Robert Huff wrote:
Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
nVidia, at least, is aware of the issue and has offered to
write and maintain drivers ... provided certain capabilities are
added to the kernel. (See previous discussion in this mailing list.)
This has - obviously - not happened,
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:25 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating FBSD
specific drivers is
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:36:26 -0800
Henrik Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive
stating:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating
Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Again, it appears that NVIDIA has attempted to work with the
FBSD community. Evidently, nothing has come of it. Unfortunate,
to say the least.
The next step - sometimes suggested, but never to my knowledge
attepted - would be for someone to run a
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 07:26 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:36:26 -0800
Henrik Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive
stating:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da Rock writes:
I apologise for jumping into this thread mid way, but wouldn't
the problem be simply a case of nil NDA? If an FOSS programmer
signed an NDA with say NVidia, then wouldn't the hardware
supplier be more willing to supply more specific details?
Anyone with experience in
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating FBSD
specific drivers is directly proportionate to the expenditure of
funds to create and
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:18:10PM -0400, Mungyung Ryu wrote:
Hi BSD folks!
I installed FreeBSD 7 Release - amd64.
I have ATI Radeon HD2600 pro VGA card but ATI is sucks for supporting driver
for Linux or FreeBSD!
So, I'm considering to replace the dam ATI card with NVIDIA Geforce.
I
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:18:10 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Questions drivers for VGA and NIC
Hi BSD folks!
I installed FreeBSD 7 Release - amd64.
I have ATI Radeon HD2600 pro VGA card but ATI is sucks for supporting driver
for Linux or
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Mungyung Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive
stating:
Hi BSD folks!
I installed FreeBSD 7 Release - amd64.
I have ATI Radeon HD2600 pro VGA card but ATI is sucks for supporting
driver for Linux or FreeBSD!
So, I'm considering to replace the dam ATI card with
Henrik Hudson writes:
The driver issue is killing me on FreeBSD.
Call the vendors and tell them you want drivers.
nVidia, at least, is aware of the issue and has offered to
write and maintain drivers ... provided certain capabilities are
added to the kernel. (See previous
I don't wanna play 3D games on FreeBSD, so just cheap Geforce card would be
enough,
but it should support 1920x1200 resolution.
I wonder if what Geforce model is supported by the FreeBSD 7R - amd64.
Anybody can recommend?
none of them are supported on any arch. unless giving somewhat-working
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:24:33 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
nVidia, at least, is aware of the issue and has offered to
write and maintain drivers ... provided certain capabilities are
added to the kernel. (See previous discussion in this mailing list.)
This has -
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating FBSD
specific drivers is directly proportionate to the expenditure of funds
to create and maintain the driver versus the expected revenue from such
an expenditure.
giving out a specs will be the simplest way.
Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
nVidia, at least, is aware of the issue and has offered to
write and maintain drivers ... provided certain capabilities are
added to the kernel. (See previous discussion in this mailing list.)
This has - obviously - not happened, and I do not know of work
in
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive stating:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:24:33 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
nVidia, at least, is aware of the issue and has offered to
write and maintain drivers ... provided certain capabilities are
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating FBSD
specific drivers is directly proportionate to the expenditure of
funds to create and maintain the driver versus the expected revenue
from such an
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:52:08 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry - wrong list. Try:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2006-June/016995.html
Thanks!
Considering the age of the article, Thu Jun 29 11:12:35 UTC 2006, I am
surprised that more has not transpired
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive stating:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all likelihood, the probability of any vendor creating FBSD
specific drivers is directly proportionate to the expenditure of
giving out a specs will be the simplest way.
Any entity, or corporation, has a right to expect a return on their
investment. To expect a corporation to simply give away something,
quite a difference.
for example - documentation about say pentium 4 assembly language and
opcodes are widely
20 matches
Mail list logo
