Re: Massive upgrade after updating gnutls-1.4.5 port
In the last episode (Jan 04), Jos G. Juanino said: > I read in the UPDATING file: > > ### > gnutls has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions > have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that > depend on gnutls. Do something like: > ### > > I run pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5 and get 42 packages, including > k3b-0.12.17 and abiword-2.4.6 among other (I mentioned only > some of the biggest to build in my slow pentium III computer). > > However, I have noticed that only a few ports depends directly on gnults > port (search for those ports which depends on gnutls but do not depend > on the rest of ports listed in /var/db/pkg/gnutls-1.4.5/+REQUIRED_BY, > see [1]). These ports are (in my system): In reality, nothing should depend on gnutls, since we have openssl in the base system. I have WITHOUT_GNUTLS=yes in /etc/make.conf. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Massive upgrade after updating gnutls-1.4.5 port
I read in the UPDATING file:
###
gnutls has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions
have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that
depend on gnutls. Do something like:
portupgrade -rf gnutls
###
I run pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5 and get 42 packages, including
k3b-0.12.17 and abiword-2.4.6 among other (I mentioned only
some of the biggest to build in my slow pentium III computer).
However, I have noticed that only a few ports depends directly on gnults
port (search for those ports which depends on gnutls but do not depend
on the rest of ports listed in /var/db/pkg/gnutls-1.4.5/+REQUIRED_BY,
see [1]). These ports are (in my system):
aMule-2.1.3
gconf2-2.16.0
gkrellm-2.2.10_1
gnome-icon-theme-2.16.1
gtkspell-2.0.11_4
k3b-i18n-0.12.17
ktorrent-2.0.3
libglade2-2.6.0_2
mplayer-0.99.10
pinentry-gtk2-0.7.2_5
sdl-1.2.11,2
tinyca-0.7.5
wxgtk2-common-2.6.3_1
xvid4conf-1.12
My aim is rebuild only the above ports, and ignore the others listed
in the output of pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5. The question is: do you
think is my approach right, or shall I need to rebuild all the ports of
pkg_glob output?
For example, suppose libA depends on libB, and libB depends in turn on
libC. If version of libC changes, I need rebuild libB but, shall I need
to rebuild libA?
PD: excuse my poor english
[1]
#!/bin/sh
inputPort="$1"
vardbpkg="/var/db/pkg"
#
completePath(){
while read p
do
if [ -r "$vardbpkg/$p/+REQUIRED_BY" ]
then
echo "$vardbpkg/$p/+REQUIRED_BY"
fi
done
}
portname=`pkg_info -qo $inputPort`
if test $? != 0
then
exit 1
fi
###
while read port
do
if ! grep $port `grep -v $port $vardbpkg/$inputPort/+REQUIRED_BY |
completePath` > /dev/null 2>&1
then
echo "$port"
fi
done < $vardbpkg/$inputPort/+REQUIRED_BY
--
http://personales.ya.com/banach
pgpjLD7CFzzxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Massive upgrade after updating gnutls-1.4.5 port
On 03 Jan José G. Juanino wrote: > I read in the UPDATING file: > > ### > gnutls has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions have > been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on > gnutls. Do something like: > > portupgrade -rf gnutls > ### > > I run pkg_glob -r gnutls-1.4.5 and get 42 packages, including > k3b-0.12.17 and abiword-2.4.6 among other > (I mentioned only some of the biggest to build in my slow pentium III > computer). This thing seems to happen more often nowadays in FreeBSD. I hate it. I have a reasonable fast Athlon-3400, but still. I do not think a machine is supposed to spent so much time on building. I know you don't have to 'touch' the ports and could run a plain release. But who does this? Anyway, it's annoying to me. But that's of course a personal view ;-) -- http://nagual.nl/ --- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 ++ Solaris 10 11/06 ++ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
