Re: Messed up port updating (Was Re: Updated to 4.10, now portupgrade?)

2004-08-26 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
Hello Kevin, Actually Curtis' sup file would be just fine with one small change: the line "ports-all" should be changed to "ports-all tag=." If he makes this change it could save him a lot of grief at a later time, if he decides it's time to upgrade source, and comments out or replaces the "por

Re: Messed up port updating (Was Re: Updated to 4.10, now portupgrade?)

2004-08-26 Thread Curtis Vaughan
On 26 Aug, 2004, at 16:10, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, first off I didn't follow the instructions above verbatim. What I did do is copy ports-supfile, edited it, and perform a cvsup using it. All it seemed to do, however, is delete everything in the ports direc

Re: Messed up port updating (Was Re: Updated to 4.10, now portupgrade?)

2004-08-26 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, first off I didn't follow the instructions above verbatim. What I did do is copy ports-supfile, edited it, and perform a cvsup using it. All it seemed to do, however, is delete everything in the ports directory. Here's how I edited my ports-supfile *default host=cvsup1

Messed up port updating (Was Re: Updated to 4.10, now portupgrade?)

2004-08-26 Thread Curtis Vaughan
On 25 Aug, 2004, at 17:44, Steven Friedrich wrote: On Wednesday 25 August 2004 08:01 pm, Curtis Vaughan wrote: So now that I'm running 4.10, I understand I need to do a portupgrade on all ports? and then I'll install the ports I want. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED