Charles Swiger wrote:
On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:57 PM, Michael Conlen wrote:
[ ... ]
The production system will use dual channel U320 RAID controllers
with 12 disks per channel, so disk shouldn't be an issue, and it will
connect with GigE, so network is plenty fine, now I'm on to CPU.
Sounds like
This might be more of an NFS question in general, but I'm not sure, so
I thought I'd try here.
I've got a FreeBSD NFS server behind two FreeBSD webservers (all 4.9)
who load all their pages from the NFS filesystem and I'm seeing less
traffic from the NFS server than I expected. The webservers a
On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Michael Conlen wrote:
Does FreeBSD's NFS implementation allow for caching of documents on
the client side, either its self or through the VM system's inactive
pages?
Yes to both. NFS clients typically use something called biod or
nfsoid, which implements some combin
On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
Well, you are going to be bottlenecked potentially by your network or
by the maximum I/O rate that your NFS server can sustain. Your data
suggests you ought to be able to handle about two orders of magnitude
more net traffic, if you're over a
On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:57 PM, Michael Conlen wrote:
[ ... ]
The production system will use dual channel U320 RAID controllers with
12 disks per channel, so disk shouldn't be an issue, and it will
connect with GigE, so network is plenty fine, now I'm on to CPU.
Sounds like you've gotten nice hardwa
