Hi
This time I configured as simple as possible
with minimal settings, and voila things worked.
I successfully connected to internet in both
cases - DHCP server disabled in adsl modem, and
DHCP server enabled in adsl modem.
Thanks all of you guys for helping. :)
Here are config files:
## /etc/
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:42:31 +0530
Jack wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> This time I disabled DHCP on my fxp0 interface and
> in my adsl modem too.
> But the problem still exists.
>
> This time I tried both approaches:
> assigned an IP address explicitly to fxp0, and
> then no explicit assignment to fxp0
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:42:31 +0530, Jack wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> This time I disabled DHCP on my fxp0 interface and
> in my adsl modem too.
> But the problem still exists.
>
> This time I tried both approaches:
> assigned an IP address explicitly to fxp0, and
> then no explicit assignment to fxp0
Hi again,
This time I disabled DHCP on my fxp0 interface and
in my adsl modem too.
But the problem still exists.
This time I tried both approaches:
assigned an IP address explicitly to fxp0, and
then no explicit assignment to fxp0.
I still don' get why FreeBSD is having trouble
connecting via P
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:03:50 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:47 +0530
> Jack wrote:
> > /etc/resolv.conf
> >
> > # Generated by resolvconf
> > nameserver 192.168.1.1
>
> If 192.168.1.1 is the modem, how can it be a proxy nameserver? It
> doesn't have an internet connection if it's no
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:47 +0530
Jack wrote:
> My network schematic is:
>
> PC <---> ADSL modem <-> Internet
> 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.1
>
...
> /etc/resolv.conf
>
> # Generated by resolvconf
> nameserver 192.168.1.1
If 192.168.1.1 is the modem, how can it be a prox
Hi,
Thank you guys for your suggestions, and sharing your
experiences with me.
This time I deleted old /var/log/ppp.log file, and
I did modify /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - just the location
of ifaddr line is changed and some more logging
options set -nothing else is changed.
.
The file is this no
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack wrote:
>
>> I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
>>
>> Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
>> scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
>> way to connect to internet is an adsl modem in
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:47 +0530, Jack wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
I've been using PPPoE with a DSL modem for many years, using
FreeBSD 4, 5 and 7 with the system's PPPoE tools. The IP
was provided to the computer directly, so no DHCP in the
On 10/16/12 09:08, Jack wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
>
> After reading handbook and searching on various forums,
> I prepared the ppp.conf file, and tried starting the ppp via
> # ppp -ddial adsl
>
> Here 'adsl' is the profile name, in /etc/p
On Tue 2012-10-16 20:38:47 UTC+0530, Jack (jacks.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
>
> After reading handbook and searching on various forums,
> I prepared the ppp.conf file, and tried starting the ppp via
> # ppp -ddial adsl
>
> H
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:49, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack wrote:
>
>> I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
>>
>> Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
>> scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
>> way to connect to internet is an adsl modem in br
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack wrote:
> I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
>
> Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
> scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
> way to connect to internet is an adsl modem in bridge mode
> (assuming the mode in modem, can't be changed).
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
>> pppoe connection.
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> fxp0 is the ethernet interface of my PC via which adsl modem is connected.
>>
>> Any suggesti
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
[snip]
>
> fxp0 is the ethernet interface of my PC via which adsl modem is connected.
>
> Any suggestions ...
Consider using the ports mpd5 daemon for a PPPoE connectio
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:55:05 +1100
Terry Sposato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:43:20 +0200
> > Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I think you'll find that bursts are best counteracted like this:
> >> http://www.probsd.net/pf/index.php/Hednod%2
Hello again:
I solved the problem with the name resolution associated
with installing ports via ftp, portsnap.
1. I found an erroneous entry in routing tables and removed it
and rebooted.
There was no route to the default gateway because there was
another erroneous gateway entry before it. I
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 04:42:02PM -0700, jekillen wrote:
> I set up a system with a static ip connection to the internet
> I checked inetd.conf and resolv.conf.
Just FYI, inetd.conf shouldn't matter here, as it has to do with
running a server, not accessing one.
> look in resolv.conf, there w
> >
> thank you; your right it is cvsup, but the handbook indicates that I
> could use csup in place of cvsup in the command line on v6.2 and up.
> But that does not seem to effect the resolver issue (unless I am
> mistaken here and the resolver is actually working and it is just the
> reference)
On Oct 27, 2007, at 4:54 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:42:02 -0700
jekillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello:
I have been trying to tame the use of the ports mechanisms.
I set up a system with a static ip connection to the internet
and when I run:
pkg_add -r csup-without-gui (verbati
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:42:02 -0700
jekillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
> I have been trying to tame the use of the ports mechanisms.
> I set up a system with a static ip connection to the internet
> and when I run:
>
> pkg_add -r csup-without-gui (verbatim from the freebsd handbook I
Hello:
I have been trying to tame the use of the ports mechanisms.
I set up a system with a static ip connection to the internet
and when I run:
pkg_add -r csup-without-gui (verbatim from the freebsd handbook I
downloaded just a few days ago)
I get this:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.
On Mar 19, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
Sendmail uses the system calls to resolve names. You need to check:
/etc/nsswitch.conf
In that file check the hosts line, this gives the order for hostname
resolution, typically it is files then dns.
Then you should check your /etc/hosts fil
Sendmail uses the system calls to resolve names. You need to check:
/etc/nsswitch.conf
In that file check the hosts line, this gives the order for hostname
resolution, typically it is files then dns.
Then you should check your /etc/hosts file to be sure that localhost is
there and correct.
Hello:
Where does sendmail look to find out who it is?
Resolve.conf?
It keeps throwing up messages that it cannot
resolve the name localhost, or that is the
way I am interpreting the messages.
FreeBSD v6.2 generic
Thanks in advance;
Jeff K
___
freebsd-q
reebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of charles pelletier
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Question on FreeBSD name resolution
>
> You need to create a resolv.conf file. Your BSD box does not have the
> required information to
You need to create a resolv.conf file. Your BSD box does not have the
required information to be able to resolve ip addresses with FQDNs and it
needs to have that information.
--charlie
_
Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of i
start with your /etc/hosts. it is first looked up then your bind
\jett
> I just installed 5.1 and have been playing around with it, but I am
> troubled by an issue with my network configuration. I apologize if this
> is the wrong list, it seemed to be the most appropriate. I want to at
> least
like the TCP (or at least FTP, WWW & Telnet) programs are
having an issue with resolving the name. My guess is that they are
timing out through trying to resolve via one means, and therefore then
try a DNS resolve. Is there a way to determine the order in which the
system currently does name re
r at least FTP, WWW & Telnet) programs are
having an issue with resolving the name. My guess is that they are
timing out through trying to resolve via one means, and therefore then
try a DNS resolve. Is there a way to determine the order in which the
system currently does name resolution?
dd as many lines as you want. with IP address, hostname,
nickname.
Indeed, but despite the presence of the (IPv4) localhost entry, sendmail was
resolving localhost to my internet IP address, rather than 127.0.0.1.
It was suggested to me that the name resolution method that sendmail uses
would not
Hello!
> # host localhost
> localhost.my.domain is a nickname for my.domain
> my.domain has address 202.x.x.x
>
>
> Someone suggested I check localhost.:
>
> # host localhost.
> Host not found.
AFAIK the host command doesn't use /etc/hosts. No matter what is
specified in /etc/host.conf, the h
W. Sierke wrote:
Hi,
In the course of trying to resolve a problem with sendmail (refusing to
deliver even local mail), I saw a note in the sendmail configuration docs
which says "host localhost must resolve to 127.0.0.1". However, when I
checked my system I instead found (details obscured):
# hos
Hi,
In the course of trying to resolve a problem with sendmail (refusing to
deliver even local mail), I saw a note in the sendmail configuration docs
which says "host localhost must resolve to 127.0.0.1". However, when I
checked my system I instead found (details obscured):
# host localhost
local
34 matches
Mail list logo