On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On Friday 19 October 2007 07:06:35 Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
..
> > > I think log_in_vain can be used when configuring a firewall.
> > > Just to see quickly if your firewall works as expect
On Friday 19 October 2007 07:06:35 Ian Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> > If that's the only message you get
> > you must be protected, at least packet_filtering-wise.
Here
> > I think log_in_vain can be used when configuring a firewall.
> > Ju
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 18:39:56 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> > Thank you for the clue! We are using log in vain as part of our
> > security logging for this particular box, but this is the only message
> > I've ever seen
"Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've basically allowed all traffic to and from 127.0.0.1 in our
> ruleset, but nothing seems to work. Does anyone have a magic bullet to
> make this go away?
set skip on lo0 is not the default, but essentially the only sane way
to go. Se
On Thursday 18 October 2007 18:39:56 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Thank you for the clue! We are using log in vain as part of our
> security logging for this particular box, but this is the only message
> I've ever seen so I'm not sure it's really needed.
It must be a local program trying t
Hello Nikos:
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikos Vassiliadis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Subject: Re: Odd PF Denied Message
>
> On Thursday 18 October
On Thursday 18 October 2007 17:59:49 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> We're getting a ton of these.
>
> +Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:113 from 127.0.0.1:52655 flags:0x02
This doesn't look like a pf(4) message. This looks like
sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain is 1. It logs ev
