> I'd like to have a clarification about the forward command in ipfw.
>
> From what I read in the man, I understand that on hitting a fwd rule, the
> lookup in the routing table will be done according to the IP address in the
> fwd rule, and not according to the IP destination address of the packet
Hi,
I'd like to have a clarification about the forward command in ipfw.
From what I read in the man, I understand that on hitting a fwd rule,
the lookup in the routing table will be done according to the IP
address in the fwd rule, and not according to the IP destination
address of the packet
>From ipfw manpage:
To enable fwd a custom kernel needs to be compiled with the
option options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD.
Is there any workaround that would allow me to use ipfw fwd with GENERIC kernel?
___
freebsd-questions
f> Sure ipnat and IPFW can and do play together very well. I had
f> problems with IPFW keep-state rules and IPFW/NATD. The Natd function
f> is a subroutine launched by the divert rule. I removed the divert
f> rule and turned off IPFW_nat in rc.conf and added ipfilter-ipnat to
f> rc.conf. IPFILTER
evelopment project.
http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.html#TOC_1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of hugle
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ipfw forward alternative in IPF ?
Hello all.
I'
Hello all.
I'm searching for alternative `ipfw forward` comamnd in ipf
From man I didn't find if there would eb any.
actualy what i'm trying to do is to forward some traffic
but ipnat and ipfw forward doens't work together ;)
--
