Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
Hard to define this one fully in a subject line... I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus protection system for incoming mail. If I send from Mutt, the mails are refused by the WebShielded site; if I

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus The difference is that Mutt-generated messages' SMTP stream contains a line like

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:37:41AM -0500, Gary wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus The difference is that

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AUTH= whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows mailer looks like MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In other words, the AUTH= only appears in Mutt-generated mail. set sendmail =

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AUTH= whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows mailer looks like MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In other words, the AUTH=

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AUTH= whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:40:39PM -0500, Gary wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:05:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: These are the lines that look potentially relevant from my .muttrc: set edit_hdrs # let me edit the message header when composing snip Okay, thanks. So I see it as a three-pronged problem: (1)

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote: Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt problem.. I think you are

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote: Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt problem.. I think

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
Forgive me if I'm confused here, but... On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: Here's a sample of that, from Mutt. I replaced the company name in the banner with [companyName]. 220 webshielde250.[companyName] WebShielde250/SMTP Ready. EHLO kirk.dlee.org

Re: Empty AUTH= in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
Forgive me if I'm confused here, but... On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: Here's a sample of that, from Mutt. I replaced the company name in the banner with [companyName]. 220 webshielde250.[companyName] WebShielde250/SMTP Ready. EHLO