Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-15 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:21:13PM -0600, epilogue wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0400 epilogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600 Danny MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it the subnet mask that lets my computer know that for an IP address

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-15 Thread Chuck Swiger
Danny MacMillan wrote: [ ... ] I'm pretty sure I understand subnet masks. The information I was looking for was how my machine determines which MAC address to put on the ethernet packet when sending to a machine off my network. The packet will contain the MAC address of the router. Your machine

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-15 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:55:19PM -0600, Chuck Swiger wrote: The packet will contain the MAC address of the router. Your machine will lookup the MAC address by doing an ARPOP_REQUEST for the IP address mentioned in the routing table which matches the destination IP address of the packet

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-14 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: ifconfig_ed0=inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig_vr0=inet 192.168.0.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 are blocks of addresses in CIDR notation, not the actual addresses to be

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-14 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: ifconfig_ed0=inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig_vr0=inet 192.168.0.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 are blocks

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-14 Thread epilogue
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600 Danny MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: ifconfig_ed0=inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-14 Thread epilogue
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0400 epilogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600 Danny MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:

RE: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-13 Thread Darren Pilgrim
[Note: cross-post removed. -questions is the appropriate place for this.] As your rc.conf contents show, you have the same block of addresses assigned to both interfaces. This is a broken configuration. You need to renumber one of these networks into non-overlapping space. I would change the

Re: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Hi, I deleted freebsd-newbies, freebsd-net and freebsd-isp from the Cc: list. Please do not cross-post to many lists. The -questions list is usually the right place to ask when you are not sure that the topic fits the charter of a more specialized list. On 2004-07-12 16:47, freebsder [EMAIL

RE: Freebsd 5.1 - Win XP Networking problems

2004-07-13 Thread Darren Pilgrim
From: freebsder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Dave, I've changed the rc.conf as per you suggestion see below. Do I also need to change the natd_flags=redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:80 80 to natd_flags=redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.0:80 80 ?? See below. You need to correctly renumber