Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-09 Thread Matheus Weber da Conceição
>> % route add 192.168.10.24/32 200.x.x.x >> % route add 192.168.201.196/32 200.x.x.x >> % route add 10.115.90.236/32 200.x.x.x > add net 192.168.10.24: gateway 200.x.x.x: Network is unreachable > -- The kernel will not create routes automatically? -- Matheus Weber

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Matheus Weber da Conceição
> % route add 192.168.10.24/32 200.x.x.x > % route add 192.168.201.196/32 200.x.x.x > % route add 10.115.90.236/32 200.x.x.x add net 192.168.10.24: gateway 200.x.x.x: Network is unreachable -- Matheus Weber da Conceição ___ f

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.08 10:54, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.07.08 10:51, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote: It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things.

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.08 10:51, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote: >>> It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing >>> to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things. >>> On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP ran

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.08 10:00, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote: >> It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing >> to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things. >> On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP range are you trying to access >> the A network fro

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Matheus Weber da Conceição
> It has been a long time since I've done IPSec on FBSD, but I'm willing > to bet that this has to do with routing, possibly amongst other things. > On peer 'B' (FBSD box), what internal IP range are you trying to access > the A network from...the same ones (ie. are you trying to bridge the > netwo

Re: VPN IPsec Help

2010-07-08 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.07 18:28, Matheus Weber da Conceição wrote: > Hello guys; > > I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0 in my firewall/gateway, and I have to connect > via VPN to a Cisco box. > > The scene here is: > > * Peer A (Cisco): 200.xxx.xxx.xxx >IPs that Peer B need to access: > - 192.168.10.24 >

Re: VPN (IPSEC)

2008-06-03 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On Sunday 01 June 2008 02:49:22 alexus wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel over internet, I read a > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/ipsec.html on how to set > it up, I'm some what strangeling if my setup will work at all. > > i have box #1 that have 1 primary IP,

Re: VPN (IPSEC)

2008-06-02 Thread alexus
i dont really use encryption (IPSEC), i just create a regular tunnel using GIF interface, and it's already not working at this part... it works fine in different enviroment, where both ends has public and private IP On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Bob McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Be

Re: VPN (IPSEC)

2008-06-02 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:13 AM, alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > anyone? > > > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:49 PM, alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel over internet, I read a >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/ipsec.html on how to set

RE: VPN (IPSEC)

2008-06-02 Thread Bob McConnell
On Behalf Of alexus > >anyone? > > >On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:49 PM, alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel over internet, I read a >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/ipsec.html on how to set >> it up, I'm some what strangeling if my setu

Re: VPN (IPSEC)

2008-06-02 Thread alexus
anyone? On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:49 PM, alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel over internet, I read a > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/ipsec.html on how to set > it up, I'm some what strangeling if my setup will work at all. > > i have