well
as the world.

  * use freebsd-update to to upgrade from 7.2-RELEASE to 7.2-RELEASE-p2 
according to the instructions in the man page.


Now, you'll be using a self-compiled version of FreeBSD rather than exactly
what comes off the release .iso so there will be minor differences and 
mismatched
checksums for various files.  However I think freebsd-update should be able to
cope, and will probably overwrite any non-matching files.  In case it doesn't,
your next recourse would be to grab a release .iso from the FTP sites and 
overwrite
your system with the version from the install media.  You can do this without
completely trashing your existing setup if you take care -- particularly make
sure that you tell the installer *not* to newfs any partitions.  Of course, 
make sure you've backed everything up before trying this, as it will overwrite

some of the files under /etc with the default versions.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: freebsd-update: from 7.1-STABLE to 7.2-RELEASE?

2009-07-25 Thread Manolis Kiagias
Axel wrote:
 Hello,

 I have previously kept my machine updated by fetching the STABLE
 branch using csup and rebuilding the kernel. (As described in Handbook
 chapter 24.7)

 From now on, I want to use freebsd-update to simplify the process and
 follow the RELEASE branch (+patches) instead.

 But it seems that freebsd-update cannot help me upgrade from
 7.1-STABLE to 7.2-RELEASE.

 Any tips on how to make the transition to RELEASE?


freebsd-update can take you from one very specific point of FreeBSD to
another. For example, RELEASE to RELEASE or BETAx to RELEASE.  If you
follow STABLE, there is no such defined point hence you cannot use
freebsd-update to go from STABLE to RELEASE.

For your case, use the csup / rebuild method one more time to get to
7.2-RELEASE. After that you can start using freebsd-update to upgrade
from one release to the next.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2 [SOLVED]

2009-07-21 Thread Bryant Eadon

b. f. wrote:

#How can I mount this disc ?  Does udf.ko support this format ?

I don't often use memory disks, so I'm not quite sure what is going
wrong here.  You could try configuring it and mounting it as
read-only, to see if that helps.  But you should be aware that FreeBSD
does not support _all_ UDF filesystems, only some of them,  and there
were some shortcomings with the earlier implementation of udf.ko that
you are using.  For more information, see for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format

So your disk image, if it really has an intact and valid UDF
filesystem,  may still be unmountable even if you are doing everything
properly.  I would suggest that you install the sysutils/udfclient
port or package, and use it to try to read the disk image.  It
supports a slightly wider range of UDF filesystems than the kernel
module, and you don't have to go to the trouble of mounting the disk
image to read it.  Of course, if you need to mount it, you could try
dumping it to a different filesystem and then mounting it as a memory
disk or otherwise.  If that doesn't work, then it may be easiest to
use the native tools in some other OS (e.g., NetBSD, Vista ... )

b.


I'm disappointed that FreeBSD mount_udf doesn't support this disc.

to those trying:
  the solution is to use udfclient and browse that way.  Alternatively there is 
a refuse package that makes UDFclient into a FS to mount.


Do not be deterred by the complicated first-level directory :

97505d80MS UDFBridge:UDF Volume:GRC1CULXFRER_EN_DVD:GRC1CULXFRER_EN_#503F


Yes, there are spaces in it, you'll want to quote it to access it properly.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2 [SOLVED]

2009-07-21 Thread b. f.
On 7/22/09, Bryant Eadon bryant.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
...


 I'm disappointed that FreeBSD mount_udf doesn't support this disc.


Disappointed enough to port the latest NetBSD UDF improvements to
FreeBSD?  Or to analyze the udfclient sources and make some
improvements to the kernel module?  ;)

I'm glad to hear that at least you were able to read it, and of course
a follow-up such as yours is helpful to the others that may encounter
the same problem, so thanks for letting us know.

b.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

2009-07-19 Thread Bryant Eadon

Hello,

In trying to get a copy of Windows 7 working under qemu today I ran into a bit 
of a snag mounting the image.


## giving me a node to play with ...

  sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -f 
/tank/extract/7100.0.090421-1700_x64fre_client_en-us_retail_ultimate-grc1culxfrer_en_dvd.iso 
-u 0


## and trying to mount md0 :

  sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/

## lists only a single file 'readme.txt' :

This disc contains a UDF file system and requires an operating system
that supports the ISO-13346 UDF file system specification.

##  lovely ..

  sudo mount -t udf /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
  mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument

##

Not very helpful ... especially since kldstat shows I have udf.ko loaded.


How can I mount this disc ?  Does udf.ko support this format ?


thanks,
Bryant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

2009-07-19 Thread perryh
Bryant Eadon bryant.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
...
sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
 ## lists only a single file 'readme.txt' :
 This disc contains a UDF file system and requires an operating
 system that supports the ISO-13346 UDF file system specification.
 ##  lovely ..
sudo mount -t udf /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument
 ##
 Not very helpful ... especially since kldstat shows I have udf.ko
 loaded.

Did you remember to

  sudo umount /dev/md0

before attempting to mount it as udf?  It can't be mounted as both
types at the same time :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

2009-07-19 Thread Bryant Eadon

per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:

Bryant Eadon bryant.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
...

   sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
## lists only a single file 'readme.txt' :
This disc contains a UDF file system and requires an operating
system that supports the ISO-13346 UDF file system specification.
##  lovely ..
   sudo mount -t udf /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
   mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument
##
Not very helpful ... especially since kldstat shows I have udf.ko
loaded.


Did you remember to

  sudo umount /dev/md0

before attempting to mount it as udf?  It can't be mounted as both
types at the same time :)



Right, just to double check I tested it again, even specifying the sector size 
for the device (2048)  ... I'm still scratching my head why it's not working ...


$ sudo mdconfig -d -u 0
$ sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -f 
/tank/iso/7100.0.090421-1700_x64fre_client_en-us_retail_ultimate-grc1culxfrer_en_dvd.iso 
-u 0 -S 2048b


$ sudo mount -t udf /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/
mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument

$ df
Filesystem  1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/ad8s3a 507630 412388 5463288%/
devfs1  1 0   100%/dev
/dev/ad8s3e1012974752931186 0%/tmp
/dev/ad8s3f  2226560805565182 199278412 3%/usr
/dev/ad8s3d8122126 184562   7287794 2%/var
/dev/ad4s1   192305310  175034520   188636699%/mnt/wd1
tank1913870848 1077562496 83630835256%/tank
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

2009-07-19 Thread b. f.
#How can I mount this disc ?  Does udf.ko support this format ?

I don't often use memory disks, so I'm not quite sure what is going
wrong here.  You could try configuring it and mounting it as
read-only, to see if that helps.  But you should be aware that FreeBSD
does not support _all_ UDF filesystems, only some of them,  and there
were some shortcomings with the earlier implementation of udf.ko that
you are using.  For more information, see for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format

So your disk image, if it really has an intact and valid UDF
filesystem,  may still be unmountable even if you are doing everything
properly.  I would suggest that you install the sysutils/udfclient
port or package, and use it to try to read the disk image.  It
supports a slightly wider range of UDF filesystems than the kernel
module, and you don't have to go to the trouble of mounting the disk
image to read it.  Of course, if you need to mount it, you could try
dumping it to a different filesystem and then mounting it as a memory
disk or otherwise.  If that doesn't work, then it may be easiest to
use the native tools in some other OS (e.g., NetBSD, Vista ... )

b.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Stability issues after upgrading to 7.1 - NFS related?

2009-07-18 Thread Brian DeFreitas
Hello all,

We recently upgraded an NFS server from 7.0-p6 to 7.1-p6.  The following
Monday morning, we found the server's networking to be wedged, and
console error messages that strongly resemble this post [1].

In an effort to try the mentioned fixes, we upgraded to 7-STABLE. This
did not seem to help matters; the NFS server keeps wedging 1-2x a
day, requiring soft reboots (via console) at times and hard reboots at
others. Heavy NFS load seems to trigger everything.

Initially, we thought there might be a problem with rpc.statd because
we started seeing RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC : Timed out messages.
All the hosts that timed out were previously-working Linux (CentOS) NFS
clients.

We have IPsec configured in transport mode between all FreeBSD and Linux
NFS clients, but only see the RPC error for CentOS (not RHEL) hosts,
(and no errors from FreeBSD clients). Before the system wedges
completely, `top` reports that most nfsd processes are in the *ipsec
state.

These are all the troubleshooting steps we have taken:

- disabled NFS locking on the Linux NFS clients
- RPC timed out messages still appear

- set up RPC to use static ports for NFS on our CentOS clients
  (to work better with our firewalls, which needed no such
  rules before)
- RPC timed out messages still appear

- added 'rpc_lockd_enable=NO' to /etc/rc.conf
- after rebooting, `rpcinfo -p` showed no lock manager running,
  but the crashes persisted

- added nooptions NFSLOCKD to the kernel configuration
- this only caused things to crash faster (few minutes after
  boot, with very little NFS load)

Unfortunately, one of the issues we've run into in debugging this
problem is the lack of useful logs and debugging information. Some info
we have managed to gather:

- before one reboot, we noticed console messages about mbuf's
  filling up.  Running `netstat -m` right before crashes seems to
  confirm this.

If anyone could provide some insight into what's happening, or help
us get more debugging information, it would be very helpful.

[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-May/006434.html

-- 
Brian DeFreitas
Lead Unix Systems Administrator
Network Infrastructure, RSSP-IT
UC Berkeley


pgpW3JBwvnLhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-12 Thread Mel Flynn
On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
 r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz 686-class
 CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
   AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
   AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
   Cores per package: 4
 real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
 avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
 ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
  cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
  cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
  cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
  cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3


 /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd
 of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

 dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under
 way, target file is created and increases until the hang.

 CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:

   DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
   DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
   DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
   DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
   DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
   DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
   DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
   DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
 ^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
   DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
   DUMP: Broken pipe
   DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

 Hangs always in Pass IV

What's the output ps -auwwx|grep dump at the time of the dump.
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-12 Thread Len Conrad

On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
 r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz 686-class
 CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
   AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
   AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
   Cores per package: 4
 real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
 avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
 ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
  cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
  cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
  cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
  cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3


 /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd
 of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

 dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under
 way, target file is created and increases until the hang.

 CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:

   DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
   DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
   DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
   DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
   DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
   DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
   DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
   DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
 ^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
   DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
   DUMP: Broken pipe
   DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

 Hangs always in Pass IV

What's the output ps -auwwx|grep dump at the time of the dump.

when the dump hangs:

ps auxww | grep dump

root61360  0.0  0.0  3128  1168  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.06 /sbin/dump 
-0uanL -f - / (dump)

root61361  0.0  0.1  5560  2768  p0  I+1:47PM   0:03.65 ssh 
x...@xxx.net dd of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

root61364  0.0  0.0  3128  1528  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.36 dump: 
/dev/da0s1a: pass 4: 92.66% done, finished in 0:00 at Sun Jul 12 13:47:52 2009 
(dump)

root61365  0.0  0.0  3128  1184  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.29 /sbin/dump 
-0uanL -f - / (dump)

root61366  0.0  0.0  3128  1184  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.29 /sbin/dump 
-0uanL -f - / (dump)

root61367  0.0  0.0  3128  1184  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.29 /sbin/dump 
-0uanL -f - / (dump)

root61382  0.0  0.0  1660   900  p1  R+1:48PM   0:00.00 grep dump



btw, with dump and dar failing, I tried rdiff-backup which succeeded.

Thanks
Len


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-12 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 12 July 2009 11:03:00 Len Conrad wrote:
 On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
  FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
  r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
 
  CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz
  686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
Cores per package: 4
  real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
  avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
  ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
  FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
   cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
   cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
   cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
   cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3
 
 
  /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd
  of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test
 
  dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under
  way, target file is created and increases until the hang.
 
  CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:
 
DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
  ^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
DUMP: Broken pipe
DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
 
  Hangs always in Pass IV
 
 What's the output ps -auwwx|grep dump at the time of the dump.

 when the dump hangs:

 ps auxww | grep dump

 root61360  0.0  0.0  3128  1168  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.06 /sbin/dump
 -0uanL -f - / (dump)

 root61361  0.0  0.1  5560  2768  p0  I+1:47PM   0:03.65 ssh
 x...@xxx.net dd of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

 root61364  0.0  0.0  3128  1528  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.36 dump:
 /dev/da0s1a: pass 4: 92.66% done, finished in 0:00 at Sun Jul 12 13:47:52
 2009 (dump)

procstat -k 61364 please?
Is the percentage always the same for the same disk?
If you kill dd on the other side, does dump notice it?
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-12 Thread Len Conrad
At 04:04 PM 7/12/2009, you wrote:
On Sunday 12 July 2009 11:03:00 Len Conrad wrote:
 On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
  FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
  r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
 
  CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz
  686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
Cores per package: 4
  real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
  avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
  ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
  FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
   cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
   cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
   cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
   cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3
 
 
  /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd
  of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test
 
  dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under
  way, target file is created and increases until the hang.
 
  CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:
 
DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
  ^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
DUMP: Broken pipe
DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
 
  Hangs always in Pass IV
 
 What's the output ps -auwwx|grep dump at the time of the dump.

 when the dump hangs:

 ps auxww | grep dump

 root61360  0.0  0.0  3128  1168  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.06 /sbin/dump
 -0uanL -f - / (dump)

 root61361  0.0  0.1  5560  2768  p0  I+1:47PM   0:03.65 ssh
 x...@xxx.net dd of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

 root61364  0.0  0.0  3128  1528  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.36 dump:
 /dev/da0s1a: pass 4: 92.66% done, finished in 0:00 at Sun Jul 12 13:47:52
 2009 (dump)

procstat -k 61364 please?

I ran it again, diff pid:

procstat -k 67765
  PIDTID COMM TDNAME   KSTACK   
67765 100159 dump -mi_switch sleepq_switch 
sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep sbwait soreceive_generic soreceive 
soo_read dofileread kern_readv read syscall Xint0x80_syscall 

Is the percentage always the same for the same disk?

no, it varies widely.  

If you kill dd on the other side, does dump notice it?

yes, I kill dd on the target, and the dump shows:

  DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
Terminated
  DUMP: Broken pipe
  DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

Len


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-12 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 12 July 2009 13:20:49 Len Conrad wrote:
 At 04:04 PM 7/12/2009, you wrote:
 On Sunday 12 July 2009 11:03:00 Len Conrad wrote:
  On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
   FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
   r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
  
   CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz
   686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
 AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
 Cores per package: 4
   real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
   avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
   ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
   FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3
  
  
   /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd
   of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test
  
   dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten
   under way, target file is created and increases until the hang.
  
   CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:
  
 DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
 DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
 DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
 DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
 DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
 DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
 DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
   ^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
 DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal
   2. DUMP: Broken pipe
 DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
  
   Hangs always in Pass IV
  
  What's the output ps -auwwx|grep dump at the time of the dump.
 
  when the dump hangs:
 
  ps auxww | grep dump
 
  root61360  0.0  0.0  3128  1168  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.06
  /sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / (dump)
 
  root61361  0.0  0.1  5560  2768  p0  I+1:47PM   0:03.65 ssh
  x...@xxx.net dd of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test
 
  root61364  0.0  0.0  3128  1528  p0  I+1:47PM   0:00.36 dump:
  /dev/da0s1a: pass 4: 92.66% done, finished in 0:00 at Sun Jul 12
  13:47:52 2009 (dump)
 
 procstat -k 61364 please?

 I ran it again, diff pid:

 procstat -k 67765
   PIDTID COMM TDNAME   KSTACK
 67765 100159 dump -mi_switch sleepq_switch
 sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep sbwait soreceive_generic
 soreceive soo_read dofileread kern_readv read syscall Xint0x80_syscall

It looks like it's waiting ssh/dd to report. Is the same happening when you 
dump to a local file (on a different partition obviously)? This would rule out 
inter process communications within dump itself.

FYI, I'm using this daily through periodic with a few 7.1-STABLE machines and 
-current. Although, I do compress (with gzip and bzip2 on faster CPU's) before 
transfer. The only difference is that I don't use then -n flag to dump. Worth 
a try, though I doubt the so_receive it's waiting on is because it's unable to 
notify a human in the operator group.

If you're comfortable doing so, you could grab a 7.2-RELEASE livefs CD to see 
if this issue persists using the dump tools from there, though I don't know of 
any particular fixes in this area.

 Is the percentage always the same for the same disk?

 no, it varies widely.

 If you kill dd on the other side, does dump notice it?

 yes, I kill dd on the target, and the dump shows:

   DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
 Terminated
   DUMP: Broken pipe
   DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Determining file on which process is trying to acquire lock / fbsd 7.1

2009-07-11 Thread Antonio L.
Hello!

I have a web server running nginx + php-fpm FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE. When
traffic increases, the load doesn't go up noticeably, but I start getting
massive timeouts because the php-cgi processes stop responding.  In top, I
see a whole bunch of these php-cgi processes in lockf state, so I assume
they're blocking while trying to acquire a lock on some file.

I tried using truss to see where this is occurring and get a lot of the
following:

# truss -p 77214
...
poll({10/POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP},1,1000) = 1 (0x1)
recvfrom(10,STORED\r\n,8192,0x80,NULL,0x0) = 8 (0x8)
close(10)= 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
fcntl(4,F_SETLKW,0x7fffc580) = 0 (0x0)
...
That last line is repeated about 20 times, then the process seems to get the
lock and go about its business, and then repeat.  There always seems to be a
pause in the truss output to my terminal after the
 poll({10/POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP},1,1000) line as well.

Is there a way to determine which file the process is trying to set a lock
on? Or any other way to troubleshoot the cause of this problem?

I tried running lsof -p 77214, which showed a long list of files used by
the process, but I didn't see anything about it trying to get a lock on a
file.  Googling suggests that pfiles on Solaris might help with this -- is
there an analogous utility on FreeBSD?

Thanks a lot in advance for any advice you might have!

Antonio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Determining file on which process is trying to acquire lock / fbsd 7.1

2009-07-11 Thread Matthew Seaman

Antonio L. wrote:


I tried running lsof -p 77214, which showed a long list of files used by
the process, but I didn't see anything about it trying to get a lock on a
file.  Googling suggests that pfiles on Solaris might help with this -- is
there an analogous utility on FreeBSD?


  # procstat -f $pid

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-11 Thread Len Conrad
At 11:29 AM 7/10/2009, you wrote:
FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009 
r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz 686-class 
CPU) 
  Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
  AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
  Cores per package: 4
real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3


/sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd 
of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under way, 
target file is created and increases until the hang.  

CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:

  DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
  DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
  DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
  DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
  DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
  DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
  DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
  DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
  DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
  DUMP: Broken pipe
  DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

Hangs always in Pass IV

Plenty of google hits for dump hang freebsd 7.1 but I can't find one with a 
solution.

Len



More tests:

dump hangs, no errors, see above

dar hangs, no errors.

If, instead of a FreeBSD 7.0 remote target machine, I point dump and dar at a 
Red Hat Enterprise, then dump and dar don't hang, run to completion.

So it looks like the problem is on FreeBSD 7.0 machine.  

Any suggestions?

thanks
Len





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


dump hangs on 7.1

2009-07-10 Thread Len Conrad
FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  1 14:37:25 UTC 2009 
r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5420  @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz 686-class 
CPU) 
  Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x1067a  Stepping = 10
  AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
  Cores per package: 4
real memory  = 3484745728 (3323 MB)
avail memory = 3405537280 (3247 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3


/sbin/dump -0uanL -f - / | ssh dump_ima...@xxx.net dd 
of=/var/ftp/dump_images/mx1-root-test

dump has completed only once. Several other dumps have all gotten under way, 
target file is created and increases until the hang.  

CTRL-C gets back to shell,eg:

  DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Jul 10 10:25:33 2009
  DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
  DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/da0s1d (/usr) to standard output
  DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
  DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
  DUMP: estimated 1713942 tape blocks.
  DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
  DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
^C  DUMP: Interrupt received.
  DUMP: Do you want to abort dump?: (yes or no) Killed by signal 2.
  DUMP: Broken pipe
  DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.

Hangs always in Pass IV

Plenty of google hits for dump hang freebsd 7.1 but I can't find one with a 
solution.

Len



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Fwd: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-29 Thread Prokofyev Vladislav


 Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link status
 up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.


 hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange


almost the same.. three rl nic's with 7.0, no problems on all ifaces
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Fwd: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-29 Thread Wojciech Puchar




hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange



almost the same.. three rl nic's with 7.0, no problems on all ifaces


rl and re are different drivers for different chips, just both produced by 
realtek ;)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-26 Thread Graeme Dargie


-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl] 
Sent: 26 May 2009 02:20
To: Graeme Dargie
Cc: ill...@gmail.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

 I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.



 sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE

 7.2-RELEASE

 Maybe?

 Haha ... thank I knew it was something blindly obvious that I was
 missing ... there be a lesson don't try to upgrade 3 systems at once
and
 watch TV.

even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find in 7.1 
problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?



[amd64] The FreeBSD kernel virtual address space has been increased to
6GB. This allows subsystems to use larger virtual memory space than
before. For example, zfs(8) adaptive replacement cache (ARC) requires
large kernel memory space to cache file system data, so it benefits from
the increased address space. Note that the ceiling on the kernel map
size is now 60% of the size rather than an absolute quantity.

Various network interface drivers have been improved, including ae(4),
ath_hal(4), axe(4), bce(4), cxgb(4), fxp(4), igb(4), jme(4), msk(4),
mxge(4), nfe(4), re(4), rl(4), sis(4), and txp(4).


Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link status
up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.



Regards

G

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-26 Thread Ghirai
On Tue, 26 May 2009 09:01:36 +0100
Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk wrote:

 -Original Message-
 
 Various network interface drivers have been improved, including ae(4),
 ath_hal(4), axe(4), bce(4), cxgb(4), fxp(4), igb(4), jme(4), msk(4),
 mxge(4), nfe(4), re(4), rl(4), sis(4), and txp(4).
 
 
 Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link
 status up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.

7.2 did fix this for me.

-- 
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-26 Thread Wojciech Puchar




Are you suggesting a user should only upgrade if they are having a
problem, or do you just like to contribute more nonsense to the list


mostly yes - keep things as is if it works. and it's only nonsense for 
you.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-26 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I'd say it depends very much on the system's use.  For a system
which is in production (i.e. doing ongoing work), there is a
great deal to be said for not fixing things that aren't broken.


if they are not broken - there is nothing to fix.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-26 Thread Wojciech Puchar


Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link status
up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.


hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD-7.1-RELEASE and libkrb5

2009-05-26 Thread Philip Keuleers

I had the same issue you describe portupgrading to
evolution-exchange-2.26.2.

I moved /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.9 to  /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.9_old and created
a symbolic link.

mv /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.9 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.9_old
ln -s /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so.23 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.9

it seems to have done the trick and evolution-exchange works fine for me
now :-)

Philip
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread Graeme Dargie
Hi All

I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.

 

sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE

Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 2 mirrors found.

Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
done.

Fetching metadata index... done.

Inspecting system... done.

 

 

Fetching metadata signature for 7.2RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
failed.

Fetching metadata signature for 7.2RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org...
failed.

No mirrors remaining, giving up.

 

No doubt there is something really obvious I am missing, but I just cant
seem to figure it out, I know the commands I am using work as it worked
fine with an i386 system.

 

Any advice would be greatly welcomed.

 

Regards

 

Graeme

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread ill...@gmail.com
2009/5/25 Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk:
 Hi All

 I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.



 sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE

7.2-RELEASE

Maybe?

-- 
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread Graeme Dargie


-Original Message-
From: ill...@gmail.com [mailto:ill...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 25 May 2009 22:39
To: Graeme Dargie
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009/5/25 Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk:
 Hi All

 I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.



 sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE

7.2-RELEASE

Maybe?

-- 
--

Haha ... thank I knew it was something blindly obvious that I was
missing ... there be a lesson don't try to upgrade 3 systems at once and
watch TV. 

Cheers for that 

Regards

Graeme

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.



sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE


7.2-RELEASE

Maybe?

Haha ... thank I knew it was something blindly obvious that I was
missing ... there be a lesson don't try to upgrade 3 systems at once and
watch TV.


even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find in 7.1 
problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:

 even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find in 7.1
 problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?


Are you suggesting a user should only upgrade if they are having a
problem, or do you just like to contribute more nonsense to the list
by asking irrelevant questions to the OP's topic?

-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread perryh
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Wojciech Puchar
 woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
 
  even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find
  in 7.1 problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?

 Are you suggesting a user should only upgrade if they are having
 a problem, or do you just like to contribute more nonsense to the
 list by asking irrelevant questions to the OP's topic?

I'd say it depends very much on the system's use.  For a system
which is in production (i.e. doing ongoing work), there is a
great deal to be said for not fixing things that aren't broken.

Even within a major release branch (7.0 = 7.1 = 7.2) it is not
at all uncommon for a point release to introduce new problems
along with its new capabilities.  If that were not the case, there
would be no need for the RE folks to maintain the security/errata
branches.  Suggesting that the OP consider the risks along with
the benefits is hardly irrelevant to a question about upgrading.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64

2009-05-25 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:06 AM,  per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:

 I'd say it depends very much on the system's use.  For a system
 which is in production (i.e. doing ongoing work), there is a
 great deal to be said for not fixing things that aren't broken.


This was not the OP's reason for this thread.  It was about
'freebsd-update' not working.

-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-24 Thread Glen Barber
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:


 There is no package for win4bsd on the pkg ftp servers for releases 7.0,
 7.1, 7.2, or 8.0.
 Looks like the release build team has been missed this one for some time
 now.


They did not miss it.  The port is marked as RESTRICTED because
redistribution is prohibited.


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-24 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 24 May 2009 06:47:17 -0400, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
  There is no package for win4bsd on the pkg ftp servers for releases 7.0,
  7.1, 7.2, or 8.0.
  Looks like the release build team has been missed this one for some time
  now.
 
 They did not miss it.  The port is marked as RESTRICTED because
 redistribution is prohibited.

Okay, but then, compiling through the port should be okay. In
order to save some time, it could be possible to pkg_add -r the
dependencies first, then run the make install clean command
in win4bsd's directory.

As I said, dry assumption - I haven't tried it.

-- 
Polytropon
From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-23 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 22 May 2009 23:53:09 +0200 (CEST), Ronny Mandal 
ronn...@volatile-norway.com wrote:
 I'm experiencing problems when attempting to install Win4BSD 1.1. I've 
 downloaded the most recent .tbz of W4B, it installs but fails while 
 building kqemu.

You downloaded sources manually? Why not use the ports system, or
even install from a precompiled package? This would install any
needed dependencies (kqemu) as well. The ports collection contains
version 1.1.

From the port:

# cd /usr/ports/emulators/win4bsd
# make install clean

From the package:

pkg_add -r win4bsd

It will install run dependencies as well.



 Here is the error-msg:
 
 kqemu-freebsd.c: In function 'kqemu_schedule':
 kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: 'sched_lock' undeclared (first use in this 
 function)
 kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
 once

I'm not sure, but are you trying to compile Linux sources on
a FreeBSD system?



 All sources are installed. Suggestions are very welcome and will be 
 appreciated!

Try the port, if you want to compile it yourself, or try pkg_add.
I have to admit that I haven't tried it, so it's a dry advice. :-)



-- 
Polytropon
From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-23 Thread Fbsd1

Polytropon wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 23:53:09 +0200 (CEST), Ronny Mandal 
ronn...@volatile-norway.com wrote:
I'm experiencing problems when attempting to install Win4BSD 1.1. I've 
downloaded the most recent .tbz of W4B, it installs but fails while 
building kqemu.


You downloaded sources manually? Why not use the ports system, or
even install from a precompiled package? This would install any
needed dependencies (kqemu) as well. The ports collection contains
version 1.1.


From the port:


# cd /usr/ports/emulators/win4bsd
# make install clean


From the package:


pkg_add -r win4bsd

It will install run dependencies as well.




Here is the error-msg:

kqemu-freebsd.c: In function 'kqemu_schedule':
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: 'sched_lock' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
once


I'm not sure, but are you trying to compile Linux sources on
a FreeBSD system?



All sources are installed. Suggestions are very welcome and will be 
appreciated!


Try the port, if you want to compile it yourself, or try pkg_add.
I have to admit that I haven't tried it, so it's a dry advice. :-)






There is no package for win4bsd on the pkg ftp servers for releases 7.0, 
7.1, 7.2, or 8.0.
Looks like the release build team has been missed this one for some time 
now.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-23 Thread Fbsd1

Polytropon wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 23:53:09 +0200 (CEST), Ronny Mandal 
ronn...@volatile-norway.com wrote:
I'm experiencing problems when attempting to install Win4BSD 1.1. I've 
downloaded the most recent .tbz of W4B, it installs but fails while 
building kqemu.


You downloaded sources manually? Why not use the ports system, or
even install from a precompiled package? This would install any
needed dependencies (kqemu) as well. The ports collection contains
version 1.1.


From the port:


# cd /usr/ports/emulators/win4bsd
# make install clean


From the package:


pkg_add -r win4bsd

It will install run dependencies as well.




Here is the error-msg:

kqemu-freebsd.c: In function 'kqemu_schedule':
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: 'sched_lock' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
once


I'm not sure, but are you trying to compile Linux sources on
a FreeBSD system?



All sources are installed. Suggestions are very welcome and will be 
appreciated!


Try the port, if you want to compile it yourself, or try pkg_add.
I have to admit that I haven't tried it, so it's a dry advice. :-)





The port build of win4bsd will not build on 7.2 because you have first 
to rebuild the freebsd kernel with option SCHED_4BSD. win4bsd-1.1_3 
requires the traditional 4bsd scheduler. Good possibility this is also 
true for 7.0, 7.1 and 8.0


Gave up on testing win4bsd because of performance impact on server from 
using traditional 4bsd scheduler. OMHO this port needs to be updated to 
function using the new scheduler.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Win4BSD 1.1 on 7.1

2009-05-22 Thread Ronny Mandal
I'm experiencing problems when attempting to install Win4BSD 1.1. I've 
downloaded the most recent .tbz of W4B, it installs but fails while 
building kqemu.


Here is the error-msg:

kqemu-freebsd.c: In function 'kqemu_schedule':
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: 'sched_lock' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
kqemu-freebsd.c:211: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
once


uname -a:
FreeBSD pops.sniffenett.no 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #5: Thu May 21 
21:


sysctl kern.sched.name
kern.sched.name: 4BSD

All sources are installed. Suggestions are very welcome and will be 
appreciated!


Regards,

Ronny Mandal

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-20 Thread Brendan Kennedy
 openssl speed -evp des-ede3-cbc -engine cryptodev

works! thanks Brian.

looking for that patch now...

2009/5/19 Patrick Lamaizière patf...@davenulle.org:
 Le Tue, 19 May 2009 14:25:24 +0100,
 Brendan Kennedy brendan.kenn...@gmail.com:

 Agreed! The driver doesn't seem to be getting executed through
 OpenSSH/OpenSSL for ssh session setup either (it used to work that way
 on FreeBSD 6.2, I don't know if this feature has been left up to the
 user to enable in FreeBSD 7.x??).

 This is a known problem, you must patch openssl to make it work with
 cryptodev on FreeBSD 7.x (8.x).

 There are some patchs, but I don't find them right now... Check the PR
 database and the mailing lists.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-19 Thread Len Conrad

 ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0

 I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm 
 reboot.

 I'll see what happens with my client's machine.


I assume you substituted the correct interface name? (bce0 in place of bc0)

yes, sorry, bc was my mistake, rc.conf has/always had

ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

We are thinking about dropping back to 7.1 i386 (and losing the 600 MB RAM) or 
up to 7.2.

We have several Dell 1950/2950 with fbsd 7.0 and 7.1 that have had no problems 
with Broadcom.

Len

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-19 Thread Dean Weimer
Have you tried the bge drivers instead of bce?  I have a Dell PowerEdge 2650 
running 7.1 and it is using the bge drivers with no problems, though it is the 
running i386 and not amd64.

Thanks,
 Dean Weimer
 Network Administrator
 Orscheln Management Co

-Original Message-
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:06:26 -0500
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Subject: RE: dell broadcom nic  fbsd 7.1 AMD64
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: 20090519124915.sm08...@w500.go2france.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


 ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0

 I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm 
 reboot.

 I'll see what happens with my client's machine.


I assume you substituted the correct interface name? (bce0 in place of bc0)

yes, sorry, bc was my mistake, rc.conf has/always had

ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

We are thinking about dropping back to 7.1 i386 (and losing the 600 MB RAM) or 
up to 7.2.

We have several Dell 1950/2950 with fbsd 7.0 and 7.1 that have had no problems 
with Broadcom.

Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-19 Thread Brendan Kennedy
Agreed! The driver doesn't seem to be getting executed through
OpenSSH/OpenSSL for ssh session setup either (it used to work that way
on FreeBSD 6.2, I don't know if this feature has been left up to the
user to enable in FreeBSD 7.x??).

thanks for the tools, I'll give them a go. The driver is being
accessed properly from 'cryptotest', so I guess that's something.

2009/5/19 Brian Seklecki sekle...@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us:
 The openssl speed sub-command is a real PITA:

 Try:

  $ openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-128-cbc (or des-ede3)

 Also goto /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/  make

 Run those utils to extract useful statistics out of the driver's kernel
 data structures.

 ~BAS

 On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:21 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
 Hi Brian, Patrick,

 Thanks for your responses. I agree that it looks like a bug! I'm a bit
 of a newb to FreeBSD. Where should I go to log this?

 I ran (as root ;) )

  openssl engine
 (padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
 (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
                              [RSA, DSA, DH]

 It can be seen only PKE functions are being shown as accelerated.
 'kldstat' only shows cryptodev.ko, but that's because I have 'crypto'
 compiled as part of the kernel.

 I have found another issue here also - although 'openssl engine -c'
 shows correct accelerated functionality of the hardware driver,
 running a speed test (e.g. openssl speed des-ede3 -engine cryptodev)
 does not result in any messages being sent to the driver apart from
 the initial check for available algorithms. It seems only accelerated
 PKE functions are run through the driver. It may be that the symmetric
 functions are being run through the software device driver
 (cryptosoft)...

 Could it be down to cryptodev engine being loaded twice in OpenSSL? Or
 would cryptodev favour the software driver if CRYPTO_F_HARDWARE is not
 set?

 Regards,
 Brendan


 2009/5/15 Brian A. Seklecki sekle...@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us:
  On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:14 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  I'm trying to test a hardware crypto driver, but want to run my tests
  through the software driver first (and possibly use the software
  driver to validate results).
  I have set the following in my GENERIC conf file:
 
 
  What does kldstat(8) / openssl(1) return?
 
  % sudo openssl engine
  (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 
  $ openssl engine
  (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
  (padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
  (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 
  $ kldstat |egrep -i 'cry|ub'
   3    3 0xc0e06000 25b78    crypto.ko
   7    1 0xc64c9000 4000     cryptodev.ko
   8    1 0xc6546000 a000     ubsec.ko
 
 
  Return?
 
  ~BAS
 
 
  device          crypto
  device          enc
  options         IPSEC
 
  I have rebuilt the kernel, rebooted and set the
  kern.cryptodevallowsoft kernel variable to 1:
 
  FreeBSD_26# sysctl -a | grep crypto
  kern.cryptodevallowsoft: 1
 
  However, when I try a test, I get the following:
 
  FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va 3des
  cipher 3des keylen 24
  CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
  FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va des
  cipher des keylen 8
  CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 
  It seems the software crypto device is not available. Do I need to do
  any other steps to enable it? Is there another config option that
  makes sure it is build as part of Opencrypto framework? Do I need to
  build some other software driver instead?
 
  Best Regards,
  Brendan
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
  freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




 This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-19 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Tue, 19 May 2009 14:25:24 +0100,
Brendan Kennedy brendan.kenn...@gmail.com:

 Agreed! The driver doesn't seem to be getting executed through
 OpenSSH/OpenSSL for ssh session setup either (it used to work that way
 on FreeBSD 6.2, I don't know if this feature has been left up to the
 user to enable in FreeBSD 7.x??).

This is a known problem, you must patch openssl to make it work with
cryptodev on FreeBSD 7.x (8.x).

There are some patchs, but I don't find them right now... Check the PR
database and the mailing lists.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-18 Thread Brendan Kennedy
Hi Brian, Patrick,

Thanks for your responses. I agree that it looks like a bug! I'm a bit
of a newb to FreeBSD. Where should I go to log this?

I ran (as root ;) )

 openssl engine
(padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
(cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
 [RSA, DSA, DH]

It can be seen only PKE functions are being shown as accelerated.
'kldstat' only shows cryptodev.ko, but that's because I have 'crypto'
compiled as part of the kernel.

I have found another issue here also - although 'openssl engine -c'
shows correct accelerated functionality of the hardware driver,
running a speed test (e.g. openssl speed des-ede3 -engine cryptodev)
does not result in any messages being sent to the driver apart from
the initial check for available algorithms. It seems only accelerated
PKE functions are run through the driver. It may be that the symmetric
functions are being run through the software device driver
(cryptosoft)...

Could it be down to cryptodev engine being loaded twice in OpenSSL? Or
would cryptodev favour the software driver if CRYPTO_F_HARDWARE is not
set?

Regards,
Brendan


2009/5/15 Brian A. Seklecki sekle...@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us:
 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:14 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
 Hi All,

 I'm trying to test a hardware crypto driver, but want to run my tests
 through the software driver first (and possibly use the software
 driver to validate results).
 I have set the following in my GENERIC conf file:


 What does kldstat(8) / openssl(1) return?

 % sudo openssl engine
 (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support

 $ openssl engine
 (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
 (padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
 (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support

 $ kldstat |egrep -i 'cry|ub'
  3    3 0xc0e06000 25b78    crypto.ko
  7    1 0xc64c9000 4000     cryptodev.ko
  8    1 0xc6546000 a000     ubsec.ko


 Return?

 ~BAS


 device          crypto
 device          enc
 options         IPSEC

 I have rebuilt the kernel, rebooted and set the
 kern.cryptodevallowsoft kernel variable to 1:

 FreeBSD_26# sysctl -a | grep crypto
 kern.cryptodevallowsoft: 1

 However, when I try a test, I get the following:

 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va 3des
 cipher 3des keylen 24
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va des
 cipher des keylen 8
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument

 It seems the software crypto device is not available. Do I need to do
 any other steps to enable it? Is there another config option that
 makes sure it is build as part of Opencrypto framework? Do I need to
 build some other software driver instead?

 Best Regards,
 Brendan
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-18 Thread Len Conrad
Dell PE1950 III 

frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)

After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000 Mb/sec, 
but cannot ping anything. 

replaced cables, tried the other bc nic, nothing.

Linux in 3 other same machines works fine.

suggestions?

Len

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-18 Thread Glen Barber
Hi, Len

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
 Dell PE1950 III

 frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)

 After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000 Mb/sec, 
 but cannot ping anything.

 replaced cables, tried the other bc nic, nothing.

 Linux in 3 other same machines works fine.


Could you paste the output of the following:

   cat /etc/rc.conf | grep bc0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-18 Thread Len Conrad
 Dell PE1950 III

 frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)

 After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000 
 Mb/sec, but cannot ping anything.

 replaced cables, tried the other bc nic, nothing.

 Linux in 3 other same machines works fine.


Could you paste the output of the following:

   cat /etc/rc.conf | grep bc0

sorry, is bce not bc, 

ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0

I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm 
reboot.

I'll see what happens with my client's machine.

Len



-- 
Glen Barber

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-18 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:

Could you paste the output of the following:

   cat /etc/rc.conf | grep bc0

 sorry, is bce not bc,

Was going to be my next suggestion... I couldn't find 'bc' in GENERIC
for amd64.


 ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0

 I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm 
 reboot.

 I'll see what happens with my client's machine.


I assume you substituted the correct interface name? (bce0 in place of bc0)


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64

2009-05-18 Thread Graeme Dargie


-Original Message-
From: Glen Barber [mailto:glen.j.bar...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 18 May 2009 22:58
To: lcon...@go2france.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dell broadcom nic  fbsd 7.1 AMD64

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:

Could you paste the output of the following:

   cat /etc/rc.conf | grep bc0

 sorry, is bce not bc,

Was going to be my next suggestion... I couldn't find 'bc' in GENERIC
for amd64.


 ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0

and output from:

   dhclient bc0

 I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm 
 reboot.

 I'll see what happens with my client's machine.


I assume you substituted the correct interface name? (bce0 in place of bc0)


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Just took a quick peek at my pfsense machine hp D530 USDT which has a broadcom 
gigabit NIC, phpsysinfo reports bge0: Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet 
Controller, ASIC rev. 0x3003. Might be worth trying that driver.

Regards

Graeme

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-18 Thread Brian Seklecki
The openssl speed sub-command is a real PITA:

Try: 

  $ openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-128-cbc (or des-ede3)

Also goto /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/  make

Run those utils to extract useful statistics out of the driver's kernel
data structures.

~BAS

On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:21 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
 Hi Brian, Patrick,
 
 Thanks for your responses. I agree that it looks like a bug! I'm a bit
 of a newb to FreeBSD. Where should I go to log this?
 
 I ran (as root ;) )
 
  openssl engine
 (padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
 (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
  [RSA, DSA, DH]
 
 It can be seen only PKE functions are being shown as accelerated.
 'kldstat' only shows cryptodev.ko, but that's because I have 'crypto'
 compiled as part of the kernel.
 
 I have found another issue here also - although 'openssl engine -c'
 shows correct accelerated functionality of the hardware driver,
 running a speed test (e.g. openssl speed des-ede3 -engine cryptodev)
 does not result in any messages being sent to the driver apart from
 the initial check for available algorithms. It seems only accelerated
 PKE functions are run through the driver. It may be that the symmetric
 functions are being run through the software device driver
 (cryptosoft)...
 
 Could it be down to cryptodev engine being loaded twice in OpenSSL? Or
 would cryptodev favour the software driver if CRYPTO_F_HARDWARE is not
 set?
 
 Regards,
 Brendan
 
 
 2009/5/15 Brian A. Seklecki sekle...@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us:
  On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:14 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  I'm trying to test a hardware crypto driver, but want to run my tests
  through the software driver first (and possibly use the software
  driver to validate results).
  I have set the following in my GENERIC conf file:
 
 
  What does kldstat(8) / openssl(1) return?
 
  % sudo openssl engine
  (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 
  $ openssl engine
  (cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
  (padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
  (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
 
  $ kldstat |egrep -i 'cry|ub'
   33 0xc0e06000 25b78crypto.ko
   71 0xc64c9000 4000 cryptodev.ko
   81 0xc6546000 a000 ubsec.ko
 
 
  Return?
 
  ~BAS
 
 
  device  crypto
  device  enc
  options IPSEC
 
  I have rebuilt the kernel, rebooted and set the
  kern.cryptodevallowsoft kernel variable to 1:
 
  FreeBSD_26# sysctl -a | grep crypto
  kern.cryptodevallowsoft: 1
 
  However, when I try a test, I get the following:
 
  FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va 3des
  cipher 3des keylen 24
  CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
  FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va des
  cipher des keylen 8
  CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 
  It seems the software crypto device is not available. Do I need to do
  any other steps to enable it? Is there another config option that
  makes sure it is build as part of Opencrypto framework? Do I need to
  build some other software driver instead?
 
  Best Regards,
  Brendan
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
  freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-15 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:14 +0100, Brendan Kennedy wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I'm trying to test a hardware crypto driver, but want to run my tests
 through the software driver first (and possibly use the software
 driver to validate results).
 I have set the following in my GENERIC conf file:
 

What does kldstat(8) / openssl(1) return?

% sudo openssl engine 
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support

$ openssl engine
(cryptodev) BSD cryptodev engine
(padlock) VIA PadLock (no-RNG, no-ACE)
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support

$ kldstat |egrep -i 'cry|ub'
 33 0xc0e06000 25b78crypto.ko
 71 0xc64c9000 4000 cryptodev.ko
 81 0xc6546000 a000 ubsec.ko


Return?

~BAS


 device  crypto
 device  enc
 options IPSEC
 
 I have rebuilt the kernel, rebooted and set the
 kern.cryptodevallowsoft kernel variable to 1:
 
 FreeBSD_26# sysctl -a | grep crypto
 kern.cryptodevallowsoft: 1
 
 However, when I try a test, I get the following:
 
 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va 3des
 cipher 3des keylen 24
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va des
 cipher des keylen 8
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 
 It seems the software crypto device is not available. Do I need to do
 any other steps to enable it? Is there another config option that
 makes sure it is build as part of Opencrypto framework? Do I need to
 build some other software driver instead?
 
 Best Regards,
 Brendan
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 7.1 opencrypto -- kern.cryptodevallowsoft

2009-05-15 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Tue, 12 May 2009 19:14:38 +0100,
Brendan Kennedy brendan.kenn...@gmail.com:

 Hi All,

Hello,

 FreeBSD_26# sysctl -a | grep crypto
 kern.cryptodevallowsoft: 1
 
 However, when I try a test, I get the following:
 
 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va 3des
 cipher 3des keylen 24
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 FreeBSD_26# /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest -va des
 cipher des keylen 8
 CIOCGSESSION: Invalid argument
 
 It seems the software crypto device is not available. Do I need to do
 any other steps to enable it? Is there another config option that
 makes sure it is build as part of Opencrypto framework? Do I need to
 build some other software driver instead?

Cryptodev fails because it checks that the requested crypto driver
provides hardware crypto. function checkforsoftware in cryptodev.c
And it does not take care about the sysctl kern.cryptodevallowsoft. 

Looks like a bug and not a feature. OpenBSD's cryptodev seems to take
care about the sysctl and i think you can use the cryptosoft driver
with it. 

Regards.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: /tmp/security on 7.1-Release

2009-05-14 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello,

 Ever since upgrading from 7.0-Release to 7.1-Release I get the
 following in the daily security reports:

 master.lc-words.com kernel log messages:
 +++ /tmp/security.yMzCQbS8   2009-05-13 03:01:25.0 +0200
 +re0: watchdog timeout
 +re0: link state changed to DOWN
 +re0: link state changed to UP

 It just happens around 3 a.m. each day and so I wonder if I should be
 concerned about it...?

 Thank you in advance for your suggestions!

 I can bet it's NIC related problem, probably your re0 is sharing IRQ
 with something and it's going up/down. The time you see (~3.oo AM) is
 the moment periodic works, so it doesn't mean the problem happend then.

 I've seen similar problems on cheap PC hardware with integrated NIC
 and/or external PCI NIC (re/rl/em). Search for 're0: watchdog timeout'
 on google.

 The solution is to replace re with something else - em for example, but
 there is no guarantee it's going to work - I had same problems on
 crappy hardware with two identical interfaces plugged in (some model of
 em - IRRC Intel PRO/1000 GT)

Yes, you are most likely right but I am left wondering why this has never
been a problem on 7.0-Release...?

So either the problem in question did not occur on 7.0 or it did occur but
wasn't reported.

Thanks!

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: /tmp/security on 7.1-Release

2009-05-14 Thread Mel Flynn
On Thursday 14 May 2009 08:35:40 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
 Hello,

  Ever since upgrading from 7.0-Release to 7.1-Release I get the
  following in the daily security reports:
 
  master.lc-words.com kernel log messages:
  +++ /tmp/security.yMzCQbS8 2009-05-13 03:01:25.0 +0200
  +re0: watchdog timeout
  +re0: link state changed to DOWN
  +re0: link state changed to UP
 
  It just happens around 3 a.m. each day and so I wonder if I should be
  concerned about it...?
 
  Thank you in advance for your suggestions!
 
  I can bet it's NIC related problem, probably your re0 is sharing IRQ
  with something and it's going up/down. The time you see (~3.oo AM) is
  the moment periodic works, so it doesn't mean the problem happend then.
 
  I've seen similar problems on cheap PC hardware with integrated NIC
  and/or external PCI NIC (re/rl/em). Search for 're0: watchdog timeout'
  on google.
 
  The solution is to replace re with something else - em for example, but
  there is no guarantee it's going to work - I had same problems on
  crappy hardware with two identical interfaces plugged in (some model of
  em - IRRC Intel PRO/1000 GT)

 Yes, you are most likely right but I am left wondering why this has never
 been a problem on 7.0-Release...?

Run a 7.0-RELEASE kernel to be sure of this. It can just be that the hardware 
went bad around the same time you upgraded.
Bad cable or negotiation with a switch are also causes of this. See the 
DIAGNOSTICS section of the re driver.
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


/tmp/security on 7.1-Release

2009-05-13 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello,

Ever since upgrading from 7.0-Release to 7.1-Release I get the following
in the daily security reports:

master.lc-words.com kernel log messages:
+++ /tmp/security.yMzCQbS8  2009-05-13 03:01:25.0 +0200
+re0: watchdog timeout
+re0: link state changed to DOWN
+re0: link state changed to UP

It just happens around 3 a.m. each day and so I wonder if I should be
concerned about it...?

Thank you in advance for your suggestions!

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot
www.fairtrade.net.pl

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 7.0 - 7.1 crash every two day

2009-05-13 Thread Gabri Mate
On 19:57 Tue 12 May , Mel Flynn wrote:
 On Sunday 10 May 2009 20:51:48 mailingl...@modernbiztonsag.org wrote:
  Dear List,
 
  I've upgraded from source my 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE. It's a general
  purpose server for a small company and it's clients, running web, sql, mail
  and recursive dns. The machine is a Compaq ML350 G2. Version 7.0 was
  running on it for a year now without any problem. After 30 of April I've
  upgraded to 7.1 (I've followed the handbook) and since then nearly every
  two day the machine becomes unreachable except for echorequest. If i try to
  log in in the terminal it just hangs after i give my password.
 
  I'm out of any ideas. Please feel free to ask any more info that I've
  forgotten to provide. Thank You for your help in advance.
 
 If this is a not a GENERIC kernel, did you change scheduler or stuck with 
 SCHED_4BSD in your kernel?
I've just added PF related stuff, so the scheduler is remained the
default.

 -- 
 Mel
 
 !DSPAM:117,4a09ba6e83011202221441!
 

-- 
Gabri Mate
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >