On 2003-01-24 18:28, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Giorgos Keramidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > There is nothing wrong with the "old way" if you haven't touched the
> > sources since your last buildworld.
>
> I think you read that wrong. I was not implying that the "old way"
> was bad in
From: "Giorgos Keramidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is nothing wrong with the "old way" if you haven't touched the
> sources since your last buildworld.
I think you read that wrong. I was not implying that the "old way"
was bad in anyway, I was just qouting the handbook reference to
being the "o
From: "Michael K. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > scsi_low.o: In function `scsi_low_cam_rescan_callback':
> > scsi_low.o(.text+0x1e7): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path'
> > scsi_low.o: In function `scsi_low_rescan_bus_cam':
> > scsi_low.o(.text+0x233): undefined reference to `xpt_periph'
> >
On 2003-01-24 17:32, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying to build a custom kernel, but I recieved a stop error after
> (90% sure it was) executing "make" - based on the "old way" instructions
> in the handbook (printed out, but it maybe a release or two old).
>
> Please le
Hello Danny:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Danny wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying to build a custom kernel, but I recieved a stop error after
> (90% sure it was) executing "make" - based on the "old way" instructions
> in the handbook (printed out, but it maybe a release or two old).
>
> Please let me
