Re: Ports compile options (was IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled)

2003-02-04 Thread Dan Delaney
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 02:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: Most ports will print out a summary of the compile time options you can set when you attempt to build the port. Thanks for the reply Matt. The trouble with that is that you have to build it first. It would be nice to be able to f

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:22:12AM -0500, Dan Delaney wrote: > On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote: > >You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make deinstall > >clean install WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes '. > > That did it for me. Thanks a lot, everyone, for all your

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-04 Thread Dan Delaney
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote: You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make deinstall clean install WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes '. That did it for me. Thanks a lot, everyone, for all your explanations. Let me ask you this :-). When you go to install a partic

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Mykroft Holmes IV
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 16:13, Dan Delaney wrote: > When I do a portscan from another machine, it shows only port 143 open. > Is imapd set to use SSL over port 143? > > --Dan Yes. Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the messag

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Dan Delaney
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Andrew Knapp wrote: It now allows only encrypted connections by default. So, you must log in via IMAP over SSL. For my mailserver here, I use both WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT, but we strongly suggest people to use IMAP over SSL. Thanks. When I do a portscan

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Andrew Knapp
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:14:39 -0500 Dan Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote: > > By deafult the port now complies with secure imap and no plain text > > passwords. You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make > > deinstall > > cl

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Mykroft Holmes IV
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:14, Dan Delaney wrote: > > What if I want to just leave it as not allowing plain text? If it > doesn't allow plain text, what DOES it allow? > > Thanks. > --Dan SSL/SPA authentication. Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-que

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Dan Delaney
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:26 PM, G D McKee wrote: By deafult the port now complies with secure imap and no plain text passwords. You need to remove the port and re make it with ' make deinstall clean install WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes '. Cool. What if I want to just leave it as not al

Re: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread G D McKee
t. Gordon - Original Message - From: "Dan Delaney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:46 PM Subject: IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled > Hello all. I just set up a FreeBSD 5.0 server for a company here in > town. Previously th

IMAP-UW 2002 login disabled

2003-02-03 Thread Dan Delaney
Hello all. I just set up a FreeBSD 5.0 server for a company here in town. Previously they were using a Linux server for their email. I installed IMAP-UW 2002 from the ports collection, and it's giving the following error when users attempt to get their mail: imapd[8769]: Login disabled user=dud