On Tuesday 09 January 2007 1:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could configure sudo to give him access to run that one
>> command as root.
> One has to be very careful about giving out such access!
> root has much power.
Hence "sudo", w
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Davidson
Sent: Wednesday, 10 January 2007 8:53 a.m.
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FW: Permissions advice needed.
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Kay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 6:03 p.m.
To: freebsd
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 7:42 p.m.
To: Brett Davidson
Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed.
Brett,
Why don't you make a symbolic link to that file.
You may set read, write and execute permissions if you wish... doesn't
matter.
The users will be able t
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Kay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 6:03 p.m.
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Brett Davidson
Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote:
> I have a curious problem.
>
>
make sure I wasn't
> overlooking something silly.
> Thanks!
Too much work for the one copying unless he has a script do it
maybe as a cron job.
On 9 Jan 2007 08:43:11, "Brett Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Subject: Permissions advice needed.)
>
> I have a
Malcolm Kay wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:02 pm, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Why does he need access to aliases though? For mail program
purposes? -Garrett
I think you may have mixed up two threads with very similar
subject lines. I see no reference to aliases in this thread.
(Confusing isn
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:02 pm, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Malcolm Kay wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote:
> >> I have a curious problem.
> >>
> >> I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and
> >> gid so they can run it.
> >
> > A user does not need to own a file t
Malcolm Kay wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote:
I have a curious problem.
I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid
so they can run it.
A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they
need is execute permission. So what is t
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote:
> I have a curious problem.
>
> I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid
> so they can run it.
A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they
need is execute permission. So what is the real problem?
> HOWE
I have a curious problem.
I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they
can run it.
HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file
and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that.
This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-)
ACL
10 matches
Mail list logo
