On 06/01/12 00:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an err
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
> WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
>
> When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
>
> I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
>
> If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
>
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
this.
If I use 'make MK_CLANG_IS_CC="no"' the port compiles.
How do I fix this
Various ports that depend on Perl are coming up with
the error in the subject when I try to upgrade them.
I've tried a portupgrade -fR [package] and even
portupgrade -fRra and it's not fixing the undefined
reference. I've cvsupped several times, including the
base system. I don't see anything relat
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:45:53 -
"Thomas Sparrevohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There really two answers possible here -
>
> 1) Let's call it one depth e.g. make -j - Which works with some not
> all ports - Nice when it works and I guess ports/Mk could hold a flag
> 2) Let's call it width - e
least some of the kde packages - but
only I think if make extract/patch/configure are run without -j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW
Sent: 05 March 2007 21:21
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: compiling ports with more th
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:55:53 +0100 (CET)
Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:37:33 + RW wrote:
>
> > There are two problems here. The first is that not all of the
> > underlying builds support this. The second is that we are using
> > Make as our ports scripting
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:37:33 + RW wrote:
> There are two problems here. The first is that not all of the
> underlying builds support this. The second is that we are using Make as
> our ports scripting language - I'm guessing that in Gentoo no-one
> expects portage itself to be parallel.
I d
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:07:24 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Exactly right. However, you can get some parallel building by doing
> more than one single-threaded build at the same time. This leads to
> some danger of corrupting the database, though, so it's not for the
> squeamish. I know that por
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:44:16 -0600 Josh Paetzel wrote:
> The issues with the config screen sounds like a bug, but one that is
> unlikely to get fixed any time soon. You can avoid it by doing a
> make config-recursive before building the port, but you're still
> going to run in to the problem t
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:32:57 +0100 (CET)
Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning[1], folks!
>
> I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of apps
> will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is where
> it gets a little frustrating.
>
> The p
Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:32, Christian Baer wrote:
>> Good morning[1], folks!
>>
>> I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of
>> apps will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is
>> where it gets a little
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:32, Christian Baer wrote:
> Good morning[1], folks!
>
> I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of
> apps will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is
> where it gets a little frustrating.
>
> The packages for SPARC64 aren't
Good morning[1], folks!
I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of apps
will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is where it
gets a little frustrating.
The packages for SPARC64 aren't really up to date. That is why using
them isn't really an option. Besid
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 00:39:42 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
> > > to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as
On 6/8/06, Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Hello,
>I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
> to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
> intense apps to build. I would like to compile the
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
intense apps to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my
fastest machine as packages, then transfer all the packages to
ports system with cvsup...
Just a though... ;-)
--
Rafael Mentz Aquino
BSDServer Ltda.
Porto Alegre - RS
Brasil
51 - 9847 8825
-- Original Message ---
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400
Subject: compiling ports to packages on fa
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Hello,
>I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
> to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
> intense apps to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my
> fastest machine as packages, then
Hello,
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like to
install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very intense apps
to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my fastest machine as
packages, then transfer all the packages to the slower box, and
JK wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:41:50 -0500
> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically
>>> custom options
>>> when compiling. For example I would like to install apache
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:41:50 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically
custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2
under it's own
dir i
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
> when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
> dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling my own version
> using t
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling my own version
using the configure script I would do:
./configure prefix="/
Are we gonig to start having problems installing ports on FreeBSD 4.9? I
can't get nmap to compile. Here's the error:
output.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.replace__t12basic_string3ZcZt18string_char_traits1ZcZt24__default_alloc_template2b0i0UiUiUic+0x28):
undefined reference to `__out_of_range(char const
On Dec 10, 2003, at 8:12 AM, Bert Lagaisse wrote:
Hey,
1)
I now use the performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel
and compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB
ram)
Does the extra work and efforts compare to the gain ?
If you have a newer processor, there can
]
Subject: performance gain by compiling ports and kernel / java
issues
Hey,
1)
I now use the pre-build ports and kernel. (4.9-Release)
What performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel and
compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB ram)
Does the extra work and effort
Hey,
1)
I now use the pre-build ports and kernel. (4.9-Release)
What performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel and
compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB ram)
Does the extra work and efforts compare to the gain ?
2)
Installing Eclipse on my box drives me co
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Adam McLaurin wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:55, Adam Bender wrote:
> > OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
> > problems compiling ports.
>
> What version of XFree86 are you running?
>
XFr
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:04, Adam Bender wrote:
> XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
There's your problem. Portupgrade to 4.3.x and try Xft and xscreensaver
again.
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Adam McLaurin wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:04, Adam Bender wrote:
> > XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
>
> There's your problem. Portupgrade to 4.3.x and try Xft and xscreensaver
> again.
>
Hmm, I did the portupgrade (surprisingly quick, do I have to do anything
else?). Now I have XFr
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:55:57PM -0400 or thereabouts, Adam Bender wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I then wanted to use portupgrade, which installs:
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD 68.162.128.185 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #1: Sat Nov 16
> 20:36:05 EST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/adam
> i386#
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:55, Adam Bender wrote:
> OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
> problems compiling ports.
What version of XFree86 are you running?
--
Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
problems compiling ports.
Xfd won't compile:
===> Building for Xft-2.1.2
gmake all-am
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11-fonts/Xft/work/xft-2.1.2'
source='xftdpy.c' object='
35 matches
Mail list logo
