RE: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence onmirrordevice

2003-07-30 Thread Richard Johannesson
It seems dumpconfig provides absolute settings of the subdisks. Might as
well use those offsets just in case it matters.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Johannesson
 Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:52 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence on
 mirrordevice
 
 Question:
 Is it important that the sequence plexes/sub-disks get created in for the
 primary drive and the mirrored drive be the same? Any performance penalty?
 
 I'm guessing that a different sub-disk creation order will put the sub-
 disks
 in different places on a disk.
 
 Background - if needed:
 Have 10 vinum volumes being mapped by 10 plexes to the root drive.
 
 To get mirroring, I created plexes/sub-disks for swap, root, and usr using
 the specific offsets for each on the 2nd hdd device and map them back to
 their specific volumes they should be mirroring.
 
 When I start creating the other plexes/sub-disks on the 2nd hdd and map
 them
 back to the volume already setup, I won't be using specific offsets.
 
 
 Thanks,
 Richard
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mirroring Vinum Volumes - importance of subdisk sequence onmirrordevice

2003-07-30 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]

Mutilated quotes, known broken MUA.
On Wednesday, 30 July 2003 at 14:11:28 -0700, Richard Johannesson wrote:
 On  Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:52 PM, Richard Johannesson wrote:
 Question:
 Is it important that the sequence plexes/sub-disks get created in
 for the primary drive and the mirrored drive be the same? Any
 performance penalty?

I assume you're asking whether each drive needs the same content.  No,
that would be ridiculously restrictive.

 I'm guessing that a different sub-disk creation order will put the
 sub- disks in different places on a disk.

You don't need to guess: it's described in the man page.

 Background - if needed: Have 10 vinum volumes being mapped by 10
 plexes to the root drive.

 To get mirroring, I created plexes/sub-disks for swap, root, and
 usr using the specific offsets for each on the 2nd hdd device and
 map them back to their specific volumes they should be mirroring.

 When I start creating the other plexes/sub-disks on the 2nd hdd and
 map them back to the volume already setup, I won't be using
 specific offsets.

 It seems dumpconfig provides absolute settings of the
 subdisks. Might as well use those offsets just in case it matters.

I'm not sure what you mean here.  dumpconfig is for dumping
configuration information.  list gives information about objects.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature