Mel wrote:
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:32:37 Andrew Bradford wrote:
Erik Norgaard escribió:
I assume the reasoning for this is you want to preserve permissions
and attributes on your backup, so you can't solve this simply by
setting permissions appropriately.
Yes, exactly.
On Thursday 21 February 2008 22:22:34 Andrew Bradford wrote:
> Mel escribió:
> > On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:32:37 Andrew Bradford wrote:
> >> Erik Norgaard escribió:
> >>> I assume the reasoning for this is you want to preserve permissions
> >>> and attributes on your backup, so you can't solv
Mel escribió:
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:32:37 Andrew Bradford wrote:
Erik Norgaard escribió:
I assume the reasoning for this is you want to preserve permissions
and attributes on your backup, so you can't solve this simply by
setting permissions appropriately.
Yes, exactly
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:32:37 Andrew Bradford wrote:
> Erik Norgaard escribió:
> > I assume the reasoning for this is you want to preserve permissions
> > and attributes on your backup, so you can't solve this simply by
> > setting permissions appropriately.
>
> Yes, exactly. Users need to
Erik Norgaard escribió:
Andrew Bradford wrote:
I'm trying to set up a mounted filesystem that is read-write for
root, but read-only for anyone else. It will be mounted as a backup
directory, so files listed in that directory will be owned by current
users on the system but can't be writeable
Andrew Bradford wrote:
I'm trying to set up a mounted filesystem that is read-write for root,
but read-only for anyone else. It will be mounted as a backup
directory, so files listed in that directory will be owned by current
users on the system but can't be writeable, regardless of the file
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a mounted filesystem that is read-write for root,
but read-only for anyone else. It will be mounted as a backup
directory, so files listed in that directory will be owned by current
users on the system but can't be writeable, regardless of the file
permissions.
