Vince Hoffman said:
> Other than what you have already mentioned then no not realy. By the way
> I (and i think it suggests in the handbook to) keep my kernel config in a
> subdirectory of my home directory and just symlink it to
> /usr/src/i386/conf as i have been know to blow away the entire /us
>I'm planning on making two partions for data found on /usr:
>Does this stretegy sound at all intelligent?
Yes, it sounds like a good plan for all the reasons you stated.
>I'm planning on making /usr 4G, and /usr2 6G. Does that sound sane?
I'm running 5.2.1 with X, apache, samba, and 162 ports
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Vince Hoffman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Terry wrote:
>
> > I'm planning on making two partions for data found on /usr:
> >
> > /usr2 which holds ports, src, and obj; and
> > /usrwhich holds everything else.
> >
> > the /usr2 directories would be symlinked to /u
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Terry wrote:
> I'm planning on making two partions for data found on /usr:
>
> /usr2 which holds ports, src, and obj; and
> /usrwhich holds everything else.
>
> the /usr2 directories would be symlinked to /usr.
>
> The reason I want to do this is because I have a diffe
I'm planning on making two partions for data found on /usr:
/usr2 which holds ports, src, and obj; and
/usrwhich holds everything else.
the /usr2 directories would be symlinked to /usr.
The reason I want to do this is because I have a different backup strategy
for the contents of /usr vs.
