On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
>
> That upgrade is a doozie. Been there, done that!
> rm -fr qt2 is (I think) the correct thing to do (someone else on the
> list will correct me).
> Then port kde3.
>
> qt2 and qt3 will NOT live comfortably together. So delete qt
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
> Scott Mitchell wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
> >of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
> >portupgrade coped with most of this mess a
Brian Astill wrote:
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for
(unsurprisingly) the KDE2 --> KDE3 upg
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for
(unsurprisingly) the KDE2 --> KDE3 upgrade.
That upgrade
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 07:41 am, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year
> out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-(
> Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except
> for (unsurprisin
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for
(unsurprisingly) the KDE2 --> KDE3 upgrade.
Portupgrade simply refused to upgrade